Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next
Kong Skull Island or Kong: Skull Island
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorThe Movieman
DVDP User Since 2007
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,550
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
So, this one is up for vote (both ways, one for the 4K another for the BD) and I was wondering, how should this be entered? Kong Skull Island or Kong: Skull Island? FWIW, the credit block on the inner back cover (the slip doesn't have a credit block) says "Kong: Skull Island".

And here is the front cover itself (the title is the same on all formats):
 Last edited: by The Movieman
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscooterberwyn
Registered: May 31, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 24
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Because the Contribution Rules specify that we are to "use the title from the front cover," I vote for "Kong Skull Island" without the colon.  If we allow punctuation that isn't there to be added, then why a colon and not a hyphen or some other mark?

Perhaps that section of the Rules needs to be changed, but until it is, the rules should be followed as is. If we don't, what's the point of having them?
 Last edited: by scooterberwyn
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorAiAustria
Profiling since 2004
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Austria Posts: 5,715
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scooterberwyn:
Quote:
Because the Contribution Rules specify that we are to "use the title from the front cover," I vote for "Kong Skull Island" without the colon.

The rules demand the dividers for other split titles: Episode descriptors, music and stage performances and annual releases. That's why some of us think, subtitles should be delimeted also.
Quote:
If we allow punctuation that isn't there to be added, then why a colon and not a hyphen or some other mark?

Because the rules demand this for the cases where delimiters are demanded:

From the rules:
Quote:
Episode descriptors are part of the title; separate them with a colon and space; e.g. "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". For multiple descriptors, use a colon and space for each break.
Complete list of Common Names  •  A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1)
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scooterberwyn:
Quote:
Because the Contribution Rules specify that we are to "use the title from the front cover," I vote for "Kong Skull Island" without the colon.  If we allow punctuation that isn't there to be added, then why a colon and not a hyphen or some other mark?

Perhaps that section of the Rules needs to be changed, but until it is, the rules should be followed as is. If we don't, what's the point of having them?

The rules say to "use" the title from the front cover, not "copy" the title from the front cover.  It is a long standing practice to add the colon for subtitles.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbigdaddyhorse
Registered: June 21, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,621
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I wish the rules just said use what is in the credit block on back. In cases like this, I always defer to that (and here it has the colon).
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDJViking
Registered: October 19, 2009
Norway Posts: 42
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting bigdaddyhorse:
Quote:
I wish the rules just said use what is in the credit block on back. In cases like this, I always defer to that (and here it has the colon).

Definitely.
If the back cover has an "Original Title" / "Title" that should be used.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,018
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
No. There are contribution rules in place and they must be followed. As the Martian pointed out, the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.

Whether or not these rules should be changed or not is a different discussion altogether, which can take place in the Contribution Rules Committee forum.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
No. There are contribution rules in place and they must be followed. As the Martian pointed out, the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.


Although the rules tell us to use the front cover, they also detail instances in which we take this data from the back cover credit block, movie credits and invelos' Capitalization tool.

"Include possessives if the front cover includes them, and if they are verifiably part of the title. If quotes surround the title in the credit block (generally on the back cover), check whether the possessive is within the quotes."

"For titles which include periods, dashes, or other symbols, check the credit block on the back of the case if included. If not, check the film credits or opening sequence."

"English titles will be automatically capitalized by the contribution system per the Associated Press style title standard. Capitalization Tool."
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Yep. This definitely falls under the "other symbols" clause.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
No. There are contribution rules in place and they must be followed. As the Martian pointed out, the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.


Although the rules tell us to use the front cover, they also detail instances in which we take this data from the back cover credit block, movie credits and invelos' Capitalization tool.

"Include possessives if the front cover includes them, and if they are verifiably part of the title. If quotes surround the title in the credit block (generally on the back cover), check whether the possessive is within the quotes."

"For titles which include periods, dashes, or other symbols, check the credit block on the back of the case if included. If not, check the film credits or opening sequence."

