|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 4 5 6 7 8 ...17 Previous Next
|
RFC: Filter for Jr. |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Except that pesky little thing that it's what the rules tell us to do. Let me quote the rules again: "List names exactly as they are in the credits." Who are you to decide on your own that this doesn't apply to "a single capitalized or lowercase letter within the name"? In other words: who are you to decide the extent of the word "exactly" in that particular rule?
Except there is that pesky exception in the rules..."Exception: If the credit information is entirely capitalized, use standard capitalization rules instead." As I just quoted, yes. The "standard capitalization rules" that turn "FRANCOIS" into "Francois" and "DEVITO" into "Devito", even when we happen to know that it really should be "François" and "DeVito". Quote: Standard capitalization rules dictate that you capitalize a persons name the way he or she wants it capitalized. In every instance, that I can find, it is capitalized as 'DeVito'. Who are you to decide, on your own, that this is incorrect? Again: we don't invent data that isn't on the screen. You're using outside sources to determine what you enter. That might work for this one name, because we all know it, but it doesn't work accross the board. And again, the "FRANCOIS" example is helpful: you say "on every instance, that I can find, it is capitalized as 'DeVito'". Well, I can say the exact same thing for "François" (with the accent), but even with that knowledge, Ken told us to enter "FRANCOIS" as "Francois". How is these two situations any different? Either we invent things that aren't on the screen, or we don't. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | And, as I have stated before, if you continue to put "Danny Devito" in the "Credited As" field, you run the risk of the CLT eventually showing more instance s of "Devito" than "DeVito" and you will then have to change ALL of the profiles to a new "Common Name".
Like I said, a complete waste of time! | | | Hal |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: And, as I have stated before, if you continue to put "Danny Devito" in the "Credited As" field, you run the risk of the CLT eventually showing more instance s of "Devito" than "DeVito" and you will then have to change ALL of the profiles to a new "Common Name". Here's the theoretical answer: Indeed! And quite rightly so, of course. If the guy is mostly credited as "Danny Devito" than that's his common name. That's what "use the most-credited form" means. I don't understand why you're so afraid of that: that exact principle is happening every single day. As you well know, we don't go by what you, me or the next guy feels that someone's "real" or "correct" name is - we use the most-credited. If that were to be "Devito", then so be it. But rest assured: it's not going to happen for this particular actor, though. But again: if our François, of which I can fully document that that is his correct and real name, is credited more often without the accent, then we ditch that "correct" and "real" name, and go with "Francois" as his common name instead. That's how the system works. There's no reason why things would be any different for Mr. DeVito. I'll supply a more practical answer, too, if you're interested: didn't you just see Ken eliminate this concern of yours with regards to suffixes? So it's not exactly impossible to solve, is it? Quoting hal9g: Quote: Like I said, a complete waste of time! There you go again: you don't see a problem, so apparently there IS no problem. But again: EnryWiki just showed you the problem: different users are handling this in different ways, and will vote against users doing it using one of the other methods - I know I do. To make sure we can all submit changes to profiles, it's important that we're all consistent on these very basic issues: we should handle them all alike, instead of encountering a different handling of such credits in every other profile. You may find that a "complete waste of time", while it seems of the utmost importance to me. And with that I'm not just referring to my method - even though it's the only one that follows the rules - but to the fact that we NEED to get everyone on the same page. Per EnryWiki's example (and countless arguments like this one), we're clearly not. Getting these three different methods of handling back to one universal method, doesn't seem like a "waste of time" to me. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: And, as I have stated before, if you continue to put "Danny Devito" in the "Credited As" field, you run the risk of the CLT eventually showing more instance s of "Devito" than "DeVito" and you will then have to change ALL of the profiles to a new "Common Name".
