Author |
Message |
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | I've noticed the DB is inconsistent on how digital copies are entered for multi-movie sets. The situation is a set with multiple movies. There's no individual packaging. There is a card included with digital copy for all movies. It doesn't matter whether it's one code or individual codes. Do we enter the digital copy feature on the box set, on the individual movies or both?
Examples include the collections for the following franchises: Fast & Furious, Riddick, Pitch Perfect, Spider-Man (Raimi era), Ghostbusters digibook and Hunger Games. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Since the box set rules say no features in parent profile they must go in the child profiles. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: Since the box set rules say no features in parent profile they must go in the child profiles. The rules say disc-features aren't included in a box set profile. We aren't talking about disc-based features here. |
|
Registered: April 1, 2007 | Posts: 185 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't consider retail digital copies to be part of my physical movie collection since most that come with DVDs or BluRay are time gated and/or DRM riddled and/or limited to one download and I buy A LOT of movies second hand, so a lot of the time not good to me. Personally, I don't want digital copies showing up in DVDProfiler nor do I care about them.
To track and play digital content use something much better designed for it, like Plex. | | | Last edited: by 69samael69 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I for one always considered them disc features... especially since profiler includes them with all the other disc features in the program. | | | Pete |
|
| Eagle | Registered: Oct 31, 2001 |
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 563 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: Since the box set rules say no features in parent profile they must go in the child profiles. I agree with Pete. The program can't distinguish between disc-based and code-based digital copies...a digital copy is a digital copy and should be entered under the disc features of each child profile that has a digital copy. | | | My phpDVDprofiler collection |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote: Since the box set rules say no features in parent profile they must go in the child profiles.
The rules say disc-features aren't included in a box set profile. We aren't talking about disc-based features here. Digital Copy is one on the items on the 'Disc Features' portion of the rules. Clearly, imvelos considers them a disc feature and they should be treated as such. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,639 |
| Posted: | | | | Hopefully, the next release addresses the changes with digital copies and other services which have emerged since the digital copy feature was added ages ago. |
|
Registered: April 1, 2007 | Posts: 185 |
| Posted: | | | | This is why I didn't think "digital copies" should be included...because much of the time they expire. This one is from The hunger Games and could easily still be sitting on a shelf at HMV or somewhere similar. I don't think temporary content should be included in DVD Profiler at all. | | | Last edited: by 69samael69 |
|
Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | Excellent point 69samael69, and I completely agree with you. | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | profiles always been how originally released... I see this no different then releases originally released with slip cover..then all the sudden without one. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Those dates don't see to be enforced, anyway/ |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | No they don't I just added some that say they expired in like 2013... but still worked just fine. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,639 |
| Posted: | | | | A lot of the DC expiration dates continue to be extended. |
|