Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Hello,
I intend to reach 1000 approved contributions in September.
And another 1000 each month until December. Being very ambitious, would that be a competitive result?
Which score does a busy contributor reach during one month (if the month is not March 2007)?
And is it possible to expand the my-contributions page? It restrains my productivity, that a maximum of only 500 recent contributions are displayed...
Thank you. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: April 4, 2007 | Posts: 879 |
| Posted: | | | | how about first reading the rules and creating GOOD updated first? your recent "updates" haven't exactly been of high quality, to put it nicely | | | - Jan |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 426 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree, this isn't a competition, and it's pretty easy to artificially increase your submission count. E.g. instead of doing one huge contribution, just submit field by field. Your count will increase but I bet you won't get a lot of sympathy from either the voters nor the screeners. |
|
| Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | First see if you can 'up your posts' from 11 to 1000 ... in one month .. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Wasser:
Youy are going to reach 1000 declined Contributions long before you 1000 approved and the more declined you have the harder to get any approved. read the Rules first and then follow them.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 291 |
| Posted: | | | | i'm really baffled by this goal. i wasn't aware we were competing on the number of contributions. this really smacks of just wanting one's name attached to a contribution rather than thinking of the good of the database and the information in it. highly krik | | | "Vampirism is still not a disease, Julia. Vampires are the living dead...dead...dead..." |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 36 |
| Posted: | | | | The strange thing is: All your contribution notes say "All information from DVD". And we all know, that you stated in another Threat in this forum, that you do not take your data directly from DVD. The only reason, you use this phrase, is because you think, that the contribution is getting approved more easily. Quoting Wasserglas: Quote:
Schreibe immer dazu 'Source: DVD', egal woher die Daten stammen.
Schließlich kontrolliert invelos ja nicht, ob die Daten korrekt sind. Die Annahme ist gewährleistet, wenn dieser Zusatz enthalten ist, und skipnet nicht dagegen gestimmt hat. English Translation: Quoting Wasserglas: Quote:
Always write "Source DVD" no matter from where your data is.
Invelos does not control, if the data is correct or not. They believe, the data is correct, if you use this addition ("Source DVD") and Skipnet does not vote against it" By the way: It's easy to reach this 1000 mark, if you only change "Case Type" and some "Features". I haven't seen any Full Audit from you... | | | Ääärrrrrmin!! | | | Last edited: by Mozo |
|
| Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | I never contribute any information without first doing a full audit to ensure all entered information is correct... I only wish that more people would do the same, but evidently some see this as a competition, rather than serving the common good... Oh, well, more work for me | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | I wonder if the clue is in his tagline. "simply a silly baby" | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 465 |
| Posted: | | | | Wasserglas is simply another attention whore in the Profiler world, as was clearly indicated to the German community by a nonsensical contribution for a "Lord of the Rings" profile after his first try was declined. He attacked me personally in the contribution notes because I had pointed other users to the mistakes in the first upload. His tag line is in fact a quote from my comment to this said second contribution, where I told him to stop behaving like a silly baby.
No idea what he's trying to achieve now, and frankly, I'm not interested. He should be aware that the community will keep an eye on his contributions, though. I guess he'll be bored with his games very soon and search for another hobby to get attention. | | | Michael |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Strive for quality not quanity... You'll get respect from the community if you do.
Lying in your contribution notes will only eventually get you banned. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 78 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lexxx: Quote: I haven't seen any Full Audit from you... ..and I don't want to see one he did ! Imagine what will happen to cast&crew... Let him play with the cover |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Some people are so stupid (I refer to this topic starter). I hope that Ken and Geri will get their eyes open on his contribution, since he doesn't seem to care about quality. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | We have, unfortunately, quite a few of those, AESP.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | You're actually going to personally review each and every one of those 1,000 contributions? |
|