| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | | Posts: 48 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would love to see a data field that dedicated to the releasing company. I would like to know how many Blue Underground dvds I have, or Anchor Bay or Synapse Films and so on. Especially with the independant studios I tend to shop by brand name. Since it is still DVD profiler, (even though it is becoming more and more "movie" profiler) it would be a great addition to the software. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,623 |
| |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yeah, I quite like that too. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,436 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes, please. I soooo agree.
(At some point I had suggested to make this the top entry in the Studio list, but was shot down...) | | | Achim [諾亞信； Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan.
Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Definitely needed when the three Studio fields are already full. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,022 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree My only fear with all these additions to the program, is that this would need an amendment to every single title in the d/b to bring them all up to speed. The CoO's are still not completed  | | |  |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Good point - though is it possible for Ken to write some sort of filter to automatically move the most common ones, Warner Home Video for example? Warner Home Video aren't a production or theatrical distribution company, so it's safe to move it into the new field.
Being able to move the companies between the studio field and new field using those up and down arrows would help a lot too. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think, Ken learned something with 3.x and the additional TWO Studio plus a new distributor field will wait to be incorporated in the program with several other changes...so we don't have a COO repeat performance.  I hope so anyway.  Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Good to hear! Now, any news on a release date for the new version...?  |
|
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | | Posts: 48 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
I think, Ken learned something with 3.x and the additional TWO Studio plus a new distributor field will wait to be incorporated in the program with several other changes...so we don't have a COO repeat performance. I hope so anyway.
Skip Let's hope so. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 223 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Good to hear! Now, any news on a release date for the new version...? As Skip would say "Do a search...." I'm sure you'll find the answer is Monday   |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote:
The CoO's are still not completed I have no problem with slow population of new fields. Therefore the CoO updates are not distubing me in any way. I still have some profiles where the only crew is the director. So, I'd like to see a DVD studio field soon. Maybe a system similar to the audio field where every studio would get a describing parameter would be a solution: studio 1: production studio studio 2: production studio . . . studio N: theatrical distributor . . . studio M: DVD studio |
|