"English titles will be automatically capitalized by the contribution system per the Associated Press style title standard. Capitalization Tool."


I would agree that this would fall under these parts of the rules. Thanks for putting them here Kathy. The rules really don't tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover, period at all really. There's many instances where we refer to different areas to get the title we end up entering.
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
 Last edited: by Merrik
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
I would agree that this would fall under these parts of the rules. Thanks for putting them here Kathy. The rules really don't tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover, period at all really. There's many instances where we refer to different areas to get the title we end up entering.

I have to disagree, this is not covered by any of the rules that Kathy listed as there is no possessive nor is there a period, dash, or other symbol on the cover.

Subtitles are not specifically covered by the rules, though most people seem to be handling them the same way they would an episode descriptor.  For the record, I am fine with that.  It would, however, be nice if it were added to the rules.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with Martian... this is not covered in the rules. It tells us what to do if there is a symbol in the title on the front cover. That is not the case here.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote


This place hurts my brain sometimes.

APOLOGIES for wording my sentence badly... thank you both for pointing it out   

The point of what I was saying is still the same.

It was said "the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period." and there are obvious exceptions to that.
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
 Last edited: by Merrik
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,851
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scooterberwyn:
Quote:
the rules should be followed as is. If we don't, what's the point of having them?

I'm of the opinion that The Rules were created to promote forum traffic.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:


This place hurts my brain sometimes.

APOLOGIES for wording my sentence badly... thank you both for pointing it out   

The point of what I was saying is still the same.

It was said "the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period." and there are obvious exceptions to that.


I don't think anyone ever said from the front cover not the back period... as it is well known there is exceptions to it in the rules.

What we were (or at least I was) commenting on is the fact that you said that you agreed that this was covered by the rules Kathy posted (the exceptions)... which it does not. As the exceptions are only for possessives and when symbols are in the title on the front cover. This case is neither of these.

Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
No. There are contribution rules in place and they must be followed. As the Martian pointed out, the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.


Although the rules tell us to use the front cover, they also detail instances in which we take this data from the back cover credit block, movie credits and invelos' Capitalization tool.

"Include possessives if the front cover includes them, and if they are verifiably part of the title. If quotes surround the title in the credit block (generally on the back cover), check whether the possessive is within the quotes."

"For titles which include periods, dashes, or other symbols, check the credit block on the back of the case if included. If not, check the film credits or opening sequence."

"English titles will be automatically capitalized by the contribution system per the Associated Press style title standard. Capitalization Tool."


I would agree that this would fall under these parts of the rules. Thanks for putting them here Kathy. The rules really don't tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover, period at all really. There's many instances where we refer to different areas to get the title we end up entering.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
What we were (or at least I was) commenting on is the fact that you said that you agreed that this was covered by the rules Kathy posted (the exceptions)... which it does not.


Yes, thank you. As noted, I've already apologized for wording my response poorly/incorrectly.

I will do it again here.

Apologies for wording my response poorly/incorrectly.

There is in fact no possessives, periods, dashes or other symbols on the cover.

The intent I had behind my posting, which was lost due to my poorly/incorrectly phrased/worded reply, was that this "the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period." is simply not true as there are many exceptions to it that are covered in the rules and I was appreciative of Kathy posting it to show that there are exceptions that are covered by the rules, so it's not as black and white as one may hope (like most of the rules apparently).

Subtitles are not specifically covered, although they should be, and I would agree that they should be covered in the same way episode descriptors are. Seems to be the way they've mainly been handled up until this point.


Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
I don't think anyone ever said from the front cover not the back period...


Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.



(This is not to "call out" dee1959jay on anything as there's nothing to call out, simply pointing out he was the one that said this, to which Kathy replied correctly that there are exceptions, which I was simply trying to agree with... and now this... which I've played into and fed into... which is embarrassing)
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
 Last edited: by Merrik
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next