Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | and we off..!.. to another New Year... glad to see some fire in here.... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Forum Moderator: Removed | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Skip - leave me alone - your comment to me that you would have decked me or someone else is the last straw.
I have sent the following Support ticket to invelos:
Invelos has written rules that the community is expected to follow in regards to forum postings.
When a community member violates invelos policy, there are consequences for those violations.
Bannable offenses include: - Transmitting illegal, patently obscene, hateful, or racially derogatory content - Repeated harassment of another member
Here is a link that highlights some of the threads that proves Skip has posted hateful comments and repeatedly harassed community members: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=649083&PageNum=7&messageID=2009275#M2009275.
No one has the right to make threats to another community member - it is unacceptable and I want it stopped: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=649083&PageNum=7&messageID=2009283#M2009283.
I am requesting that invelos enforce the rules and ban Winston Smith for his continuous and unrepentant violations of invelos stated policy. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | And you aren't harrassing me and have for some time. That goes both ways, I hsve tried very hard to be nice but you wont permit. I think its high time you were banned for your behavior which has been against forum rules for years. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote: And you aren't harrassing me and have for some time. That goes both ways, I hsve tried very hard to be nice but you wont permit. I think its high time you were banned for your behavior which has been against forum rules for years. Prove it. Post the links that back your statements. Quote any posts that I've made that violate invelos forum guidelines. I've went through and read all 45 pages of your posts and only posted only a few of the one's that back up my statements. Your harassment and hateful comments aren't just against me - it is against almost every member of the community including Ken. I've read these forums for many years and have seen how "nice" you are to others. Once again I suggest you go through and read the 45 pages of posts you made. The only time you are nice is when someone agrees with you. The rest of the time you post increasingly hostile comments which often leads to the forum moderator removing the most offending ones. I hope that Ken goes through and reads both of our posts and gives warnings or bans as appropriate. | | | Last edited: by Kathy |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Thank you ken. I am done here. You have successfully proven that Kathy is allowed ti.say whatever shebwishe, make whatever slanderous remarks she wishes, call me whatever name she chooses, including one that us so offensive....I can't even go there. Something I would never say about any user, yet she has done so repeatedly. She dies all this with full knowledge that inveliswill take absolutely no action against her. In fact, quite the contrary she is rewarded forvthe mist disgusting behavior and name calling I have ever seen. I have challenged you yo discuss this with me numerous times and been ignored. Thank you for the answer. Skip out. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Kathy doesn't get her posts removed, Skip; so that says it all as far as I am concerned. You have been repeatedly nasty for years, which is why I now refuse to talk to you at all. I hope you do get banned.
On the topic: From the rules: "details from the HD media in the main profile."
Ok, so where in the rules does it say that extras from the DVD or other discs, should be entered into the parent profile? Are we just saying that's what we should do because child profiles are optional?
Personally, I would prefer that each profile reflect ONLY what is on the specific disc.
I'll happily go along with what's been discussed here; but, quite frankly, this part of the rules is terribly written/conceived in my opinion. |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: I'll happily go along with what's been discussed here; but, quite frankly, this part of the rules is terribly written/conceived in my opinion. This part? |
|
Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,650 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote: I am done here. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: The rules also say to enter anamorphic DVDs as anamorphic. The question is which rules override what. You follow the rule that covers the item in question...in this case the rule for combo sets. Quote: However, that was snark than a serious argument. It was not snark. You claim that, because you can check the box, it should be checked. I was simply pointing out that we have other areas that we can fill in, but don't because of the rules. Quote: I'll grant you this point. What about disc IDs, though. Does anyone hold that this rule means you shouldn't enter the disc ID of any DVDs in a combo pack on the main profile? How is this handled with normal multi disc sets? Do we enter the disc ID for the second disc? If yes, then we do the same here. If not, then we don't. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: On the topic: From the rules: "details from the HD media in the main profile."
Ok, so where in the rules does it say that extras from the DVD or other discs, should be entered into the parent profile? Are we just saying that's what we should do because child profiles are optional? No, I am saying we should do it because the rule also says they "are to be entered as a normal profile." Unless I am mistaken, when we have a 2-disc set...one with a main feature on one disc and bonus features on the other...we enter those bonus features in the profile. Why would we do it differently here? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: August 4, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,441 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JeroenX: Quote:
I think that the following is unclear: I agree, that with a combo pack the 'anamorphic' shouldn't be ticked, since the main media (if Blu-ray) can't be anamorphic.
But the program forces us to check PAL/NTSC, which doesn't belong to the main media (if Blu-ray).
So we have to contribute data (PAL/NTSC) which, according to the rule, may not be entered. No one has the answer to this question... If I've to ignore the 'anamorphic' option in combo, what should I do with the PAL/NTSC option, that I'm forced to use? Should I thick the option with regard to DVD or what? And in this case, why the option PAL/NTSC is mandatory and the anamorphic option is forbidden? | | | Updated List of Accepted Birth Years |
|
Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote: I am done here. Promises, promises, but as usual you ain't gonna stand behind them. |
|
Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote: Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote: I am done here. Promises, promises, but as usual you ain't gonna stand behind them. Of course he won't. He already started a thread this morning that was quickly locked. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | I wasn't sure what was the "correct" answer, then I thought I understood, but now I'm back to thinking this issue is not clear cut.
Since there seems to be ongoing discussion and debate about whether to tick or not, might it be better to find something better than what we have? | | | Last edited: by Kathy |
|