Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5 Previous Next
|
Title of this upcoming Star Trek blu-ray set? |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting hal9g:
Quote: I've expressed my reasons for why people who believe that "Star Trek + Star Trek Into Darkness" is part of the Title, should not be dismissed as idiots. Since no one has done that I'm wondering why you feel the need for such expression. I for one am able to disagree with someone without thinking them an idiot.
--------------- How do you characterize comments like this: Quote: So if I'm a complete moron I would include the content titles even though there is a distinct title for the box set. And I would blame the rules committee and Ken for approving said rules, and exploiting my stupidity. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: Oh boy, the natives are getting restless - again. And people wonder why Ken has virtually abandoned the forums??
FWIW: I believe the issue at hand can be argued both ways. As the rules are inconclusive, anyone pretending to know The Answer needs to take a close look in the mirror and ask him-/herself if that's the image of Truth. Thank you. That's all I've been trying to get across. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: How do you characterize comments like this:
Quote: So if I'm a complete moron I would include the content titles even though there is a distinct title for the box set. And I would blame the rules committee and Ken for approving said rules, and exploiting my stupidity. Morons are much smarter than idiots, so I characterize you as overreacting. --------------- |
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Ok here is an example of what I see these handled based on what I see in my collection Please note each film of the trilogy is on the front cover The title of this is "The Bourne Trilogy" with child profiles of each film What it is not titled is "The Bourne Trilogy: The Bourne Identity The Bourne Supremacy The Bourne Ultimatum" Because the "Star Trek + Star Trek: Into Darkness" are clearly separated from the package title I see no reason what they need to be included in the title. This is a multi-film box set, the film titles will be taken care of in the child profiles. It really seems like there are a lot of people slapping their male genitalia on the table to fight over which one is bigger as opposed to just looking at the packaging and looking at what is actually the title and what is extra marketing garbage. I read through all these posts and read all the pointless arguing and someone owes me ten minutes of my life back There is nothing wrong with harmless debate, but this thread has gone way past that.. People will disagree and there is nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree. | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
| Registered: June 26, 2013 | Reputation: | Posts: 694 |
| Posted: | | | | i prefer for this boxset: Exklusive Tarantino Kollektion: Reservoir Dogs Pulp Fiction From Dusk Till Dawn Jackie Brown as titel. | | |
the real BirthYear OverView |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DorianGray: Quote: Could you please fight your personal battles somewhere else? I like verbal MMA. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | Posts: 186 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Quoting DorianGray:
Quote: Could you please fight your personal battles somewhere else? I like verbal MMA. Meh, real MMA is much better. | | | "The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself, with desire for what its monstrous laws have made monstrous and unlawful." |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5 Previous Next
|
|