Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1  Previous Next
|
|
Error in LOTR update |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: September 5, 2009 |  Posts: 20 |
| | Posted: | | | | I recently downloaded an update to my LOTR trilogy extended edition 794043151293 which added the 3 appendices disks for Return of the King.
Although disk descriptions appear correct, there is an error in that front and back case images are of the Two Towers case instead of the Return of the King case.
I don't have equipment to submit corrected images myself. |
| | Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'm pretty sure the appendices shouldn't have their own profiles. They should be part of the profile for whatever movie they are associated with. |
| | Registered: March 16, 2007 | | Posts: 278 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote:
I'm pretty sure the appendices shouldn't have their own profiles. They should be part of the profile for whatever movie they are associated with. I don't disagree with this, but one might argue that the appendices are applicable to the set as a whole; in which case, the profiles should have the cover of the box set, and not the individual titles. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | If I remember correctly, each film has its own set of appendices that pertained only to that specific film. Per the rules, they don't get their own profile. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|   | Eagle | | Registered: Oct 31, 2001 |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 563 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
If I remember correctly, each film has its own set of appendices that pertained only to that specific film. Per the rules, they don't get their own profile. I agree with this | | | | My phpDVDprofiler collection |
| | Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Leiterfluid: Quote:
Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote:
I'm pretty sure the appendices shouldn't have their own profiles. They should be part of the profile for whatever movie they are associated with.
I don't disagree with this, but one might argue that the appendices are applicable to the set as a whole; in which case, the profiles should have the cover of the box set, and not the individual titles. Except for the fact of the way it is packaged. The setr has an outside box that contains 3 5 disk keep cases each case contains 2 blu-ray discs for the movie 2 DVD's for associated appendices 1 DVD for a behind the scenes The set as it is in the DB has each of the appendix discs and the behind the scene discs as individual profiles What probably needs to happen is profiles need to be created for each of the individual packages, and just include the bonus discs within the proper profiles... There isn't a UPC for the interior keep cases, so the profile would need to be the disc id of the first disc of the movie set. |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|