.

Unicus:

I misunderstood you, sorry. But I made ONE comment and you chose to jump into the middle of it. Trust me, my friend you don't know half of what you believe yoou know about me, or what makes me tick. I don't want to fight with you or anyone else, but as I said to Neill; I have been beaten far too long expect NOTHING from me, UNTIL you (generic) are willing to behave in a manner which is consistent with the way you want to be treated. There are some here who are beyond hope, and I shan't be naming them, nor will I go into details, it would be far too long. Enough is enough. Get off my back and stop sniping at everything (literally) that I say.

You(generic) can't handle the TRUTH!!!

Skip

I hope that this post will close those sterile discussions.

First, I never said I do not want rules at all, I said that strict application of  rules that are too precise was not a good thing. But as my statements are always distorted to try to mask my opinion, by one user that posts fifteen times more than me, I stupidly tried to explain my position. I apologize for that.

I made all this fuss because I wanted to alert about a situation that I found bad for Invelos. As I write DVD critics on a french site (I've been read nearly 400 000 times), and as I promoted DVD profiler on the  forum of the same site, I received posts of people who do not speak english and say they are fed up to have their contributions refused with comments that they did not understand. I think this is a bad sign that DVDs as "300", "Fur", "Spider-man 3" or"Death Proof" have not yet been contributed, though in the past the french community was very active. For saying that I was just called a whiner.

I tried to be positive, proposing a system that could solve both problems of contributions (too much ping pong changes in places where there are many contributors, and lack of first contribution in other places). Skip promptly used his wonderful skill to make the thread go wrong. I stupidly tried another time, and got the same result. I also apologize for that.

I just sent here a translation that could be a good base to solve runmovies's demand, and I just got the usual Skip's attacks, hidden behind chosen hypocrite words (thanks to the new system, he stopped direct insults, and writes he "likes" me while sending floods of venom). I remember that when I said that first contribution should be as complete as possible, I became the target of people who said that if they wanted to send a profile without cast list and overview, it was their right. But it seems that I've not the right to send "only" 90% of a long translation.

I hope long life to this marvellous tool which is dvdprofiler...

Bybye. I'll miss some of you, but one person threw me away.

Quoting lyonsden5:

Quote:
Looks like it's time to re-block the recently unblocked. 

While I realize bloviating itself is not something you can give a justifiable negative vote to it makes the forums unenjoyable (is that a word?) for me.

Hopefully the new system will kick in soon and threads will stay a bit more on-topic.

I was thinking the same thing, but that did not stop me to play


Santa Claus' Red Elf

as I have seen enough posts which fitted this description lately:

Quoting "What's the best way to use the reputation system?":

Quote:
Posts with name-calling, belittling, or other rude or insensitive comments can be given negative feedback.

And I want to prevent this from happening too often:

Quoting surfeur51:

Quote:
Bybye. I'll miss some of you, but one person threw me away.

Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet:

Quote:
[quote deleted by me]

Martin you have way too much time on your hands