Like I said, a complete waste of time! Hal: So what, we are after MOST COMMONLY credited name as ken has stated numerous times. What you or someone else thinks is his "real" name is something for your local not the Online. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
As I just quoted, yes. The "standard capitalization rules" that turn "FRANCOIS" into "Francois" and "DEVITO" into "Devito", even when we happen to know that it really should be "François" and "DeVito". Um, there is no "standard capitalization rule" that turns FRANCOUS into Francous. That was a directive from Ken. To claim otherwise is to twist the facts. Quote:
Again: we don't invent data that isn't on the screen. You're using outside sources to determine what you enter. That might work for this one name, because we all know it, but it doesn't work accross the board. And again, the "FRANCOIS" example is helpful: you say "on every instance, that I can find, it is capitalized as 'DeVito'". Well, I can say the exact same thing for "François" (with the accent), but even with that knowledge, Ken told us to enter "FRANCOIS" as "Francois". How is these two situations any different? Either we invent things that aren't on the screen, or we don't. Again, you are twisting the facts to support your position. Converting 'FRANCOIS' into 'Francois' is a straight 1 to 1 conversion that has NOTHING to do with standard capitalization. Ken directed us to use this method because the letter 'Ç' exists. Converting 'C' into 'ç' is inventing data. Beyond that, you logic simply amazes me. If we don't 'invent data that isn't on screen', why do we enter 'DANNY DEVITO' as anything other than 'DANNY DEVITO'? Maybe because converting all caps into standard capitalization ISN'T inventing data? The rules tell us to enter names, that are in all caps, using standard capitalization rules. As I pointed out, the last time this came up, standard capitalization rules are as follows (from englishplus.com): A proper noun is a noun which names a specific person, place, or thing. That includes the following categories of names: Each part of a person's name: James A. Garfield Chester Alan Arthur Quote: Some parts of last names may not be capitalized.
Sometimes the part of the last name following Mac (but never Mc or M') may not be capitalized. For example, Prime Minister J. R. MacDonald, but author George Macdonald. There is no rule, just learn the name.
Sometimes the part of the last name following the particles de, du, d', den, der, des, la, le, l', ten, ter, van, or von (and similar particles) may or may not be capitalized. The particles themselves may or may not be capitalized. Check to see how the person prefers it. As I said then...and will repeat here...proper capitalization of names is to capitalize the first letter of each part and, for the rest...learn the name and see how the person prefers it. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | And again: wong on all counts... I'll leave you to it, but I'll repeat once more what I said earlier: that I would really like to hear from Ken on this. I'd like him to tell us which one, out of the three examples from the database that EnryWiki showed us, is the correct way to enter an on-screen DANNY DEVITO credit - keeping in mind that we don't need a solution for just a few well-known names, but something that works accross the board. And again: I'm happy to go either way. If Ken shares your "learn the name and see how the person prefers it" approach and we're suddenly having to check on outside sources before being able to transfer a simple credit from the screen into DVD Profiler - heaven help us - I'll be glad to do so. As long as he doesn't, I remain convinced that option #3 is currently the one and only way to go. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Hal:
So what, we are after MOST COMMONLY credited name as ken has stated numerous times. What you or someone else thinks is his "real" name is something for your local not the Online.
Skip You are correct...to a point. While we are after the most commonly credited form of the name we are also after, when the name is in all caps, the properly capitalized form of the name. Converting 'DANNY DEVITO' into 'Danny Devito' does not follow standard capitalization rules so violates the rules. If he were credited, more often than not, as 'Danny Devito' then I would not have a problem. The problem is that he isn't. For all credits of 'DANNY DEVITO', people like T!M, are creating an artificial name based on personal preference. As I said before, I am just happy Ken set the prgram up in such a way that this garbage doesn't make it into my local. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: And again: wong on all counts... Funny, I was just thinking the same thing about your posts. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Converting 'DANNY DEVITO' into 'Danny Devito' does not follow standard capitalization rules so violates the rules. No! Converting 'DANNY DEVITO' into 'Danny DeVito' does not follow standard capitalization rules so violates the rules. Quote: As I said before, I am just happy Ken set the prgram up in such a way that this garbage doesn't make it into my local. Ah, the perfect way to end every debate... That leaves me with a heartfelt: "Likewise!" It's just sad that encountering a different method of handling this in every other profile doesn't exactly makes contributing easier - and that goes for either side. We should really be able to get on the same page on these very basic issues. I understand that I'm an easy target because I happen to be the one who cares enough to keep replying, but you'll have noted, both in this thread and in the database, that I'm decidedly not the only one that feels this way. Which isn't surprisingly, since I'm only following the rules. Anyway: feel free to try and discredit me all you want - I couldn't care less. I'm only interested in accurate data. That's all. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: If he were credited, more often than not, as 'Danny Devito' then I would not have a problem. Let's play the devil's advocate, here: how would you know, exactly? After all, you've decided not to record the difference between these two credits in your database, so how would you even know whether he's more often credited as "Devito" or as "DeVito"? You don't. I, on the other hand, know EXACTLY what the balance between the two variants in my database is. So who's got the accurate data? This may be strictly theory for Mr. DeVito, but I'm sure there are plenty examples where this gets a lot more pressing: you concede that you're willing to change the common name when the balance shifts, yet you refuse to actually RECORD entries that may shift the balance. I can't believe you don't see the gaping hole in this approach! | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: No! Converting 'DANNY DEVITO' into 'Danny DeVito' does not follow standard capitalization rules so violates the rules. I have given you a reference to support my claim that it does...or did you choose to ignore that? Please be so kind as to provide your reference that says it doesn't. Quote:
