Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | this question is two-fold (maybe even tri-fold)
1) for those double feature titles, that are one movie on each side of a disc, should they get their own profile (by disc id) even if that disc id is the same as the disc for the single release of the movie? and if so, what would the overview be, the one on the cover for the double feature, or the one on the cover for the single movie release?
2) what about the double feature titles, where it is two movies on one side of a disc. do those not get child profiles for each movie (i realize that locally i could use the single movie release as a child profile if i desire)
3) and then box sets that are two discs (1 for each movie) but in the same keep case (2-disc keep case). and the disc id's are not for the single release version of these movies, what should get put in as the overview? should it be the same overview that is on the box and used for the box set profile, or should the overview from the single release be used?
-Agrare |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 775 |
| Posted: | | | | 1) For this yes, you would create one child profile for each side, with the UPC belonging to the parent. If the disc ID clashes with another, earlier release of the same disc ID, then you can still link it to the parent as a child, just not work on the profile itself to customise it as a child to your set. Well, not for the online DB, at any rate.
2) Not much that can be done about this. Best best is to stick all the details in the profile (combine running times, add features from both films, use the production year of the earliest film etc.) and divide the credits using headers.
3) Much the same as #1, really, one child per disc instead of per side. The overview should be the entire relevant part of the back cover for the parent, if there is a separate description for each movie then only put the relevant section in the child. If the overview is only a brief outline of both films, it might be more useful to invoke the original overview rule, which could involve borrowing from a single release, yes. Although as with #1, if the disc ID clashes with an earlier release, the child can only be linked, not edited for the online DB. | | | Last edited: by Nadja |
|
Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | I think that mostly answers my question, but want to go into a bit more detail for the first one.
1) perhapes the title might help. This is the double feature of Demolition Man and Over the Top 012569-815155
the release for demolition man (085391-298526) has the same disc id as the side of the double feature release that contains demolition man.
the release for over the top (012569-695344) has the same disc id as the side of the double feature release that contains over the top.
so the question is, should the child profile for the double feature be the profiles defined by upc's for the movie, or should another profile be created that uses the disc id for these titles. if the later is done, any differences (don't know if there are any) can be made to the profile and possibly contributed since the UPC profile wouldn't be affected. however, would the Disc ID profiles then use the picture for the single release or for the double feature box?
-Agrare |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 775 |
| Posted: | | | | Yes, you'd definitely create a child for each movie via disc ID. You can certainly use the standalone release as a template for your child profile, and then check the details against your disc. The image would be from your Action Double Feature release, which would also be the source of the DVD release date and the case type. |
|
Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | Ok, that pretty much clears up any confusion I had I think...now i just need to go through and audit a few profiles and make some submissions.
-Agrare |
|