Author |
Message |
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Ken it's maybe the time to use the rules here and ban someone from the forum. Read his post history and you will see that he have same attitude since his first post. I seriously think that the fact that he change is avatar to personified "Skipnet50" last week was a complete violation of the rules.
I talk about "bbbbb" aka "Wasserglas" aka "skipnnet 50" and probably some other alias |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote: Ken it's maybe the time to use the rules here and ban someone from the forum. Read his post history and you will see that he have same attitude since his first post. I seriously think that the fact that he change is avatar to personified "Skipnet50" last week was a complete violation of the rules.
I talk about "bbbbb" aka "Wasserglas" aka "skipnnet 50" and probably some other alias While I don't condon the actions of this particular user, according to the forum rules as I read them, he hasn't done anything that warrants banning him from the forums. Impersonating another forum user other than an Invelos employee, while annoying, is not a bannable offence. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection | | | Last edited: by Bad Father |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote: While I don't condon the actions of this particular user, according to the forum rules as I read them, he hasn't done anything that warrants banning him from the forums. Impersonating another forum user other than an Invelos employee, while annoying, is not a bannable offence. the keywords 8ballMax: "Bannable" offenses include, but are not limited to, ... would mean if i understand this correctly: any behavior that is not mentioned and is disliked by Invelos could be sanctioned. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 742 |
| Posted: | | | | Yup, but it's gotta be disliked by Invelos, not by the community. So whatever you or me think appropriate is not really worth getting fussed about, as it probably won't have any effect on Ken's take on things. Just to be clear: this is not an attempt to justify or endorse the bahavior of "Wasserglas Skippnet50 bbbbb", I've said my piece on this user back when it all started and don't have anything to add or retract. I think it's safe to say that Ken WILL do what he deems necessary if and when he encounters someone or something that he dislikes enough to ban. Until then, just let it be, he's surely not worth the hassle (we could recourse to HBC instead...) | | | Lutz |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: I shed bitter tears, thats' true, but promised as far back as in September 2007 to never contribute again. And I always hold my promises. You do? And how comes this?? | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Did he use this source for is contribution note again?
"Always write 'Source: DVD', it doesn't matter where the datas are coming from." |
|
Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote: Ken it's maybe the time to use the rules here and ban someone from the forum. Read his post history and you will see that he have same attitude since his first post. I seriously think that the fact that he change is avatar to personified "Skipnet50" last week was a complete violation of the rules.
I talk about "bbbbb" aka "Wasserglas" aka "skipnnet 50" and probably some other alias I find it a very useful feature that if you block someone, and that person changes the alias, (s)he remains blocked. Surprised me at first, but this is actually useful to keep track of the changing names. By the way, I only blocked this notorious troublemaker. | | | Hans |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote: Ken it's maybe the time to use the rules here and ban someone from the forum. Read his post history and you will see that he have same attitude since his first post. I seriously think that the fact that he change is avatar to personified "Skipnet50" last week was a complete violation of the rules.
I talk about "bbbbb" aka "Wasserglas" aka "skipnnet 50" and probably some other alias AESP_pres is a brazen-faced liar! I never used the alias "skipn net 50". So please do not ban me, Ken. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: Quoting bbbbb:
Quote: I shed bitter tears, thats' true, but promised as far back as in September 2007 to never contribute again. And I always hold my promises.
You do? And how comes this??
No idea. I guess, someone has had my current alias back then, after all bbbbb as a username is not that unusual. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote: Did he use this source for is contribution note again?
"Always write 'Source: DVD', it doesn't matter where the datas are coming from." No, the originator wrote: ---- corrected edition 1. The edition does not have to be on the cover. However it should be 'taken from the DVD box': http://i15.tinypic.com/6ps0a68.jpg 2. The contribution will help to distinguish between this 2-Disc Edition and the single-disc release with the same title. ---- This clearly proves, that the aforesaid contribution cannot come from me. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Quoting AESP_pres:
Quote: Ken it's maybe the time to use the rules here and ban someone from the forum. Read his post history and you will see that he have same attitude since his first post. I seriously think that the fact that he change is avatar to personified "Skipnet50" last week was a complete violation of the rules.
I talk about "bbbbb" aka "Wasserglas" aka "skipnnet 50" and probably some other alias
AESP_pres is a brazen-faced liar! I never used the alias "skipnnet 50". It was skip pnet50 including same avatar and tagline as the original - anyway, no reason to insult AESP_pres! | | | Thorsten | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | bbbbb, That is obvious a problem if you change your user name everytime. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
AESP_pres is a brazen-faced liar! I never used the alias "skipnnet 50".
So please do not ban me, Ken. Explain why the only post made by skipn net 50 is on your list of post? Post in questionThink that everything is here before talking. I don't give negative often, but I don't think that it will be a surprise for you to get this . Next time think before insulting someone Edit : it's "pp" and not "nn", but a typo change nothing on the general idea. The insult was unecessary | | | Last edited: by Jimmy S |
|
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote:
Edit : it's "pp" and not "nn", but a typo change nothing on the general idea. The insult was unecessary Yes, let's set the record straight: the user formerly known as Wasserglas, now bbbbb, posted as Skippnet50, using the same avatar and tagline as Skipnet50. | | | -- Enry | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Quoting goblinsdoitall:
Quote: Quoting bbbbb:
Quote: I shed bitter tears, thats' true, but promised as far back as in September 2007 to never contribute again. And I always hold my promises.
You do? And how comes this??
No idea. I guess, someone has had my current alias back then, after all bbbbb as a username is not that unusual. I don't know if that would even be possible, two different users sharing the same screen name in different times. If that's technically possible (I doubt that), I think it should be fixed and made not possible. [EDIT: it seems that it actually is technically possible to use old nicks that are not used any more. I think that should be fixed]. However, as far as I know, each user has an individual profile that stays the same regardless of the screen names they change. If I navigate those Contribution comments for [7321921226595.5] and click on the name of the contributor ( bbbbb), your profile shows up. Besides, a Google search on invelos.com shows no posting activity from any other "bbbbb". Curious and curiouser. | | | -- Enry | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 413 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: No idea. I guess, someone has had my current alias back then, after all bbbbb as a username is not that unusual. If you change your screen name, it is changed in all instances even in the contribution history. Contribution history always shows each user's current name. Therefore it is impossible that the bbbbb who contributed that Harry Potter profile is someone else. | | | Last edited: by Jykke |
|