Author |
Message |
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm probably dredging up an old topic I never got involved in, but I've noticed some recent submissions to adjust the cast and crew data for the Lord of the Rings Collector's DVD Gift Sets
Now, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the BOX SET rules should apply to the following UPCs 794043-561139 794043-651021 794043-693328
Because, the ones I bought at least, each contain two titles.
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: Collector's DVD Gift Set - 794043-561139 Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: Special Extended DVD Edition - 7940430-554926 National Geographic: Beyond the Movie: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring - 727994-750284
Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers: Collector's DVD Gift Set - 794043-651021 Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers: Special Extended DVD Edition - 794043-650420 Gollum - Disc ID: 8D3F-88C5-D603-C5CF
Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King: Collector's DVD Gift Set - 794043-693328 Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King: Special Extended DVD Edition 794043-693229 Creating the Lord of the Rings Symphony: A Composer's Journey Through Middle-Earth - Disc ID: FDD3-2A75-C7D9-05A2
Am I missing something here? |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 585 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Leiterfluid: Quote: Am I missing something here? Nope, you are correct. The bolded titles/UPC's you've listed should not have any cast/crew data in them (or much of anything else really). They should follow the boxset rules for those. | | | "Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" - Douglas Bader "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams | | | Last edited: by Vega |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | Agree with Vega. If they have cast and crew, it should be removed. | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Leiter:
You are missing one very important fact LOTR does NOT qualify as a TV series and therfore those Rules do not apply. Strictly Boxset Rules ONLY. The Bonus Features are NOT theatrical releases, they are simply BONUS discs.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 585 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: Doesn't the second disc constitute as "bonus material"? Actually.. hmm. You have a point here. The first is fine because the 2nd item in there has it's own UPC so would qualify for the box set rules. But the other 2 are only by Disc ID and they are strictly bonus materials. The catch is that they are not part of the packaged and UPCed main titles (794043-650420 and 794043-693229). So the question is do they get profiled on their own or should they have just been added to the Special Features listing of the main profiles (the original bolded ones). The problem is that the original bolded entry has it's own UPC code and then inside of that box is another UPCed package that is also sold by itself. So really, there doesn't seem to be any other way to profile this except by doing it like a box set, but since they don't technically meet the "more than one film" then... what? Maybe this is this one of those crazy exceptions where we should just be looking the other way.. | | | "Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" - Douglas Bader "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Since it's not a TV series and not a box set according to the rules, I think the cast and crew should be allowed. (I have it set up as a box set locally though) | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
|
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | So the first one is a box set, but the second two aren't?
The rules state: The term "Box Set" is used to define any release that includes more than one film. The main examples are:
* Sets where each film is packaged individually, and held together in a package of some kind. * Sets where each film is on a separate disc, but not individually packaged. This includes gatefold Digipaks and 2-Disc sets in normal DVD cases. * Sets containing 2 films, one on each side of Dual-Sided DVD.
What constitutes a film? I would argue that since the Gollum feature and the Howard Shore feature are both packaged separately, they count as "films" that are "packaged individually, and held together in a package of some kind."
/Ain't I a stinker? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Leiterfluid: Quote: So the first one is a box set, but the second two aren't?
The rules state: The term "Box Set" is used to define any release that includes more than one film. The main examples are:
* Sets where each film is packaged individually, and held together in a package of some kind. * Sets where each film is on a separate disc, but not individually packaged. This includes gatefold Digipaks and 2-Disc sets in normal DVD cases. * Sets containing 2 films, one on each side of Dual-Sided DVD.
What constitutes a film? I would argue that since the Gollum feature and the Howard Shore feature are both packaged separately, they count as "films" that are "packaged individually, and held together in a package of some kind."
