|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next
|
Capitalization of 'I, ROBOT'? |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CubbyUps: Quote: All I will say is that I voted for 'i, Robot'.
To me this matches the cover the closest and follows the rules as I understand them.
In any case, I own this movie and I have kept the title as 'i, Robot' locally. While we do take the title from the front cover, we do not try to match the cover as close as possible regarding capitalisation. But we use standard language capitalisation instead. The capitalisation rules for the English language is spelled out explicitly in the rules. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote: Funny that no one has voted for what the cover actually says, it says: i, ROBOT Because that would be against the rules. The rules tell us how we have to capitalise a title. And they do not tell us to use the capitalisation from the cover. |
| Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Darxon: Quote: We can either do an exact copy of the printing and enter "i, ROBOT" into the title field. However, applying this approach will lead to numerous necessary changes in other profiles, rendering such profiles either useless (regarding easy searchability through the title field) or nonsensical (all uppercase, random changes of upper and lowercase and so on). search is not case sensitive. -Agrare |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: Quoting Patsa:
Quote: Funny that no one has voted for what the cover actually says, it says: i, ROBOT Because that would be against the rules. The rules tell us how we have to capitalise a title. And they do not tell us to use the capitalisation from the cover. Hey, don't ruin the joke with your rational thinking! | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote: Quoting northbloke:
Quote: Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote: All I will say is that I voted for 'i, Robot'.
To me this matches the cover the closest and follows the rules as I understand them.
In any case, I own this movie and I have kept the title as 'i, Robot' locally. Nice to hear from a "no" voter in this discussion - can I ask - how do you reconcile that decision with other DVD titles that are all in upper or lower case? Are you advocating that we follow the capitalisation of the front cover title? For example: MATRIX RELOADED not Matrix Reloaded, or music within instead of Music Within. If not, why treat this title differently?
Well, I think I can see why: because there is a deliberate unusual capitalization of a single word, and that's a different kettle of fish from, say, an ALL CAPS title. That said, I also believe that the Rules do not provide for such an exception, or at least I can't find that, so I would probably have voted for "I, Robot", and the results of this poll seem to confirm that is the interpretation by most users. Be as it may, a clarification (even better a few examples) by the Powers That Be would be welcome. I personally wouldn't have objections one way or the other as long as there is a clear rule.
p.s. Hal and Skip, pleeeease stop it. You both made your point very clear, endless repeating is just useless. Yes basically that's it. For example, here is another example of a small i in a title. Basically almost the same thing. Three options as I see it. 1. THE i INSIDE 2. The i Inside 3. The I Inside To me the small 'i' is done on purpose to draw attention to it for whatever reason. So for me it is more important to replicate what the cover is as closely as possible taking into consideration the reason the title is the way it is and capitalization. So in the case of the above, The i Inside is the best match. But in such cases I keep it local. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | Just remembered that I asked about this before. Same topic |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
| Registered: February 26, 2008 | Posts: 29 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CubbyUps: Quote: For example, here is another example of a small i in a title.
. . .
Basically almost the same thing. Three options as I see it. 1. THE i INSIDE 2. The i Inside 3. The I Inside
To me the small 'i' is done on purpose to draw attention to it for whatever reason. So for me it is more important to replicate what the cover is as closely as possible taking into consideration the reason the title is the way it is and capitalization. So in the case of the above, The i Inside is the best match.
But in such cases I keep it local. Yes, the small "i" is done on purpose, because it is a stylized printing not intended to be the true capitalization of the actual title. To see this, one only need to look at the back cover, which actually says "The I Inside". (On another note, the back cover of the debated title reads "I, ROBOT".) As recommended, I've changed my contribution notes to remove the link to the Fox online store. I've also referred to "i, ROBOT" as a stylized printing to distinguish it from a stylized title. Here's what I mean: Stylized printings (correct title in parentheses): "good night, and good luck." (Good Night, and Good Luck.)"planet earth" (Planet Earth)"TRAINING DAY" (Training Day)Stylized title: eXistenZNow you may argue that it's not our place to deduce the author's intent. But any rendering that does not strictly follow the capitalization on the front cover - such as "The i Inside", "i, Robot" and yes, "Planet Earth" - is in fact deducing intent, even in cases such as "Planet Earth" where most people would consider the intent blatently obvious. | | | One man's rip-off is another man's homage. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | As I pointed out before, I keep such titles as "i, Robot" & "The i Inside" like that in my local database.
But whatever is demanded by the rules is ok for the main database.
But perhaps the only way to correct this is to state in the rules "Take the title only from the front cover exactly as it is shown, regardless of capitalization. However if their is no title or the title is composed of symbols or a picture then take the title from elsewhere on the dvd case(ideally from the credit block) and if not available then from the film itself.
Just my opinion and whatever the rules are is fine by me, but something like this I keep local as I said before. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tony Le: Quote: Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote: For example, here is another example of a small i in a title.
. . .
Basically almost the same thing. Three options as I see it. 1. THE i INSIDE 2. The i Inside 3. The I Inside
To me the small 'i' is done on purpose to draw attention to it for whatever reason. So for me it is more important to replicate what the cover is as closely as possible taking into consideration the reason the title is the way it is and capitalization. So in the case of the above, The i Inside is the best match.
