Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Short Circuit (again) I Removed this Credit: Gregg Chapion: Producer with this note in the contribution note: Gregg Chapion: Producer (excluded by the rules: Supervising Producer) One User votes No: Supervising Producer is NOT excluded by the rules. Rules Crew: by production you only find: Producer or Executive Poducer ad no provision for a Supervising Producer like you have for the Supervising Art Director. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Supervising Producer should not be credited in DVDProfiler as per current rules, so your removal is 100% correct IMO... | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Supervising Producer is NOT excluded by the rules. We're tracking supervising art directors, supervising sound editors, supervising re-recording mixers, supervising editors - why then would we possibly decide to leave out a supervising producer? It just doesn't make sense, and it's certainly not addressed in the rules.
Think about it: would you enter a "supervising re-recording mixer"? That credit appears pretty frequently nowadays, and people are unanimously entering them - and quite rightly so, IMHO. So how can you possibly sustain a different policy with regards to a "supervising producer"? Neither are specifically allowed or prohibited by the rules. You can't go around claiming one is prohibited and the other isn't - it's just not true. If we're entering "supervising re-recording mixers", I'm entering "supervising producers" as well - the rules treat them exactly alike, even if that is by not specifically mentioning them. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | I always include Supervising Producers. | | | Hal |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Supervising Art Directors or re-recording mixers, based on credit ordering, seem to fulfill the definition of "supervisor" in that they were in charge of others with the same job. Can the same logic be applied to Producers? Do the Supervising Producers supervise the Producers? Or are they subordinate to Producers but with good negotiating skills to make them sound more important? Those aren't rhetorical questions. I don't know the answers. I don't recall having seen Supervising Producer as a credit before but if i found it listed between the Executive Producers and Producers i might consider submitting with a note but otherwise... I'm reminded of this quote from State & Main Joseph Turner White: What's an associate producer credit? Bill Smith: It's what you give to your secretary instead of a raise. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Supervising Producers are generally superior to Producers but inferior to Executive Producers. As the name suggests the Supervising Producer supervises the normal producers. It's normally used in television production where there can be a large number of producers for a particular series. They still answer to the Executive Producer who oversees the entire production. It's a different role to the Production Supervisor who is a type of Production Manager. As to whether this means we include or exclude them... no idea! | | | Last edited: by northbloke |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote: I'm reminded of this quote from State & Main Joseph Turner White: What's an associate producer credit? Bill Smith: It's what you give to your secretary instead of a raise. I enjoyed that film a great deal! Anyway: that's probably why we don't enter associate producers - something that is specifically addressed in the credits table, unlike supervising producers. Entering supervising producers is not prohibited in any way, and since we track the "supervising" people in all other categories, there's no valid reason to apply a different standard to producers. Oh, and northbloke is absolutely right: "Production Supervisor" is something else entirely. I certainly wouldn't enter those. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote: Supervising Art Directors or re-recording mixers, based on credit ordering, seem to fulfill the definition of "supervisor" in that they were in charge of others with the same job.
Producers are subordinate to Supervising Producers. If you follow the history of say Producer Merri D. Howard, in the first season of ST: Voyager, she is credited as a "Producer". In ST: Enterprise, she has been promoted, and is credited as a "Supervising Producer". This is a common progression. | | | Hal |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree that Supervising Producer gets a Producer credit. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 775 |
| Posted: | | | | It does make sense to include Supervising Producer, based on the other Supervising credits that ARE valid; however, it's not in the grid under acceptable roles, the only one that is is Supervising Art [Director], since Supervising Sound Editor is even given its own separate entry. I can certainly see the case for removal. |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | To end the discussion: Quote rules (Bold by me) Quote: For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section. A Supervising Producer is NOT listed! End of discussion | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: To end the discussion: Quote rules (Bold by me)
Quote: For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section. A Supervising Producer is NOT listed! End of discussion So I'll start stripping all "supervising re-recording mixers" from my profiles, then? And all "art directors" even? 'Cause those aren't listed either. And how about every crew credit in an other language than English? You can't be serious... Apart from that: he is credited with one of those roles - he's credited as a producer. A supervising one, that is, but a producer nonetheless. End of discussion | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: To end the discussion: Quote rules (Bold by me)
Quote: For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section. A Supervising Producer is NOT listed! End of discussion This becomes somewhat of a problem when you look at the table and see that many of the crew roles have NO entries whatsoever. It also means we can't credit 'Art Director' since the only entry for that role is 'Supervising Art'. Sorry, but that argument does not end the debate at all! Nice try though! | | | Hal |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section. role: Art Director (can be credited) Credited as: Supervising Art (can be credited) role: Producer (can be credited) Credited as: Producer, Produced by (can be credited) for the supervising sound mixer and supervising producer there is a problem | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | @T!M: If you follow the rules, yes, you should remove the supervising re-recording mixers. @T!M and hal9g: No, the Art Director is listed, please look at the first row last entry there we have an "Art Director" which also might be credited as "Supervising Art". My goodness, some people try to make a problem out of everything. EDIT: regarding the producer-credit with a prefix, you don't really want to tell that you also credit assistant- and co producers, do you? | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
Quote rules (Bold by me)
Quote: For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section. You've quoted the pertinent part of he Rule yourself. It says "roles listed in the " Film Credits to Include" column." "Art Director" is NOT listed there! If you really want to get technical, there is NO column labeled "Film Credits to Include", so I guess we cannot add any crew credits! | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|