Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 5 6 7 8 9 ...11  Previous   Next
Chinese names
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKulju
Registered: March 14, 2007
Finland Posts: 2,337
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:

On the surface, that sounds good, but in practice it won't work.  If the rules are clarified so that first/middle/last simply refers to the order on screen, reading left to right, you can't have 'Helena/ /Bonham Carter'. Under that type of rule, which we attempted to write, it would be parsed 'Helena/Bonham/Carter' as that is the order, on screen, reading from left to right.

I totally agree, easiest way is not the best way in many cases.
Quote:

The first thing that must be decided is, are we entering 'names' or are we entering 'data'?  If we are entering names, then they should be entered as names...with a default standard.

Again I agree. In my opinion data we are entering in this case, is names.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorschizzzo
Registered: March 20, 2007
Germany Posts: 78
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Not at all Fly. A totally specious claim. It is specious because tyhe search function is a local function and not an Online (Credit lookup Tool aside). Therefore YOU are in complete control of YOUR data. If simply MUST be able to search based on cultural preferences then all you have ot do is treat your data LOCALLTY accordingly.

Skip


And we should only contribute to the online database profiles from movies with american names in american credits with american role descriptors? What are cultural preferences? Translating the british "Dubbing mixer" to an american "Re-recording sound mixer"? That's not as credited but the only way to get the data from a british movie into the american DVDP. Should we keep all data which don't fit into the profiles because of the rules designed for american credits local? We get most of our data from the online database and if we want to contribute profiles from international movies with international (better multinational) credits it must be considered in the rules and in the database design. At the moment it isn't.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorschizzzo
Registered: March 20, 2007
Germany Posts: 78
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:
The first thing that must be decided is, are we entering 'names' or are we entering 'data'?  If we are entering names, then they should be entered as names...with a default standard.


We are entering names, the data is generated out of these names. And it is important to entering names, only than correct data can be generated (for sorting or linking or recognizing).
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKulju
Registered: March 14, 2007
Finland Posts: 2,337
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
It is specious because tyhe search function is a local function and not an Online (Credit lookup Tool aside).


That is the thing today, but we don't know what kind of improvements there will be online, in hopefully near future. The point is that if we follow your interpretation (don't claim otherwise, that's all it is, your interpretation) how names supposed to be entered, we collect, if not wrong, at least VERY illogical data.
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantsmeehrrr
Registered: March 26, 2007
Posts: 196
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Not at all Fly. A totally specious claim. It is specious because tyhe search function is a local function and not an Online (Credit lookup Tool aside). Therefore YOU are in complete control of YOUR data. If simply MUST be able to search based on cultural preferences then all you have ot do is treat your data LOCALLTY accordingly.

The rules are there for a reason, and that reason should be to increase the overall fidelity of the data in the online database.  The current rule on how the naming fields should be used is vague and needs clarification - as written, it does not cover this case sufficiently to allow high fidelity data to be entered.  This has nothing to do with what you can put into your local database, and there's no sense derailing yet another thread with this irrelevant direction.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Smee:

Fidelity to the Onlibne does not equate with fidelity to your database. The Online will NEVER be able to be all things too all users, that is one of the reasons we have a the two-tier system. You, as a user a perfectly free to structure data in whatever manner suits your personal preferences which in all likelihood will be quite different from my own, who in turn will be very different from schizzo.

@schizzo

You throw out smoke and mirrors to misdirect and misguide. Just recently I constructed a cast and crew listing for a French film. It was very EASY to do, translation issues for some crew aside. I don't have to try and translate the Roles, sort out naming or anything else. I typpe what I see On Screen, the data APPEARS as it does On Screen VERY SIMPLE, nor do I feel the need scream bloody murder that this FRENCH film is put together in a manner that is American friendly, that is not what we are trying to achieve.

I don't care about Asian naming customs, even though i understand them quite well, that is not the function. Now if you want to complain about the program's inavbility to cope with Kanji, Chineses, Sanskrit, Cyrillic, Greek or numerous ather possible issues...yes that is an issue, and one which I have absolutely no control over and since i don't have a copy of Delphi I have absolutely no idea just how big a problem it might represent for Ken, but that is his ball. The Rule was developed as it was for a specific reasonand it is that simple. Our program is not intended to be encyclopedic relative to film data, such databases are already out there and because of their encyclopedic nature contain major issues relative to accuracy as measured against the film credits. We are true to the film's credits, restructuring of names due to cultural or any other parameters leads to inaccuracies relative to those credits. Were the program able to cope with Cyrillic, from  a Russian film, if you wanted to translate that data fore the online I would tell you absolutely NOT, copy it as you as SEE it. Any translation would become a personal matter suitable for your local database ONLY.  You are free to do anything you wish locally, and while i understand your concerns, I will also tellyou that your concerns stem from a lack of comprehension about (1)the two-tier structure of the database and (2) lack of understanding what the Online is trying to do. It is never ever going to be a pre-canned database that is immediately suitable to your usage, it is not One Size Fits All or even Most. Though I do remember once seeing a sweatshirt that said One Size Fits MOST.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantsmeehrrr
Registered: March 26, 2007
Posts: 196
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Fidelity to the Onlibne does not equate with fidelity to your database. The Online will NEVER be able to be all things too all users, that is one of the reasons we have a the two-tier system. You, as a user a perfectly free to structure data in whatever manner suits your personal preferences which in all likelihood will be quite different from my own, who in turn will be very different from schizzo.

