| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,279 |
| | Posted: | | | | So which version of the rules are we using on this site?
They state updated 12 March, with the revision history showing Feb. But a quick scan suggests they are the same as the ones on the old site? | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,372 |
| | Posted: | | | | there appear to be some minor changes of them to match the new program (Description changed to Edition for one) but yes, they are the old rules from what I see |
|
 | Dan W | | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 980 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'll bet we will be writing a completely new set of rules, soon.
After-all, this is a new company. | | | | Dan |
|
| Dan W | | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 980 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote:
So which version of the rules are we using on this site?
They state updated 12 March, with the revision history showing Feb. But a quick scan suggests they are the same as the ones on the old site? Rules | | | | Dan |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,279 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dan W: Quote:
Quoting Lithurge:
Quote:
So which version of the rules are we using on this site?
They state updated 12 March, with the revision history showing Feb. But a quick scan suggests they are the same as the ones on the old site?
Rules I think you misunderstood, I knew they were there I was just asking what they were actually based on, as I knew a revision was submitted to Ken a while ago on the old site. | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dan W: Quote:
I'll bet we will be writing a completely new set of rules, soon.
After-all, this is a new company. God I hope not. The submitted rule revisions are already out of date but I hope, with Ken's help, we can work on revising the current rules to work with the new program rather than a complete rewrite. That would be a complete nightmare.  | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | No complete rewrite, just some focused changes relating to the new fields/changes for now. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
No complete rewrite, just some focused changes relating to the new fields/changes for now.   | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar | | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,436 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting lyonsden5: Quote:
there appear to be some minor changes of them to match the new program (Description changed to Edition for one) but yes, they are the old rules from what I see How did you compare them...? I took a quick look (and found the Edition stuff you mentioned), but it appears not to be marked as a change (which would be odd anyway, as this site just started fro scratch...). | | | Achim [諾亞信； Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan.
Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|