| Author |
Message |
| Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,650 |
| | Posted: | | | | How long do you get to 'green' someone?
I just downloaded some headshots from the 28th and the time has already passed! Can we extend it to a month, especially for those of us that are away a lot?
Thanks! |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | Looks to be 48 hours. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yeah... I believe I remember it being said it was 2 days. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
Looks to be 48 hours. Something like that. For the request a clear +1. I would like to have the possibility to also give someone a positive rating, even when the posting is more than 48h ago. |
|
 | Blair | | Resistance is Futile! |
| Registered: October 30, 2008 | | Posts: 1,249 |
| | Posted: | | | | I had never considered that here, but it makes sense when I think of other sites I visit with a "reputation" system.
I wouldn't extend it to indefinite here, but I do recall some other forums I have visited where I found answers or good advice through a search and gave the person a +1 for it even though the post was months (or even years) old, and I never said a word directly to that person. | | | If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you.
He who MUST get the last word in on a pointless, endless argument doesn't win. It makes him the bigger jerk. | | | | Last edited: by Blair |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yeah... I would support a longer time as well. | | | | Pete |
|
| Muckl | | That's my common name. |
| Registered: April 9, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 858 |
| |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 6,018 |
| |
| Registered: February 23, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,580 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would also support this. Aside from the forums, I green every constructive vote I get on my contributions. That means that in one day, I can only green less than half of the remarks and sometimes I just can't green everyone fast enough before the opportunity is lost. | | | Blu-ray collection
DVD collection
My Games
My Trophies |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Taro: Quote:
I would also support this. Aside from the forums, I green every constructive vote I get on my contributions. That means that in one day, I can only green less than half of the remarks and sometimes I just can't green everyone fast enough before the opportunity is lost. I know this problem, but I always try to green the helpful votes at the end of the day, because of the longer opportunity to green a contribution vote. |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | There have been quite a few times where I wish I could drop a green after it expired. I definitely like this idea. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: October 2, 2008 | | Posts: 210 |
| | Posted: | | | | i support this two. 2 days is not enough to be able to give a check or X if you don't read the posts right away. |
|
| Blair | | Resistance is Futile! |
| Registered: October 30, 2008 | | Posts: 1,249 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'd give you a green for this idea Sam.... but my time ran out  | | | If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you.
He who MUST get the last word in on a pointless, endless argument doesn't win. It makes him the bigger jerk. |
|