Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pdf256: Quote:
John,
You claim to have experience, but you fight cast and/or crew linking. Without linking, what is the data for? I would think that someone with "experience" would understand that a pile of data without any good way to cross-reference it is a waste of time and disk space.
pdf Or for a (non Profiler) real world example. I work for a life insurance company. We maintain a database of customers policies, if we didn't match customers up when they applied for new policies, we would have no idea what risk that individual represents to us. And yes people do use variations of their names when completing their applications. Of course we can ask for birth/marriage/civil partnership certificates to prove who they are, but that's a whole side issue. | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 | | | Last edited: by Lithurge |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Episode Actor role Actor role Episode Actor role Actor role Episode Actor role Disc 1 Side A (or Disc 1 Side A) Episode Actor role Actor role Disc 1 Side B (or Disc1 Side B) Episode Actor role Actor role Disc 2 Episode Actor role Very simplistic, but which one reveals the most information. One gives you minimalist information, the other one tells you not only who is in the Episode but where it is.The comments you make, James and Lopek are precisely why I say I see no indication that you GET IT. If you got it you wouldn't have to make those comments Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | Oh, I get it, I just think it is completely stupid, and so I am ridiculing your foolish idea! Do you get it? Your "idea" is not supported by the rules, and adds nothing of value as it duplicates info that is already in the disc info section. Do you get it? | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Episode Actor role Actor role Episode Actor role Actor role Episode Actor role
Disc 1 Side A (or Disc 1 Side A) Episode Actor role Actor role Disc 1 Side B (or Disc1 Side B) Episode Actor role Actor role Disc 2 Episode Actor role
Very simplistic, but which one reveals the most information.
One gives you minimalist information, the other one tells you not only who is in the Episode but where it is.
The comments you make, James and Lopek are precisely why I say I see no indication that you GET IT. If you got it you wouldn't have to make those comments
Skip The Discs lists shows which episodes are on which discs already. But OK, so if we're going for the most information, why not: Disc 1 Side A (or Disc 1 Side A) English 5.1Spanish StereoCommentaryEpisode Actor role Actor role Disc 1 Side B (or Disc1 Side B) English 5.1FrenchSpanish StereoEpisode Actor role Actor role Disc 2 Episode Actor role | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Audio data does not go with cast and crew data. Stay on point and don't bring up idiotic distractions
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 519 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Stuart | | | Last edited: by Gadgeteer |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Audio data does not go with cast and crew data. Stay on point and don't bring up idiotic distractions
Skip Neither does disc info... that's the point Skip. Do you get it? | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database | | | Last edited: by Lopek |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Once again distraction to aviod the issue. Why do we include all that irrelevant crap in Edition.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | It's NOT Disc Info, it is ONLY a definition to provide informatiuon as to where in the set the data resides. Jesus Christ! Beyond belief. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Once again distraction to aviod the issue. Why do we include all that irrelevant crap in Edition.
Skip Yes, your right, bringing up the description is a distraction to avoid the issue. To answer though - because Ken wants it there - it is in the rules, and they are hard coded into the software. Do you get it? | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database | | | Last edited: by Lopek |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | edit | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Gerri Cole |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Audio data does not go with cast and crew data. Stay on point and don't bring up idiotic distractions
Skip Why does disc data, which we already record elsewhere, get duplicated in the cast and crew data then? Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Once again distraction to aviod the issue. Why do we include all that irrelevant crap in Edition.
Skip As if the Edition field argument is not a "distraction"? Quoting skipnet50: Quote: It's NOT Disc Info, it is ONLY a definition to provide informatiuon as to where in the set the data resides. Jesus Christ!
Beyond belief.
Skip "A definition to provide information as to where in the set the data resides" is what we call "disc info". We record that in the list of discs. | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Widescreen Collection is not hard coded into the software, lopek. It is redundant data, a marketing gimmick employed by Paramount, and we have that data elsewhere in the program. So why do we employ it. Why do we include Widescreen when there is ONLY a Widescreen release. there is nothing to differentiate. Good God, man. You argumentsare so bogus.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 519 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Widescreen Collection is not hard coded into the software, lopek. It is redundant data, a marketing gimmick employed by Paramount, and we have that data elsewhere in the program. So why do we employ it. Why do we include Widescreen when there is ONLY a Widescreen release. there is nothing to differentiate. Good God, man. You argumentsare so bogus.
Skip It's all to do with consistency. We always enter the edition from the cover and don't make exceptions because the same data may occasionally appear elsewhere in the database. | | | Stuart | | | Last edited: by Gadgeteer |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | As I said I, you clownns simply don't get it, you never will, I don't know if it's by choice or genetics but..whatever the reason you don't and I am through with the lot of you.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|