Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 499 |
| Posted: | | | | I recently submitted a contribution to add a group to a cast list and received several No votes saying that the group end divider I put in was not needed and against the rules. I disagree with this, but I withdrew the contribution and decided to see what the general population thinks. This was a contribution for Angel series four disc 1, containing 4 episodes. The group in question is the last set of cast members for the third episode, and directly following it are the new episode divider and the cast for the fourth episode. First, here is a screenshot that shows what DVD Profiler looks like with the group end in, as I submittted. As you can see, everything looks nice - the group is indented and the cast members for the next episode are correctly aligned to the left. Now, a screenshot if you remove the group end divider. See how the members of the episode after the group are indented as though they are part of the group even though they they should not be. Just for fun, I added a fictional group divider to the following episode. With the otiginal group end omitted, the following group keeps the same indentation as the cast, and things are out of alignment until the group end divider. All this shows that the program needs the group end divider as I had submitted. As far as the rule is concerned, it states "Groups should be ended with a "Group End" type divider, unless the next entry begins a new group. Do not add a group end divider at the end of the cast, or at the end of a crew section." There are two relevant parts here: 1. Groups should be ended with a "Group End" type divider, unless the next entry begins a new group. In this case, the next entry does not begin a new group but a new episode, so a group end divider is needed. 2. Do not add a group end divider at the end of the cast, or at the end of a crew section. The way I understand this, and the way that DVD Profiler currently works, the phrase "end of the cast" does not mean the end of the cast of the episode, but the end of the entire cast listing for the disc. I can see where the other interpretation can be made, but it makes no sense with the way the software is programmed, as seen in the screenshots above. Ok, so can of worms opened. Any thoughts? | | | I don't wanna be like everyone else, that's why I'm a mod, see? |
|
Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't see a can of worms needs to be opened the way I see the group divider rules Quote:
•Groups should be ended with a "Group End" type divider, unless the next entry begins a new group. Do not add a group end divider at the end of the cast, or at the end of a crew section.
First of all you are not at end of cast since the cast for the profile includes multiple episodes. End of cast for the profile has not been reached in the case you cite. And it should end with a group end since the next entry is a new episode divider and not a new group It looks like it is covered to me and the people voting NO were incorrect | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
|
Registered: April 14, 2007 | Posts: 415 |
| Posted: | | | | Looks like a bug to me |
|
Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting jmbox: Quote: Looks like a bug to me Although Invelos could code for that the rules do not state a end group divider is not supposed to be there. On fact the rule states that groups will end with the group end divider UNLESS certain criteria are met and that is the next entry after the group end is another group divider or end of cast. I think the main interpretation is "end of cast" and in my opinion in a multi film/tv show disc end of cast is end of cast for the profile. Not each episode individually. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I have always read that to mean that each episode (or movie for more then 1 movie per single side) is the end of a cast list... so no group end dividers for any of the features of the disc. So at least until Ken states otherwise... that is how I will contribute and vote.
I see nothing in the rules that makes me think it is the end of the entire field only. I see it as there is 4 separate features on this disc... each containing individual cast lists.
This is nothing more then a format bug that Ken needs to fix in the program itself. You will notice that the name of the name of the divider does not continue on into the next episode. So the divider does do it's main job... it just don't stop the indent of the names.
Now if Ken want to clarify it that he meant the end of the entire cast field... no matter how many cast lists there is... that is all well and good. But till that time I will continue to contribute and vote as I read it. | | | Pete | | | Last edited: by Addicted2DVD |
|
Registered: March 21, 2007 | Posts: 392 |
| Posted: | | | | The way you handle it is completely per the rules, for me! The rules distinguish between Episode divider and Group divider! Quote: Use Episode dividers for TV show episodes, distinct films, or other logical episodic distinction. Also use episode dividers for full cast division, such as "Japanese Voices". Use Group dividers to designate cast grouped in the credits such as "Soldiers" or "Additional Cast". So, in the case you have described, it is correct per the rules to end the group with a Group End divider. | | | Hardy
Panasonic TX-65DXW904 and Panasonic DMP-UB704 DVD Profiler 4.0.0 Build 1657, macOS High Sierra with Parallels Desktop 11 DVD Profiler 4.0.4, iPhone X, iOS 12 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 554 |
| Posted: | | | | Interesting! I submitted similar changes to a few profiles recently (actually, for the same show!) and I hadn't noticed this. Looking at it again, I can confirm the observations. Should I withdraw them all and resubmit with the group end divider or fix them later after they go through? | | | My DVD/Blu-ray Collection My Letterboxd Page | | | Last edited: by Rizor |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I still do not believe group end dividers belongs if they are at the end of the cast list (either of the cast lists) per the rules. I for one would vote no to any like these. | | | Pete |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't believe that we're supposed to use group end divider at the end of an episode's cast list either. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a bug in the program, and I'd rather see the bug fixed than to apply some sort of manual workaround that'll only have to be undone later on. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Yup... it is a bug that definitely needs to be fixed. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: | | | | Looks like it to, also | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | If it is a bug - it needs to be fixed.
If it isn't fixed, then the end divider needs to be used. Changing the formatting of Episode Cast to Group Cast is unacceptable.
Which, imho, doesn't violate the rules as Scooter1836 and awilbohk explained.
They may be dividers but they are completely different things. There is a difference and they needed to be treated as such.
Edited for a spelling error. | | | Last edited: by Kathy |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I understand where you are coming from... it isn't about the different kind of dividers... but that it is the end of the cast for that episode. Some believe that isn't enough... that there just can't be an end divider at the very end of the cast field. Not the feature. Others of us believe that it can't be used at the end of any of the features on the disc.
Which is something only Ken can clarify. Until such time as Ken clarifies I have to vote and contribute per how I read the rules. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Well what we need at this point is a clarification form Invelos on what "end of the cast" means.
If it means the "end of cast" of the profile then it is currently working as designed and an episode divider does not imply an "end of cast" to the previous section and therefore as the rules state a group end divider should be used in this case
If the usage of an episode divider imples a "end of cast" to what was previosly listed then ther eis a display bug that needs to be fixed.
It could be interpreted either way. Ken should chime in and confirm if this is a bug or a simple interpretation "end of cast".
But one thing, in a series of forum searches I have found nothing that states an episode divider imples an "end of cast" to the previous section and a new "Beginning of cast" . But we absolutely know there is a beginning and end to the cast section in the profile as a whole. It is all in what you want to infer. But it does need clarified so we know how to proceed | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
|
Registered: March 21, 2007 | Posts: 392 |
| Posted: | | | | Maybe it is a bug or maybe it is not a bug. Only Invelos could make a decision.
But as long as there is no decision I will use the Group End divider in this specific case. Because that's the only way that all Episodes get equated. And not that one is indented and one not. | | | Hardy
Panasonic TX-65DXW904 and Panasonic DMP-UB704 DVD Profiler 4.0.0 Build 1657, macOS High Sierra with Parallels Desktop 11 DVD Profiler 4.0.4, iPhone X, iOS 12 | | | Last edited: by awilbohk |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 499 |
| Posted: | | | | It may or may not be a bug/display issue. I know that I have approved contributions in my collection going both with and without the end divider so there is certainly no consistency in how the screeners judge things.
I would be fine with it either way as long as we can get clarification and know for certain. | | | I don't wanna be like everyone else, that's why I'm a mod, see? |
|