/Ain't I a stinker? You are correvt. A "film" can be a 20 minute documentary. Since all three sets contain the movie and a bonus festure disc in their own packaging, they constute as a Box Set per the Box set rules. We had this discusison more times than I care to count over at the old site. Nothing has changed since then when it was determined that they were "box sets". Also, just as the Inidiana Jones set, since the "bonus" content is in its own packaging (case) it qualifies as getting a profile. | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pplchamp: Quote: We had this discusison more times than I care to count over at the old site. Nothing has changed since then when it was determined that they were "box sets". Actually, I seem to remember a different outcome to the debate. I believe they were considered not to be box sets, but that the extra DVD (NG, Dollum, Symphony) that came with was a bonus disc and that the gift set profile should contain the data for the film. Because the Bonus Disc was in its own package and could get its own profile, and because the film itself was released individually in a case with its own UPC, it had its own profile, and so people who wanted to make a box set out of it could. But don't confuse that with the outcome of the debate, which was that it was just a custom packaged gift set and not a box set. I don't really care which way it is in the database since I have mine set up as a box set, but that's the way I remember the discussion going. |
|
Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 240 |
| Posted: | | | | If it's only one movie it's not a box set no matter how much extra crap is included or how it's packaged. | | | Tom. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pplchamp: Quote:
You are correvt.
A "film" can be a 20 minute documentary.
Yes it can, I have no argument there What is strange though, is that the two disc set for From Dusk Till Dawn aren't considered as a Box Set since the second disc is just one documentary, Full Tilt Boogie (which also got theatrical release. 108 minutes long). Back on the old site it was decided against that this two disc set was a box set Quote:
Since all three sets contain the movie and a bonus festure disc in their own packaging, they constute as a Box Set per the Box set rules.
Unfortunatelly, the rules doesn't mention the packaging at all in regards to it being a box set or not. I agree with you, on it being a box set, but the rules doesn't support it Quote:
We had this discusison more times than I care to count over at the old site. Nothing has changed since then when it was determined that they were "box sets".
I never saw a decision on that. I remember the discussions but thought the decision went to other way. I might remember wrong though Quote:
Also, just as the Inidiana Jones set, since the "bonus" content is in its own packaging (case) it qualifies as getting a profile. That is irrelevant in this discussion. It gets it's a profile because of this little thing from the rules: If there is a disc of Bonus Material for all films included in the Box-set, create a separate profile for this disc.As you see, it has nothing to do with the packaging As I said, personally I have it set up as a box set locally, but I don't see anything in the rules that support it being a box set based on the packaging. The best thing, in my opinion, would be to allow the data there for those that want it and remove it locally if you don't want it | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | Well, I'm committed to treating them as a box set, because all three of them contain unique titles that are packaged individually. The fact of the matter is, when each of us bought those titles, we didn't just buy the movie. We bought the extra features, and the cool statues.
I personally think that gift set packaging that has a different UPC than the primary title should be treated as a box set, even if the gift set only contains one DVD title (such as Aladdin, Cinderella, and The Lion King sets), and that the profile information is relevant to the inner packaging that actually contains the discs.
Which is why that Blade Runner gift set cheesed me off so much. How dare they use the same UPC for the outer and inner packaging! But that's the only case (in my collection) that I think it's appropriate for Gift Set Packaging to not be treated as a Box Set.
Maybe the rules need to modified to accommodate Gift Sets, given the number of them that are out there. |
|
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: Quoting pplchamp:
Quote:
You are correvt.
A "film" can be a 20 minute documentary.
Yes it can, I have no argument there What is strange though, is that the two disc set for From Dusk Till Dawn aren't considered as a Box Set since the second disc is just one documentary, Full Tilt Boogie (which also got theatrical release. 108 minutes long). Back on the old site it was decided against that this two disc set was a box set
Hey, I can certainly agree with that. From Dusk Till Dawn should be treated as a box set in that case. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 940 |
| Posted: | | | | All 3 of the LOTR gift sets were originally set up as boxed sets. Here are the links to the contribution notes for each: Fellowship of the RingTwo TowersReturn of the KingWhether or not the rules explicitly prohibit them from being considered boxed sets, that is the way they have been for over 3 years. | | | Kevin |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | if it has a wet nose, waggy tail and woofs then its a dog.
Looks like a boxset to me. | | | Paul |
|