|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 ...11 Previous Next
|
Need some backup here for others who don't understand enhanced widescreen |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | I was attempting to change the misaligned aspect ratio for Spielberg's A.I. #667068-956726 and have run into a situation where a few of us here don't care what the packaging states, or a dozen and a half websites report. and that is the aspect ratio for the Theatrical release of A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001) is by academy flat ratio of 1.85:1 , and the DVD is enhanced to 1.78., meaning it has been altered by anamorphic enhanced image to just fit nicely inside your 16 x 9 box,, No bars .. It is the way the the Industry would like to keep all of us fairly happy with those rotten black bars.. There are numerous websites and some good ones that properly explain this.. There are bound to be other widescreen films such as sizes 2:00 and all the way up to... (gasp) 2.89 that can be anamorphic., ( so it doesn't physically look squeezed or zoomed) but those films WILL have the notorious black bars top and bottom. I have gotten to be quite good in my years and do not have to 'bring out a measuring tape to see what the ratio is', My eye and a properly set up monitor will be just fine for me.. ( hence my moniker) .. BUT this past day I have had a few numerous forum members here who will not take my contribution seriously, and absolutely insist 'if they don't see black bars 'even the slightest,, from 1.85 then it has to be 1.78 . MY argument is: the image they are viewing is a 'mock up' that we get when we buy and use a DVD (of the same film) that is anamorphically enhanced to fit 1.78 . In other words hook up that player without using HDMI or component wires and the image will be letterbox.. and in this case as the Box states 1.85 and numerous websites also use that ratio.. The trick word here is enhanced.., meaning it has been 'altered' from 1.85 down to 1.78 so the image is 16 x 9 ready .. If I'm wrong on this.. I'll change my moniker to something else ., since that is the route a lot of us are taking these days when we don't seem to get our own way ... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote: (...) BUT this past day I have had a few numerous forum members here who will not take my contribution seriously, and absolutely insist 'if they don't see black bars 'even the slightest,, from 1.85 then it has to be 1.78 . (...)
If you are going to post, and complain about voters, the least you could do is state all the facts. You made the contribution with the following notes: "actual aspect ratio". The no voters, of which I was one, simply asked you to provide your verification method. I don't know about anybody else, but I did not insist "'if I don't see black bars, even the slightest from 1.85, then it has to be 1.78." In fact, even though I read your first PM, by the time I had a chance to go back and look at your updated notes, you had already pulled the contribution in a huff. Speaking for myself, if you can't be bothered to provide a source, I can't be bothered to take your contribution seriously. Had you provided useful notes, something along the lines of "Corrected aspect ratio per back of case as there is no proof that the case is incorrect," I probably would have voted 'yes'. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 37 |
| Posted: | | | | All I see on the digital bits web site is an explanation of what "16x9 enhanced" means. "16x9 enhanced" has absolutely nothing to do with the aspect ratio that's on the disc. The film may still be 1.78:1, 1.85:1, 2.35:1 or whatever.
It is true that the correct AR for A.I. is 1.85:1. But that's simply not what's on the disc, no matter how you connect your player to your TV. And it's very common practice for every studio to blow up or open the mattes of an 1.85:1 film for their DVD presentation. Warner Home Video is a prime example, while Sony usually presents the film in the correct 1.85:1 ratio... with slight black bars on the top and bottom. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 37 |
| Posted: | | | | Top: A.I. @ 1.78:1, Bottom: Hudson Hawk @ 1.85:1, both "16:9 enhanced": |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks CPreishl, your example is very illustrative of what I've been trying to explain to Terry in PM. Now, if A.I. is really 1.85:1 I don't know (I haven't checked) but the least one can do is to verify the information first hand if you attempt to change an existing profile. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | I should add that for an initial contribution I would of course be willing to accept whatever is printed on the case, until such time as someone can verify the information. I just feel that to make a change, you have to provide some kind of source other than information on the cover. For all we know, the existing data might have come from someone who actually performed a visual verification from the disc (the notes don't tell the whole story as the profile is older than the Invelos forum). | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | I guess i don't understand the problem.
