| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Good morning, Sirs,
what is correct?
Love, bbbbb | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,650 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well, the bulk of the film is 2.40:1 but the IMAX filmed scenes are 1.78:1 so I predict a million pages of retarded posting. Personally, I would go 2.40:1 locally and lock it whilst writing in the notes section about the IMAX scenes. No matter what you choose, you won't win.  |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting samuelrichardscott: Quote:
the bulk of the film is 2.40:1 but the IMAX filmed scenes are 1.78:1 72 minutes of IMAX footage, 92 minutes in 35mm. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Had exactly this problem and decided for 2.40:1
But surely wouldn't vote "No" if someone removed the Aspect Ratio.
In this case, I fear, there is no "Correct" solution for DVDProfiler | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: June 15, 2012 |  Posts: 428 |
| | Posted: | | | | I just submitted an update to the existing profile that I have of this yesterday, the original didn't have an aspect ratio, I decided 2.40:1 So we'll see if it gets accepted...
Problem is it's also a combo pack so there's dvd stuff mixed in with blu-ray. Interestingly as well, the original profile was submitted Nov 28th and approved Nov 27th :-) |
|
| Registered: September 29, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting samuelrichardscott: Quote:
so I predict a million pages of retarded posting. I gotta remember not to read funny stuff while trying to drink something.  | | | My one wish for the DVD Profiler online database: Ban or remove the disc-level profiles of TV season sets. It completely screws up/inflates the CLT.
FACT: Imdb is WRONG 70% of the time! Misspelled cast, incomplete cast, wrong cast/crew roles. So for those who want DVD Profiler to be "as perfect as Imdb", good luck with that.
Stop adding UNIT crew! They're invalid credits. Stop it! | | | | Last edited: by huskersports |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | What does it say the aspect ratio is on the back of the box? If there is a question as to which of these two it should be, shouldn't the packaging over-rule one or the other? |
|
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
Quoting samuelrichardscott:
Quote:
the bulk of the film is 2.40:1 but the IMAX filmed scenes are 1.78:1
72 minutes of IMAX footage, 92 minutes in 35mm. That averages out to 2.05. |
|
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,870 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting huskersports: Quote:
Quoting samuelrichardscott:
Quote:
so I predict a million pages of retarded posting.
I gotta remember not to read funny stuff while trying to drink something. LOL same here, I was just drinking coffee when I read this However on the bright side TRON:Legacy was in the same boat with mixed IMAX scenes and it looks like we did the AR of the majority of the film so we did the same thing that is being discussed |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:
Quote:
Quoting samuelrichardscott:
Quote:
the bulk of the film is 2.40:1 but the IMAX filmed scenes are 1.78:1
72 minutes of IMAX footage, 92 minutes in 35mm.
That averages out to 2.05. Tongue in cheek...I hope | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote:
Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:
Quote:
Quoting samuelrichardscott:
Quote:
the bulk of the film is 2.40:1 but the IMAX filmed scenes are 1.78:1
72 minutes of IMAX footage, 92 minutes in 35mm.
That averages out to 2.05.
Tongue in cheek...I hope I'm sorry. I messed up my math. It should be 2.14. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yikes hes serious | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would probably pick none as it's variable but I don't care how it's done online, nor do I intend to vote on any such changes. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think we should use the outside edges of any content to measure AR. That would make this 1.78:1. If any part of the movie uses the 2.4 matte area, it's not 2.4. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting GreyHulk: Quote:
What does it say the aspect ratio is on the back of the box? If there is a question as to which of these two it should be, shouldn't the packaging over-rule one or the other? My box says: "1080p High Definition 16x9 Variable 2.40:1 and 1.78:1 (IMAX® Sequences)". | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,131 |
| | Posted: | | | | Leave it empty would be the logical choice. Until there is a multiple selection for w/s aspect ratio.
But that won't happen. There will be 5 pages of arguing back and forth, then when it seems everyone might be in agreement, then someone new will reply something to throw it in a tailspin again.
Before the inevitable happens.
I would like to thank bx5=0 for another discussion that gets the community arguing back and forth.
Didn't your dad every tell you about sleeping dogs. |
|