Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1  Previous Next
|
|
What to do about submitting production years for a double feature |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: September 14, 2007 | | Posts: 49 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have run into the problem in dealing with double features where both titles are on the same disc. I'm not sure what do about the production years. I can't seem to leave it blank when submitting the profile and I've tried putting both years separated by a / but it won't accept that. Perhaps I'm missing something. So I thought I would ask here. |
| | Registered: May 8, 2007 |  Posts: 663 |
| | Posted: | | | | Even though the rules don't specify this, I would use the earliest production year. | | | We're on a mission from God.
 |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree... I would also use the earliest production year... as long as both movies are on the same side of the disc. You didn't specify if the movies were both on one side of the disc... or 1 movie on each side of the disc.
If one movie on each side then per the rules this would be considered a boxset... and each movie added by disc ID. | | | | Pete |
| | Registered: September 14, 2007 | | Posts: 49 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks for the replies. I have run into three situations- (1) multiple movies on same side of disc, (2) a movie(s) on each side of a double sided disc, and (3) multiple discs. Should the production year issue be treated differently based on each scenario?
So based on the rules the earliest production year should definitely be used in scenarios 2 and 3 as it would be considered a "box set." (would be helpful to have a link in the production year section of the rules to the note about box sets- I went straight to the film details section of the rules, which discusses production years, but makes no cross-reference to the box set issue). Is the general consensus that the earliest production year should be used in scenario 1 as well? |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yeah... I would think whenever you have more then 1 feature per profile you should use the earliest year... and per rules it is not the production year that you need... it is the year of the Theatrical Release... which could be something entirely different. | | | | Pete |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 670 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting eagle61397: Quote:
Even though the rules don't specify this, I would use the earliest production year. The rules does in fact specify this, as it is a boxset... Quote:
The term "Box Set" is used to define any release that includes more than one film. (Bold text by me) Quote:
Production Year for a Box Set should be the year of the earliest feature release in the set. (Bold text present in rules) | | | | The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. (William Gibson) |
| | Registered: September 14, 2007 | | Posts: 49 |
| | Posted: | | | | Huh. A single disc "box set" seems counterintuitive to me; oh well, at least I know how to deal with the production years now. Thanks. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | It seems counter intuitive, until you think about it and recognize some of the limitations of the Program. And pay close attention to what it says "The term "Box Set" is used to define any release that includes more than one film." Boxset is a TERM and nothing more, it is not descriptive of the packaging, and that is how we define it.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|