| Author |
Message |
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Q.1
Hugo E Blick ->
Hugo / E. / Blick
OR
Hugo / E / Blick
?
Q.2
Credited As?
Provided the Credit Look-Up Tool shows "Hugo E. Blick", but he is credited as "Hugo E Blick", would you use the Credited As field?
Hugo E. Blick [Hugo E Blick]
OR
just Hugo E. Blick
? | | | | -- Enry |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | Hugo/E./Blick
we now have already users adding spaces Hugo/E. /Blick | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Enry:
Your question is unclear.
You list the data as it appears On Screen PERIOD.
As for the CLT, be very wary, you will, in most cases find a lot of crossover. That is a title which will reflect BOTH listings. While dropping the period is not unheard of in film credits, it is fairly rare, but it is the style of IMDb. So I suspect if you investigated the crossovers you would find a lot of IMDb data that needs to be fixed.
A loty of your questions are old and already dealt with. This one while new also need not really even exist. The above is exactly why my focus is NOT on the CLT at this time BUT on getting the As Credited Data correct. Once that data is CORRECT then the CLT will reflect accurate counts and WILL become useful until then it is very questionable.
In short, all of this to me is putting the cart in front of the horse.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
You list the data as it appears On Screen PERIOD. So you always add a PERIOD after names, right?   [...] Quote:
This one while new also need not really even exist. It exists because I wonder how I should judge a contribution that introduces the Credited As field, as in the example I gave. Quote:
The above is exactly why my focus is NOT on the CLT at this time BUT on getting the As Credited Data correct. I may personally agree with you on that, although the Rules tell us to use the CLT, but it isn't relevant to the question. | | | | -- Enry | | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
It exists because I wonder how I should vote on a contribution that introduces the Credited As field, as in the example I gave. I would say as long as you're happy with the choice of common name, then I see no problem with using "credited as" to show there is no period on screen. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
You list the data as it appears On Screen PERIOD.
So you always add a PERIOD after names, right?
[...]
Quote:
This one while new also need not really even exist.
It exists because I wonder how I should vote on a contribution that introduces the Credited As field, as in the example I gave.
Quote:
The above is exactly why my focus is NOT on the CLT at this time BUT on getting the As Credited Data correct.
I may personally agree with you on that, although the Rules tell us to use the CLT, but it isn't relevant to the question. I think you know better, Enry. I enter the data as it is displayed On Screen whatever. If a period is used, which is seems to be the film norm, I use it, if not...I don't. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
Q.1
Hugo E Blick ->
Hugo / E. / Blick
OR
Hugo / E / Blick
?
Q.2
Credited As?
Provided the Credit Look-Up Tool shows "Hugo E. Blick", but he is credited as "Hugo E Blick", would you use the Credited As field?
Hugo E. Blick [Hugo E Blick]
OR
just Hugo E. Blick
? Per the CLT he is credited as 'Hugo E Blick' in 9 titles, and 'Hugo E. Blick' in 7 titles. Therefore, neither of your choices is correct. He should simply be 'Hugo E Blick'..........no period. Sometimes we get exactly what we ask for. | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Per the CLT he is credited as 'Hugo E Blick' in 9 titles, and 'Hugo E. Blick' in 7 titles. And just to put a spanner in the works, he's plain ol' Hugo Blick in 22 titles! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Per the CLT he is credited as 'Hugo E Blick' in 9 titles, and 'Hugo E. Blick' in 7 titles.
And just to put a spanner in the works, he's plain ol' Hugo Blick in 22 titles! Didn't think to check that!  Hugo Blick [Hugo E Blick] would be correct. | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Per the CLT he is credited as 'Hugo E Blick' in 9 titles,
Just two shows, though: Black Adder s.4 and Jeeves & Wooster s.1. The number goes up to 9 only thanks to Localities. Quote:
and 'Hugo E. Blick' in 7 titles. But three features: there is Batman too. Quote:
Therefore, neither of your choices is correct. Well, not my choices, actually. Someone else's contribution  Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Hugo Blick [Hugo E Blick] would be correct. I definitely agree. More profiles, more titles, more features. I believe the Contributor is reading this thread and will take note of that. | | | | -- Enry | | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 555 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks! I forgot to check plain Hugo Blick without the E., error corrected!
BTW, I have checked the DVDs I own with this guy, and he is credited as follows in these:
Hugo Blick
-The Wind in the Willows/Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Hugo E. Blick
-Batman
Hugo E Blick
-Black Adder (Fourth Series)
-Jeeves & Wooster
Adjusting for these findings, the Credit Lookup tool shows that he is credited as Hugo E. Blick in 1 movie, as Hugo E Blick in 2 TV series, and as Hugo Blick in 1 confirmed movie and 6 other movies/series (which I do not own), i.e. 7 different titles, making Hugo Blick the correct common name at this point. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | This assumes that Hugo and Hugo E (E.) are they same person, which they probably are. BUT they may not be just as easily. And I don't make that assumption.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Think i found a picture of Hugo E. Blick on this site and IMDb confirms that he appears in Batman IMDb |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 555 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
This assumes that Hugo and Hugo E (E.) are they same person, which they probably are. BUT they may not be just as easily. And I don't make that assumption.
Skip It is the same guy; I've visually verified that the Hugo E Blick from Jeeves and Wooster is the same guy as the Hugo E. Blick from Batman, and in this interview with Hugo Blick (no initials) http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/talkwales/transcripts/hugoblick.shtml he confirms he's the guy in Batman. |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | - | | | | -- Enry | | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|