What is the purpose of having all these rules, guidelines and voting on contributions if they are approved with glaring inaccuracies? I just did an update and there was one for the UK Edition of The Avengers Infinity War 3-D edition adding a child.  The cover picture with the child was of the 4K cover.  This is NOT a 4K release at all. There is no 4K disc with it, the last contribution uploader must like the pretty picture. That's fine for your own private database, but don't upload it. And why did that make it through the contribution voting?

I constantly get profiles with inaccurate information, but it seems that Invelos plays favorites with contributors. Many times, I have uploaded corrected profiles with 100% accurate information only to have them rejected for some reason or other, many times unexplained, yet I get new profiles or updated profiles of DVD's that are years and years old that have bad data overwriting good data that was already there. I don't have time to police every profile I download, and especially updates of older titles because I have a very large collection. But when you download an update to a brand new title and it has a picture that does not match or information that was there is deleted or changed to inaccurate information, I wonder just what good this is doing.  I gave up sending updated contributions a long time ago because they kept getting rejected for no good reason only to have another update come down the pike with bad or deleted information.  And rejections also seem to happen a lot for certain categories of movies such as gay themed films - not porn, just stories with gay characters such as Brokeback Mountain.  Constantly rejected.  Homophobic much?  Those I update myself and do not even bother to upload anymore.

Quoting wolfman6:

Quote:
I constantly get profiles with inaccurate information

Constantly? That sounds like a bit of an exaggeration to me.

One thing that Ken has said, that - of course - isn't mentioned in the rules, is that contributions with some errors may be accepted if the contributions contain mainly good information, and that the incorrect information can be corrected later. I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with this, as I often see comments like "The contribution was accepted, so obviously Invelos is OK with this".

There's also the fact that every submission has the option of being voted on.  If there's a problem with the data, people vote no.

I submit a great deal.  It's very occasionally rejected, and that's always my error - usually because I've forgotten to tick (or un-tick) a box (T!m quite rightly voted down a submission of mine the other week because I'd accidentally deleted the disc profiles whilst submitting full cast and crew), but that's why we all have the chance to vote on submitted amendments.

I notice, wolfman6, that you haven't made a single vote.  It's all very well complaining, but if you're not willing to do the work to fix the mistakes, I'm not sure you have much of a right to complain at all.