Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | Like the title says. I haven't figured out who this is yet (and it could be an error as another girl looks just like her, but I haven't watched the film yet, just the credits), but if this is a person not credited anywhere else (the character doesn't appear in the end credit scroll, just in this pre-end credit sequence of pictures), would it be as uncredited? All other names are clear as day, just this one blurred out. The movie is Muck if that helps, but she isn't listed on the official site either (although only about 1/3 of cast are even mentioned there). | | | Last edited: by bigdaddyhorse |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | How odd. Perhaps the person didn't want to be credited and demanded that her name be blurred out or perhaps it's an artistic effect by the director.
In either case, unless you can really verify who the actress is I would leave her out since her name is unknown. As far as I can tell we can't credit unknowns. |
|
Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | So with what I now know about his movie, I'm still kinda stumped. This is the middle part of a trilogy, but this character is hardly seen, in fact, I don't know if her face is ever shown except maybe the end credits. The rest is her legs, butt and boobs. Maybe she was a body double for an as yet uncast role in the prequel (maybe sequel also, I don't think she died in the film, but the killers had her and it's so freaking hard to follow and non-sensical I don't know why I'm bothering to try and make sense of it). No early help from imdb as no Ava credited yet on the next one. I wanted to like this, and almost did. |
|