This got declined with 2 yes voted and zero no votes.

Reason given was "Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions."


I will bold the sources.

Here are the contribution notes.

Source is DVD itself and each episodes end credits.

Studios to match end credits.

Overview from back cover.

Added crew with episode dividers and as credited in each episode. Used credited as for Garry Marshall, this is Penny's brother and is the producer of the show along with many other TV Series. This also links him to the previous 2 seasons of Laverne & Shirley.

#16 divider is split into 2 to include the full name of the episode because it won't all fit in one.

Cast added with episode dividers. Penny and Cindy roles carried over from 2 previous seasons of L&S already in database.

Other roles taken from end credits.

Credited as:
Used http://www.tv.com/laverne-and-shirley/show/760/episode_guide.html?season=3&tag=season_dropdown;dropdown;2


Michael McManus credited as Michael L. McManus - http://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/michael-mcmanus/166187

Cisse Cameron credited as Cissy Colpitts - not much info about her, but found this on a blog. http://booksteveslibrary.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html
Listed under "Monday, September 17, 2007"

Linda Gillen credited as Linda Gillin - http://video.barnesandnoble.com/search/product.asp?ean=97360694529&z=y&bnit=H

Frances E. Williams credited as Frances Williams - The TV.com link above and Credit Lookup tool results E. = 26 profiles, no E. = 4 profiles.

Bob McClurg uncredited is from the DVD case episode list inside and under disc #4.

As you can see I noted sources. The DVD, end credits, previous L&S seasons already in database, other websites, credit lookup tool and the dvd case for the uncredited person.

Any help?

I already PM'ed Geri. But is probably asleep right now.

Gerri, in your PM you said I should resubmit it. Which I did and I moved the info about the roles and uncredited to the top.

But now you said that you went ahead and approved it.

Should I withdraw my contribution since you said you approved it or should I let it go through?

Just a little confused as to what you want me to do.

Quoting Gerri Cole:

Quote:
Quoting Rander:

Quote:
The profile got accepted - the scans were declined (with no reason)...

If you are referring to Coneheads, it was because the people (or aliens in this case, I guess) on the front appeared pink on my screen. I didn't think the improvements to the back image provided enough improvement to make this image a significant improvement over what was there.

I was referring to that - and you're right, I can see that now...

That'll teach me not to edit scans with the sun glaring directly into my screen... 

Oh, and you can tell Ken that I'm a little disappointed that I can't give you a positive point for that! If he can program it so we can't rate yours or Kens posts, he can also do it so that we can only give you positives and no negatives! 

You only check twice per day? 

It would be more interesting to know what the person who voted Yes was thinking? That is something that amazes me even more!

Right now, I have The Wedding Crashers up for vote. The only changes are that that a DTS soundtrack has been added and then some new covers. The notes say the DTS track was added "from cover"...

Now, it doesn't say "DTS" anywhere on the cover (existing or contributed), so where did he get that from? The contributed scans are a bit blurred according to the existing ones, and to top it off, the back has a big SF-logo (the distributor) embossed in it - something the original cover does not have, and it gives the impression that it was taken from someones website.

Obviously, I voted No the minute I saw it (after checking the actual disc to see it it did indeed have a DTS track - it doesn't), which was two days ago. Today, I am baffled to see that two other people have actually voted Yes! I recognize the names, and I don't remember ever seeing them voting no for anything! Come to think of it, I don't remember seeing any contributions or forum posts from them either, but that's besides the point here...

What I would like to know is: Why do these people even vote? If they vote Yes for anything - even the (I know this may sound harsh) obviously bogus contirbutions, what is the point? Does Ken and Gerri keep some kind of list to see if people are voting "properly?" Can they revoke someones voting rights if they don't? Will they?

Quoting Rander:

Quote:
What I would like to know is: Why do these people even vote? If they vote Yes for anything - even the (I know this may sound harsh) obviously bogus contirbutions, what is the point?

I'd guess it's one of two things:

They just want to get rid of the list of titles up or voting and do not realise they can do that by using the neutral voting button; or

They just want to get rid of the titles and realise that a neutral vote doesn't count towards the number of votes on their profile page.

I can (sort of) live with the first one, but the second is problematic.  Of course, the real reason may be something totally different!