This is just a cop-out, though, a way to quash the conversation.  This is no different from the "just use notes/tags" cop-out that comes up in the feature request forum every time someone asks for something slightly different.

The rules are imperfect, and there is nothing wrong with highlighting this and requesting clarification, or, since that seems to come rarely, at least attempting to build consensus among the regular contributors.  There's no reason to resort to "just do it locally", or "the rules can't be everything to everyone".  While the latter is true, what the rules can be is consistent, well thought-out, and thorough, and there's no reason why we shouldn't discuss improvements here.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
EDit for whoopsie
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The Rules are consistent, smee. They simply don't apply YOUR version of consistent.

Therein lies the rub, and you aren't interested in trying to understand what and why. There is a method to what you view as insanity...ALWAYS. Just not you particular brand of insanity. It's a joke, son. Even your reference to them being imperfect is built around your bias.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantsmeehrrr
Registered: March 26, 2007
Posts: 196
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
The Rules are consistent, smee. They simply don't apply YOUR version of consistent.

They are not, however, "consistent, well thought-out, and thorough".  If they were, this forum would be much, much quieter.

In this case, the rule is consistent only because it is so vague.  It is not being consistently applied, however.  See my previous example about Helena Bonham Carter.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Smee:

The HB discussion I don't consider to be a valid because however it is handled it does NOT change the appearance of the data. The hooo-ha over Asianb names is about changing the APPEARANCE of the name relative to the On Screen appearance. That is the one thing , and whatever is done has to be done either the Alias or locally.  You set H/B/C, H//BC or even HB//C they all apear the same in the Cast list relative to the On Screen data.

Chow Yun Fat, change it and you depart from the On Screen Appearance. So, you are in effect attempting to comapare an apple and an orange, or showing me that you really don't understand, which is also why I take exception to your repeated references  well-thought out and thorough. Quite the contrary is true, it just was not done by your style, but it was done and very well-thought out for a specific REASON. You can't even begin to approach until I see seom indication that you comprehend the whys and the wherefores. If you want to handle this problem through the Alias system FINE, if you want to handle it locally FINE. If you want to handle it just to be culturally correct, then you will fundamentally break the system as it is designed.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
That is all well and good but, until the rules spell it out, this issue is going to keep coming up.  As I said before, I don't care how it is addressed, it just needs to be addressed.

On a side note, since we don't enter credits in all caps or all lower case, we already depart from the "On Screen Appearance."  So, for me at least, that is a non-issue.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
 Last edited: by TheMadMartian
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRHo
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 2,759
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Quoting Kulju:
Quote:
The question is:
Does the First Name / Last Name in the program mean
#1.Given Name/Family Name
or
#2.Left Name on the screen/Right Name on the screen?

That is the question rules doesn't give as an answer. If we had only one field, "name", answer would be simple by the rules.


I certainly think it would solve a lot of problems if we simply had a confirmation in the rules that #2 was the way to go.

I certainly think it would solve a lot of problems if we simply had a confirmation in the rules that #1 was the way to go. It has less problems concerning linking. And for as credited, we can use the "credited as" feature.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTheFly
Registered: March 18, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 103
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
The hooo-ha over Asianb names is about changing the APPEARANCE of the name relative to the On Screen appearance. That is the one thing , and whatever is done has to be done either the Alias or locally.

So Skip, how would you handle the example I posted earlier in this thread, where someone is credited both in family/given order AND in given/family order? How is it possible to stick strictly to "on screen appearance" in such a case?
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:
On the surface, that sounds good, but in practice it won't work.  If the rules are clarified so that first/middle/last simply refers to the order on screen, reading left to right, you can't have 'Helena/ /Bonham Carter'.

Under that type of rule, which we attempted to write, it would be parsed 'Helena/Bonham/Carter' as that is the order, on screen, reading from left to right.

I think you may have missed a bit of my post. So I'll try and explain it without all the other stuff:

Bonham Carter is two words but only one name. It's therefore perfectly acceptable to specify that we enter the names reading left to right and still parse it as Helena//Bonham Carter.
I hope that makes what I meant clearer.

@RHo,
you are quite right, if the rules were changed to support option 1, that would be just as acceptable. However it would also make it harder to make Asian profiles as you would have to know how the name was parsed before entering. Option 2 only relies on people entering what they see on the screen and so makes it easier for more people to contribute. I'm also tending towards option 2 as I think that more closely reflects the current state of the database, so there would be less upheaval.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantWhite Pongo, Jr.
No, I iz no Cheshire Cat!
Registered: August 22, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 1,807
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Graveworm:
Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:
Quote:
Last Name is a synonym  of Family Name.

Not if you translate it into Chinese, I have no problem with Fiest Name last name just don't insult the majority by appying the minority interpretation.


In the English language, Last Name and Family Name are synonyms even when talking about Chinese last names.

Here is an example from a randomly picked web site:

http://www.chinapage.com/biography/lastname.html
Quote:

Chinese Last Names

The logo shown above is the Chinese word for 'last name.'
Last name is shared within all members in the family

All members in a Chinese family have the same last name (surname, family name). Children all bear the same last name as their parents. When a bride marries into the family, she assumes the last name of her husband. When a daughter marries, she leaves the family and assumes the last name of her husband.
-- Enry
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 5 6 7 8 9 ...11  Previous   Next