Here is the deal with those
The rules are clear in that the child profiles are optional and not required.
So given that, the "Complete Series" or a set with "multiple TV seasons" can only be treated as a traditional box set if there are valid (required) children.
That would mean each season is in UPC based packaging.
Since the TV disc ID base profiles are optional and the rules for those profiles state that that data must roll up and additionally be in the parent profile indicates that parents cannot be TV disc ID based profiles, and of the three profile types (manual, UPC/EAN, Disc ID) the only other type of profile that is contributable parent is a UPC/EAN based profile.
Here ae some examples of sets where the seasons are in UPC based packaging
Andromeda (Complete Series) 9-318500-036544
Farscape: The Complete Series 733961-256383
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: Seasons 1-7 097360-423341
Star Trek: Voyager: Seasons One - Seven 097360-553741
If the only children are optional then the parent must be able to stand on it's own and treated as a regular TV set.
To not roll up the cast and crew to the parent in these types of sets is a clear violation of the rule that allows for chid profiles.
Quote:
Individual profiles for each disc may be submitted if desired, but this is not required. Add these profiles to the box set contents of the parent profile. Create each of these individual profiles in line with the standard Contribution Rules with one exception - Cover Images. If a disc, or set of discs, have their own case, use the cover images from that case. When submitting a change to an existing TV series profile that is currently a box set, do not remove the existing contents.
In either case, the cast and crew are to be entered into the parent profile using appropriate episode dividers.
Here are some examples where the seasons are not in UPC based packaging
Battlestar Galactica: The Complete Series 025192-010378
Deadwood: The Complete Series 883929-1421320
Lost: The Complete Collection 786936-802368
Rome: The Complete Series 883929-074617
The Sopranos: The Complete Series 883929-225378
Stargate SG-1 027616-092489
Stargate Atlantis: The Complete Series 883904-245254
Torchwood: The Complete Original UK Series 883929-191567
The Tudors: The Complete Series 097360-733044
The West Wing: The Complete Series 012569-820005
The Wire: The Complete Series 883929-225392
Unfortunately for those that do prefer the data being child profiles have to delete it locally for the parent to create the box set model. But not having the data in the parent clearly leaves a larger task for those that do not like child profiles. But this is not something new. If it were a single series with a parent it would be the same premise.
But it is clear, based on the BD/DVD combo rule and the TV child rule that Invelos wants these types of disc ID based child profiles to be optional. So unless there are changes to the rules it is what it is.
Every 6 to 8 months (it seems) a thread gets opened up on this and the same debate goes on.
Unfortunately for those that do prefer the data being child profiles have to delete it locally for the parent to create the box set model. But not having the data in the parent clearly leaves a larger task for those that do not like child profiles. But this is not something new. If it were a single series with a parent it would be the same premise.
But it is clear, based on the BD/DVD combo rule and the TV child rule that Invelos wants these types of disc ID based child profiles to be optional. So unless there are changes to the rules it is what it is.
Every 6 to 8 months (it seems) a thread gets opened up on this and the same debate goes on.
In the rules for TV there is a built in redundancy as the data is concerned whether you are talking a multi season set or even a single season set (the same parent/child data redundancy exists). Done to accommodate both types of users (those that like child profiles and those do not) and minimizing the work each type of user would have to do to locally make the profile as they choose. Is it perfect, no. But it is what we have.