Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
Steelbooks and Variants
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorVoltaire53
Missed again!
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,293
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
There has been a bit of a long running argument on here in the Steelbook collector community, what the image scans for Steelbooks should look like - some want to use the 'plain steel' image (as that is what a collector would display on the shelf), others want to follow the 'usual rule' and interpret a J-card or the paper that wraps around the case as a partial slip cover and should be included in the scan.

I've not seen *too* much falling out over rear covers being allowed to use the J-card or paper slip but I certainly have more than a few where one type is in the Db and any changes to the front scan are voted down by members of the opposing faction (resulting in no change as the Rules are not 100% clear and screeners go with the No votes)

We now have the opportunity to please both sides using the Variants capabilities but does (for example) a J-card with the Ratings on but other than that matching the Steel image underneath measure up to "Two or more releases of the same title with largely different cover images" or is that covered by the fact that the back cover *is* largely different? (Personally I think so)

I think it would be nice to say Yes we can use Variant Rules and keep both sides happy but it would be even better if that was explicit in the Rules for voting purposes.

Thoughts?... Preferrably avoiding 'Steelbook/Case Type' Collecting is stupid so who cares?
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsurfeur51
Since July 3, 2003
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
France Posts: 4,479
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I voted for "No threy are not variants; use pplain steel for front, use J-card/paper wrap for rear to show information".

With two spelling mistakes, it is clearly the proposal which is the more in the spirit of the rules... 
Images from movies
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,736
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Well, here Ken spoke out against using variants if the only difference is the presence or lack of a slip cover. If a full slip cover doesn't qualify, I'm assuming that a "J-card" doesn't qualify either...
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCubbyUps
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 4,245
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
In my opinion the scans should duplicate how the package looked sitting on store shelves sans stickers.

So, if the J-card wraps around to the front then it should be included.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantNo-way
Way to go!
Registered: March 23, 2011
Posts: 462
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting surfeur51:
Quote:
I voted for "No threy are not variants; use pplain steel for front, use J-card/paper wrap for rear to show information".

With two spelling mistakes, it is clearly the proposal which is the more in the spirit of the rules... 


How can you know they are spelling mistakes? How can you know his intention with that?   
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbigdaddyhorse
Registered: June 21, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,621
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
We need variant covers within a profile instead of variant new profiles, then we can have both and everyone can use the art they like best. As it is now, I don't think this qualifies for variant status, if'n I'm feeling the rule correctly. We'll see as I put in my first re-issue cover. Don't have many redos, but I do have a couple.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
In my opinion the scans should duplicate how the package looked sitting on store shelves sans stickers.

So, if the J-card wraps around to the front then it should be included.

^ this
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorVoltaire53
Missed again!
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,293
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Well, here Ken spoke out against using variants if the only difference is the presence or lack of a slip cover. If a full slip cover doesn't qualify, I'm assuming that a "J-card" doesn't qualify either...


The way I read that was Ken was assuming the slip had the same image as what was underneath; on steelbooks the rear of the slip is totally different as underneath there is no overview; no EAN etc so the it's not the presence or lack of a slip, it's the fact that the rear cover *does* differ totally.
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong
Invelos Software, Inc. RepresentativeKen Cole
Invelos Software
Registered: March 10, 2007
United States Posts: 4,282
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote:
The way I read that was Ken was assuming the slip had the same image as what was underneath; on steelbooks the rear of the slip is totally different as underneath there is no overview; no EAN etc so the it's not the presence or lack of a slip, it's the fact that the rear cover *does* differ totally.


Correct. If the cover is largely different, it qualifies.
Invelos Software, Inc. Representative
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,736
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Ken Cole:
Quote:
Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote:
The way I read that was Ken was assuming the slip had the same image as what was underneath; on steelbooks the rear of the slip is totally different as underneath there is no overview; no EAN etc so the it's not the presence or lack of a slip, it's the fact that the rear cover *does* differ totally.


Correct. If the cover is largely different, it qualifies.

That only prompts the question whether these steelbooks should be scanned with or without the J-card. As Voltaire53 indicates: the EAN/UPC and the overview are generally on that J-card, while the back of the steelbook is empty. First we need to agree on whether that J-card should be part of the scans. Only if you concede that including them is optional, a follow-up question arises that says: "well, can we then use variants to have both the version with the J-card, and the version without the J-card in the database?"
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,018
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Aren't variants intended to deal with different releases? Such as a re-release without slip cover? That doesn't seem to be the case here. IMHO what we need is just a clear instruction one way or the other, nothing more.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,736
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
Aren't variants intended to deal with different releases? Such as a re-release without slip cover? That doesn't seem to be the case here. IMHO what we need is just a clear instruction one way or the other, nothing more.

Indeed. There's no re-release in play here - we're talking about one item, with one kind of packaging. There are just two camps that do and that don't want to include the J-card as part of the cover scan. That's the questions that needs to be answered. Previous poll here, nicely illustrating how divided people are over this. The poll results in this thread are a lot clearer...
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDoubleDownAgain
I see better with 'em on
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
Canada Posts: 1,272
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Ken said something about having another way with dealing with releases that had a slip cover initially and later without it.  Hopefully this will fall into that, having the option to choose covers?

FWIW I'm in the camp of including the J-card (NOT A SLIPCOVER!!!) in the pics, but if the rule was to do it without it, that would be fine.  I can see points for either or, just wish there was a clear rule in that regard.
HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U  AVR: Onkyo TR-707
Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors  Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800
BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free)  HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander
BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii
Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorcorleone
Registered: March 14, 2007
Germany Posts: 20
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
For steelbooks i would like it best, if front and back could be contributed with AND without the JCover. I think the JCover ist important in the contrbution because it has the technical data, overview, UPC/EAN and other facts on it. But as a collector i would also like to have the backside without the JCover. Collectors buy the steelbooks, because they have nicer artwork on them and i would like to see that in DVDProfiler.

Has the possibilty ever been discussed to include multiple (at least 2) versions of the front- and backcover to a dvd profile? That yould be nice for steelbook and also for releases with a slipcover.
Of course i understand that this would require changes to the dvdprofler software AND the database, but this could resolve the problem.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next