Ok here is another one, it is not based on the filter. But based on the rules, in particular the honorific rule It seems to me that common names should be calculated based on the following. I see these a lot in documentaries where in some they use the honorific and sometimes don't. But it does happen in movies and TV shows. Dwight D. Eisenhower General Dwight D. Eisenhower Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower President Dwight D. Eisenhower Dwight David Eisenhower General Dwight David Eisenhower Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower President Dwight David Eisenhower It seems to me the titles/profiles should be counted together based on what would be the common name after the honorific rule is applied. The counts for these would be counted as Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote:
Dwight D. Eisenhower General Dwight D. Eisenhower Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower President Dwight D. Eisenhower
The counts for these would be counted as Dwight David Eisenhower Quote:
Dwight David Eisenhower General Dwight David Eisenhower Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower President Dwight David Eisenhower
In my mind the main logic in combining the counts is simply since the rules have the specific honorific rule that forces the common name, but when the person has several honorifics that would yield common names we have to accurately figure out which one to use. In my mind it is the same as abiding what the filter does as far as our counts. But this one is rule based Thoughts? |