Quote: As I said before, I am just happy Ken set the prgram up in such a way that this garbage doesn't make it into my local. Ah, the perfect way to end every debate... That leaves me with a heartfelt: "Likewise!" One small problem there...you are the one introducing the garbage into the database. Quote: It's just sad that encountering a different method of handling this in every other profile doesn't exactly makes contributing easier - and that goes for either side. We should really be able to get on the same page on these very basic issues. I understand that I'm an easy target because I happen to be the one who cares enough to keep replying, but you'll have noted, both in this thread and in the database, that I'm decidedly not the only one that feels this way. Which isn't surprisingly, since I'm only following the rules. Anyway: feel free to try and discredit me all you want - I couldn't care less. I'm only interested in accurate data. That's all. You are not following the rules, you are following your own personal preference. As I said, I have given you a reference to 'standard capitalization rules for names'. It isn't something I made up, it is something I found online. If you choose to ignore it, that is fine, but it speaks volumes as to your motives here. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: You are not following the rules, you are following your own personal preference. Nope: you are. Quote: One small problem there...you are the one introducing the garbage into the database. Nope: you are. The good thing there is that I've got 17435 approved contributions under my belt, and you've got 250. Makes me wonder why I even bother continuing this ridiculous argument... So I'll stop, and instead I'll focus on contributing some more of these correct entries. If Ken feels they're "garbage" too, he can stop me any time. Have fun! | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Can I scream now? Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Let's play the devil's advocate, here: how would you know, exactly? After all, you've decided not to record the difference between these two credits in your database, so how would you even know whether he's more often credited as "Devito" or as "DeVito"? You don't. I, on the other hand, know EXACTLY what the balance between the two variants in my database is. So who's got the accurate data? This may be strictly theory for Mr. DeVito, but I'm sure there are plenty examples where this gets a lot more pressing: you concede that you're willing to change the common name when the balance shifts, yet you refuse to actually RECORD entries that may shift the balance. I can't believe you don't see the gaping holes in this approach?! You sure make a lot of assumptions. Let me try again, since you still don't seem to get it. If he is credited as 'Danny Devito', and I have audited the title, I enter him that way because that is what the rules tell me to do. If he is credited as 'DANNY DEVITO', I enter him following standard capitalization rules, again, because that is what the rules tell me to do. You, on the other hand, will enter 'DANNY DEVITO' as 'Danny 'Devito' based on what exactly? Since it isn't based on standard capitalization rules, which I have provided and you have chosen to ignore, it must be based on personal preference. Personal preference, last time I checked, isn't allowed by the rules. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: You are not following the rules, you are following your own personal preference. As I said, I have given you a reference to 'standard capitalization rules for names'. It isn't something I made up, it is something I found online. If you choose to ignore it, that is fine, but it speaks volumes as to your motives here. When you consider how T!M spells his own name, it becomes easy to see why he might be confused about how Danny DeVito's name would properly be spelled. Seriously, though, it is interesting how T!M persists in ignoring the standard capitalization rules you have provided from englishplus.com and instead replaces those rules with his own personal preference without providing any proof other than "because I say it is so." No wonder he thinks he's winning the argument. He only plays by his own made-up rules. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting Unicus69:
Quote: One small problem there...you are the one introducing the garbage into the database. Nope: you are. The good thing there is that I've got 17435 approved contributions under my belt, and you've got 250. Makes me wonder why I even bother continuing this ridiculous argument... Ah, the contribution card. I wondered when you were going to try and play it. I didn't really think you would, as it is such a ridiculous stat, but you did so... Exactly how many of those profiles were 'real' contributions and how many were part of the inital batch upload? I have done the math, did you do the math before you tried to discredit me with this idiotic stat? You have been a member of Invelos for 670 days. Your number works out to 26 contributions a day. That's more than 1 contribution per hour. You must be a machine to be able to produce that volume. I, on the other hand, missed the initial batch upload. That might explain why I am only averaging 1 contribution every 3 days. But, hey, if that artificial stat makes you feel good... Quote: Nope: you are.
Isn't this fun? We could do this for days - I'm game! I can't see how you are game. With all those contributions you do in a single day it is any wonder you have time to post at all. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 4 5 6 7 8 ...17 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|