 |
|
|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1  Previous Next
|
|
Media Publisher...If we are going to submit changes, can we at least get it right the first time? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | I am seeing a lot of contributions for this field that, assuming I understand what people were after for this field, are going to need correcting in the future. As an example, I am seeing a ton of contributions where BVHE is simply being moved from the studio field to the publisher field. BVHE is not the 'publisher', it is the distributor...something everyone who wanted this particular field said they didn't care about. Please, if you are going to submit changes to this field, at least take a look at the back of the case to see if there is a 'publisher' logo. If there is, enter that name. I know it is easier to simply copy and paste, but how does that help if the data is wrong?  | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 18, 2007 |  Posts: 103 |
| | Posted: | | | | If I understand correctly the discussion that's been happening in the Contribution Rules forum, Ken has already decided to expand this field to three entries in version 3.5.1. If/when this happens, all companies involved in releasing the DVD - production, distribution etc - will go in that field. Therefore at the moment I don't think it matters particularly if people are putting distributors in the single field we have in 3.5.0, as it will end up in the right place in the next version.
That's the basis I've been using for my votes on contributions anyway. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheFly: Quote:
If I understand correctly the discussion that's been happening in the Contribution Rules forum, Ken has already decided to expand this field to three entries in version 3.5.1. If/when this happens, all companies involved in releasing the DVD - production, distribution etc - will go in that field. Therefore at the moment I don't think it matters particularly if people are putting distributors in the single field we have in 3.5.0, as it will end up in the right place in the next version.
That's the basis I've been using for my votes on contributions anyway. I agree. I would not "correct" them now and then correct them again when 3.5.1 is released. I say just wait. | | | | Hal | | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | I know that he is planning on adding more fields for a future release but, with all due respect to Ken, that release could come next week or it could come next year. In the meantime, I think we should enter the proper data, based on the current rules, into that field. If I am alone in this thinking, I will simply vote neutral on these contributions as a 'yes' vote goes against the current rule. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Posts: 103 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well I think part of the reason for expanding the field to three entries was that nobody could agree on exactly what constitutes a "publisher". Since there's no consensus on that, it's not really possible in my opinion to declare contributions right or wrong. So yes, if you disagree with a change I would just vote neutral until 3.5.1 is released. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I disagree with you, Fly, simply, for now give priority to the eata has it ALWAYS been handled. there are a few users that have gotten Ken to confuse things and as a result have taken a field that has wrked for THREE years and has much data and completely made a total mess of it. Thanks a lot, guys. I see anything other than first priority going to data as we have entered it and I will vte NO, the ummmm data they want can WAIT for more fields.
I am trying to be polite and not call these people what i really think they are. Yes that includes James, amongst others.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Actually, Fly is supporting the same thing you are...simply copy the existing data into the new field and wait, until we get more fields, to enter the new data. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just to clarify my position on this, I think we should be putting in the Media Publisher now as defined in the current Rules, however, I will not vote "no" if the Distributor is put in by mistake and will not try to correct such a mistake by contributing the Media Publisher instead.
Whatever goes in now, will probably need to stay once we get all three fields, so why take it out now and put it back in later. I know it's technically against the current Rules, but we also know that will change in the next version.
Granted we don't know when 3.5.1 is coming, but, personally, I'm going to remain optimistic that it will be sooner rather than later. | | | | Hal |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |