Quoting kdh1949:

Quote:
But just because you interpret things one way and vote NO but I interpret things another way and vote YES doesn't mean that your interpreteation is any more valid than mine.  Just because you say something doesn't make it so.  You admit there is no concensus and no decision -- so why do you persist in acting as if your way is the ONLY way?

Do I? If you feel better, you can always add a virtual "in my opinion" to my posts.

There you go again, Rho. There are NUMEROUS films that use the equivalent of a divider, all you have to do is look for them.

Skip

Quoting RHo:

Quote:
Usually movie credits don't have dividers. They may have different size of space between credits and different kind of arrangements of roles and group roles. But they don't have the equivalent to the kind of dividers implemented in profiler.

You have them in
Flashdance:
- The Flashdancers
- The Rocksteady Crew
Varian's War
- Berlin
- New York
- Washington
- Marseille

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
[...] it was talked about and a consensus was reached [...]
the a situation gets destabilized all over again. [...]

It was talked about several times, yes. But a consensus was never reached and the situation was never stable.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
18-14 is a majority and as a result a consensus. I have not seen anything that would say we need two-thirds or 80% or anything of the sort.

Skip

Majority and consensus are two different things in my opinion. In order to reach a consensus most (almost all) people have to agree and not only a majority.

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
I'm following what was actually established

I don't think any clear path has really been established. Contributions with all three variants get accepted and declined on a case by case basis. And remember: a very small majority has voted to not use dividers at all for all three cases.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
Rho:

You continually state yoir opinion as if it were factual. Please stop it. you are not god and your opinion has no more value than anyone else's, except apparently to you.

Skip

I have never said that my opinion has more value than anybody else's. How can I state anything else than my opinion in this forum? Do I really have to add IMO to every post?

Quoting RHo:

Quote:
Quoting kdh1949:

Quote:
But just because you interpret things one way and vote NO but I interpret things another way and vote YES doesn't mean that your interpreteation is any more valid than mine.  Just because you say something doesn't make it so.  You admit there is no concensus and no decision -- so why do you persist in acting as if your way is the ONLY way?

Do I? If you feel better, you can always add a virtual "in my opinion" to my posts.

I said this after you said

Quote:
Maybe you have been abusing dividers for group roles for 8 month. I'm sure some users have done this as well.

Your use of the word abusing sounds suspiciously like you think your method is the only correct one.  If your way isn't the ONLY way, why would you consider another way an abuse of dividers?

Quote:
But there is no consensus here and definitely non decision. I have not be using them and voted against them. And some other users have done this as well and voiced their opinion here.

I agree that there 's not consensus - and probably wouldn't use dividers that way most times myself.  But that doesn't mean that to do so is wrong either.  Some other users have done the opposite as well and have also voiced their opinion here.

There is clearly a reasoned difference of opinion -- with both sides wanting the other side to "keep it local."

The discussion of Group Roles vs dividers represents a distinction without a difference.  The only problem I see with using dividers to separate roles (assuming there's a divider in the actual credits like in Giga's Flashdance or Varian's War examples) is the lack of a way to end the group (though a blank divider could serve that purpost).