If it's 1.78:1 on screen that's what I report. If it's something else, on screen, I report that. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote: I guess i don't understand the problem.
If it's 1.78:1 on screen that's what I report. If it's something else, on screen, I report that. My problem with that is that different screens can report the image differently due to overscan/faults/etc... This is one area where I don't like personal opinions of just watching the title & changing based on ones personal set up. |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CPreischl: Quote: All I see on the digital bits web site is an explanation of what "16x9 enhanced" means. "16x9 enhanced" has absolutely nothing to do with the aspect ratio that's on the disc. The film may still be 1.78:1, 1.85:1, 2.35:1 or whatever.
It is true that the correct AR for A.I. is 1.85:1. But that's simply not what's on the disc, no matter how you connect your player to your TV. And it's very common practice for every studio to blow up or open the mattes of an 1.85:1 film for their DVD presentation. Warner Home Video is a prime example, while Sony usually presents the film in the correct 1.85:1 ratio... with slight black bars on the top and bottom. This is 100% correct. Enhanced has nothing to do with the aspect ratio, it only means the film is enhanced for wirdescreen tvs. If yout tv is not doing some overscan (which alot do sadly), it definitely means, if there are NO black bars it is 1.78, if there are the small black bars like in Hudson hawk, it is 1.85. And again, of course the original aspect ratio of A.I. is 1.85, but on the DVD it is 1.78 cheers Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | But how can you truly measure the aspect ratio if you are using two separate and different setups.?. . I like what patsa told me., if he only has a stereo setup why use 5.1? .. Exactly.. If you only have a widescreen TV that will provide an overscan of a 1:85 (i.e. 5.1) down to 1.78 (i.e. 2.0) why would you insist on contributing just what your system delivers? If you have two setups ( one coaxial /rca video), and the other HDMI/component delivered to a 16 x 9 monitor, you will have two ratios.. BUT the true aspect ratio burnt to the film print is ,and was 1:85.1 .. This is what I am trying to convey here. I will submit again with sources and let's see where the chips fall ... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| Posted: | | | | To measure aspect ratio I use a software player on my computer. No problems with overscan and the like, I simply make a screenshot with the player software and and devide the number of horizontal pixels by the number of vertical pixels of the visible picture. | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
| | | Last edited: by DJ Doena |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with DJ Doena here. What equipment you have in your home theatre and what its settings are is irrelevant. What counts is what is on the disc. All you need is a reliable method of verifying what's on disc. DJ Doena has mentioned one.
I can think of very few instances where you would actually need to use your home theatre to verify DVDP data. The distinction between DD Stereo and DD Surround comes to mind. | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: I can think of very few instances where you would actually need to use your home theatre to verify DVDP data. The distinction between DD Stereo and DD Surround comes to mind. You can't tell surround from stereo with your ears?? | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote: I guess i don't understand the problem.
If it's 1.78:1 on screen that's what I report. If it's something else, on screen, I report that. we could if we wanted--,, go through the 1:85 films that are already in the data base as enhanced 1:78 and change them all to 1:78 . (thousands) . can you imagine the uproar?? .. won't happen.. but the flip side should .(few hundred) .. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CPreischl: Quote: Top: A.I. @ 1.78:1, Bottom: Hudson Hawk @ 1.85:1, both "16:9 enhanced":
just looked over your images and scanned artwork for all three films in data base.., besides the fact that they are Sony* brands.., No where on the box does it says 'enhanced' only 'widescreen 1:85' ., *Sony really doesn't care about true aspect ratio/transfers as their video catalogue has always been throughly hacked.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: To measure aspect ratio I use a software player on my computer. No problems with overscan and the like, I simply make a screenshot with the problem and and devide the number of horizontal pixels by the number of vertical pixels of the visible picture. I agree that this is the best way to do it. If you can't measure the aspect ratio yourself, then you shouldn't change the setting. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 ...11 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|