Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Desktop Feature Requests Page: 1  Previous   Next
Differentiation in HD audio formats
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTo'yL
and Trouble
Registered: February 26, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I saw some vague mention of this a year ago but not recently.

DVD Profiler needs more differentiation in the number of channels for the HD (Blu-ray) formats and between the DTS-HD formats:

Dolby Digital TrueHD
Dolby TrueHD 5.1
Dolby TrueHD 7.1
DTS-HD
DTS-HD HR 5.1
DTS-HD HR 7.1
DTS-HD MA 5.1
DTS-HD MA 7.1
PCM 7.1

The most common of these are shown in bold. I've so far seen two PCM 7.1 tracks (3:10 to Yuma and Shoot 'Em Up) and one DTS-HD HR 5.1 track (Basic Instinct). The remaining ones I haven't seen but they're theoretically possible so should be included.

Also note that Dolby's lossless format is officially known as "Dolby TrueHD", not "Dolby Digital TrueHD".
One man's rip-off is another man's homage.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTo'yL
and Trouble
Registered: February 26, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Another note: The DTS abbreviations, though common, should probably be expanded since this is how they are listed on cover sheets:

DTS-HD High Resolution 5.1
DTS-HD High Resolution 7.1
DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1
DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1
One man's rip-off is another man's homage.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,195
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
And they are not limited to 5.1 and 7.1 I have several 2.0.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTo'yL
and Trouble
Registered: February 26, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Good catch. I just watched American Psycho and noticed that it uses DTS-HD HR 6.1. So for each of the four (PCM, DTS-HD HR, DTS-HD MA and Dolby TrueHD) there'd be 2.0, 2.1, 5.1, 6.1 and 7.1.
One man's rip-off is another man's homage.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorNewEnglander
Registered: 11/13/2003
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,911
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Would it be easier to go from the two column (Content / Format)

to a three column system of

Content / Codec / Channels ?
Signature banned: Reason out of date...
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTo'yL
and Trouble
Registered: February 26, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
That would be ideal. I'd thought about this, but I was afraid that it might cause compatibility problems between database expansion and users' version transition. On the other hand, I hadn't thought about what you suggested: adding two new fields in the database instead of inheriting the Format field. That would eliminate potential compatibility issues if the current version is able to ignore fields it doesn't recognize.
One man's rip-off is another man's homage.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorJaLe
Registered: March 14, 2007
Finland Posts: 115
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I asked this also in Beta-forum, with no aswers.

My opinion is that this would be really good feature upgrade.
So lets keep up the fuzz also in here.

What is status for this?
Will we get more HD Audio options in 3.5.0, e.g. Dolby TrueHD 7.1 ???
Or are we stick to codec as only option?

NewEnglanders suggestion for three column system gets my vote also.
It is simple and flexible.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantDmitry
Registered: May 22, 2007
Posts: 2
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have to agree, Casablanca HD-DVD (Dolby Digital Plus 1.0) looks really silly with all those 5.1 icons. I imagine the upcoming Blu-Ray edition will be 1.0 as well.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsurfeur51
Since July 3, 2003
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
France Posts: 4,479
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dmitry:
Quote:
I have to agree, Casablanca HD-DVD (Dolby Digital Plus 1.0) looks really silly with all those 5.1 icons. I imagine the upcoming Blu-Ray edition will be 1.0 as well.


This is also true with some DVDs. "Match Point" has DTS 1.0, and it appears with 5 channels icons.
I also support the idea to have separate fields for channels.
Images from movies
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantmatthevil
Registered: July 30, 2008
Posts: 5
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
There are some great audio option improvements in 3.5, thanks for the work! I like the idea of a three column audio selection too. It will reduce the number of codecs listed and allow for more accurate listing of audio options on titles.

I wonder how difficult the SQL script (not sure what type of database is being used) would be to rewrite the format field, for example, of all titles in the online database with Dolby Digital Stereo and Dolby Digital 5.1 to just Dolby Digital then add the appropriate column for channels and default the field to 2.0 or 5.1 or some other default. Anything with a PCM 5.1 index in the format field -> PCM in the format/codec field and add 5.1 to the channel field...etc. But these are suggestions without any knowledge of how the database schema looks.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Desktop Feature Requests Page: 1  Previous   Next