As far as I'm aware, the higher rating always takes precedence which would mean you have to mark the profile as "Unrated" even though there is also a rated version.

Edit: from the rules: "When there is no rating, or an unrated version of the film on the disc, use the NR rating."

My apologies. I'm still not used to the new fields.
If the details are from a valid source, then I see no reason not to - it's information directly related to the content of the disc.

Edit: sorry to hear you decided to withdraw - you could have let it run it's course and see what the screeners thought of it. A "no" vote doesn't necessarily automatically mean a rejection.
But this is the problem when people race to fill in the new fields before the rules are updated to accomodate them. I'd have preferred it for Ken to filter out all the new fields from contributions until the rules are set for them.

Quoting TheMovieman:

Quote:

On a side note (and I'm guilty of this as well), can we stop with the "agreed" and "ditto" and just state the reason you're voting no? It'd be fine to say, "I agree with Username, such and such addition is not allowed".

I actually prefer it when people just put "Agree with X" or "Agree with the others". We don't need to have the exact same reasons typed out over and over IMHO.

The downside is of course if the original voter changes their vote, so you end up with a bunch of reasons simply saying "agree" or "ditto".
The worst one I saw was someone saying "If name says no, then no" - I thought, are you too lazy or stupid to make a decision on your own?

No worries. I should have read your first post more carefully.

But if the rated version is on the same disc or profile then the rating details do pertain to the profile.

Quoting Unicus69:

Quote:
Quoting northbloke:

Quote:
My apologies. I'm still not used to the new fields.
If the details are from a valid source, then I see no reason not to - it's information directly related to the content of the disc.

I was one of the no voters.  My reason for the no vote was that, by definition, there can't be rating details for a film that is unrated.

But there can be Unicus... remember? we talked about this before... and I even showed you this picture as proof:

Quote:
The details pertain the the rated version, not the unrated.  So, for the unrated profile, the details should be left blank.

Of course this is another matter... and I would never add Rating Details to an Unrated DVD taken from a Rated version of the movie.

But in the case we are talking here... both versions  being on the disc.... I don't know where I stand... which is why I didn't vote on this when I saw it. Though I would lean to the fact that the Rating used on the profile was NR so the Details should for the unrated version only... which means not adding a rating detail.

Even if the DVD has both R and NR, We use the NR. The NR version does not have any ratings detail because it is not rated so we should not add any ratings detail.