Does "Digitally Remastered" qualify as a Title, Edition?

I could imagine it as an edition, if there is an older release and there is a significant improvement in sound and/or video quality or sound arrangement (e.g. 5.1 instead of 2.0, DTS HD Master Audio instead of MPEG or from the feature Metropolis as an example, there exist many restaurations with significant differences in video quality - but, hence, none of them is named Digitally Remastered ).

I agree that digitally mastered for DVD/BluRay material per se is redundant. But remastered could result in another release - in our wording edition...

I think it depends. If it explicitly says "Remastered Edition" or "Digitally Remastered Collector's Edition" I would say yes. If it just says Digitally Remastered, then that would be a different story I guess.

No, it's just marketing hype.

so all of these would be incorrect

Quoting ateo357:

Quote:

A Nightmare on Elm Street: Digitally Remastered

Region 1

Released: 9/7/1999

Anamorphic 1.85:1

This version of A Nightmare on Elm Street was the first DVD release (2 weeks before any other versions) So unless it says Digitally Remastered as a collector it's secondary. So this is a 1st edition.

We already have a release date so there is no need to point out editions just because they came first.

Quoting GSyren:

Quote:
Quoting ateo357:

Quote:
This version of A Nightmare on Elm Street was the first DVD release (2 weeks before any other versions) So unless it says Digitally Remastered as a collector it's secondary. So this is a 1st edition.

Does that mean that the following editons are not digitally remastered? Otherwise it seems to me that you're saying that edition can be just any random text that appears on one edition and not on another.

You are absolutly right. No need for random text in the edition field. (2-Disc, 4-Film Favorites, The Skulls Trilogy, 6 Movie pack). We wouldn't want Digitally Remastered mucking up the edition field.