But in such cases I keep it local. Yes, the small "i" is done on purpose, because it is a stylized printing not intended to be the true capitalization of the actual title. To see this, one only need to look at the back cover, which actually says "The I Inside". (On another note, the back cover of the debated title reads "I, ROBOT".)
As recommended, I've changed my contribution notes to remove the link to the Fox online store. I've also referred to "i, ROBOT" as a stylized printing to distinguish it from a stylized title. Here's what I mean:
Stylized printings (correct title in parentheses):
"good night, and good luck." (Good Night, and Good Luck.) "planet earth" (Planet Earth) "TRAINING DAY" (Training Day)
Stylized title:
eXistenZ
Now you may argue that it's not our place to deduce the author's intent. But any rendering that does not strictly follow the capitalization on the front cover - such as "The i Inside", "i, Robot" and yes, "Planet Earth" - is in fact deducing intent, even in cases such as "Planet Earth" where most people would consider the intent blatently obvious. Tony: While I understand what you are saying and why re: The i Inside. You are making the same mistake you made with i, Robot. Pleasde read the rules, there is NO possessive involved, therefore anything from anywhere except the Front Cover is not acceptable, I don't care where you are getting it from. The Rule says Front Cover, not spine, not back cover, not some other site or book or even from the film, the FRONT COVER. Once you understand that then we can discuss the issues of the i or I. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | I thought it would be useful to paste in the contribution notes as they now are
*Updated Notes* Forum thread: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=265945
Title is taken from the front cover. However, the lower-case "i" and all-caps "ROBOT" on the cover is a stylized printing, so I have applied established rules of English capitalization.
There is some debate over "i, Robot" vs. "I, Robot". The database has overwhelming precedent for the latter case. Consider covers where the titles are printed entirely in lower case - e.g, "planet earth" and "good night, and good luck." It's obvious these are stylized and that they should be listed in the database following the rules of English capitalization. The implication is that the Invelos rule "Check capitalization of the title" is not intended to mean "Always follow the capitalization as printed even if it conflicts with established rules of grammar"; rather, it means to check capitalization WITH REGARD TO those established rules. | | | Paul |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tony Le: Quote:
As recommended, I've changed my contribution notes to remove the link to the Fox online store. I've also referred to "i, ROBOT" as a stylized printing to distinguish it from a stylized title. I think what you should do is just change the notes to say "Title taken from front cover" Just get rid of the rest of the documentation and you should be ok. | | | Paul |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: While I understand what you are saying and why re: The i Inside. You are making the same mistake you made with i, Robot. Pleasde read the rules, there is NO possessive involved, therefore anything from anywhere except the Front Cover is not acceptable, I don't care where you are getting it from. The Rule says Front Cover, not spine, not back cover, not some other site or book or even from the film, the FRONT COVER. Once you understand that then we can discuss the issues of the i or I.
Skip The issue is, and in my mind, always was about 'i' vs. 'I'. Why you turned it into a discussion about where to get the title from, I have no idea. Tony Le, in the spirit of good will I am guessing, has changed his notes so as not to refer to any outside source. I hope that will allow us to get back to the real issue here. As to that issue. The rule tells us to take the title from the fron cover. It also tells us to, "Check capitalization of the title." In addition, it includes a seciton...a very badly written one I must say...that talks about what should and shouldn't be capitalized. Most people, at least the ones who have expressed an opinion, believe that means we are to use 'standard capitalization rules'. If that is the case, then the answer is 'I, Robot'. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for the heads up, paul. I agree with what you said Tony should do. But nonethelss removing the outside source I voted neutral. I don't agree with the contribution for the reasons i outlined in my discussion relative to stylization. biut I am not comfortable necessarily voting No. But I think the correct answer for Tony is to leave it ALONE for the Online and do what he wants locally, that is what i did with it, and that there can be NO QUESTION follows the Rules to the letter. I think the whole debate over stylization is far to subjective, sometimes in titles it can be quite apparent as we have discussed numerous time, but i don't think this is one of those cases. It's why I also have never changed it since someone took it to i, Robot some months back. I don't like it PERSONALLY, but it's not about what I like personally when we are discussing the Online, i, Robot absolutely followed the Rules. I, Robot can cussed, dis-cussed and re-cussed until the cows come home.
That's my advice to you, Tony.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: It also tells us to, "Check capitalization of the title." In addition, it includes a seciton...a very badly written one I must say...that talks about what should and shouldn't be capitalized.
Most people, at least the ones who have expressed an opinion, believe that means we are to use 'standard capitalization rules'. If that is the case, then the answer is 'I, Robot'. I think that's the crux of the problem - "Check capitalization of the title." is incredibly vague and can be interpreted to mean anything you want it to mean. I think by saying that "i, Robot" is an acceptable title we are leading into a whole load of trouble. I was just looking through my database for other examples of stylised capitalisation and I found: AbSoLuTeLy faBuLouSIf "i, Robot" is considered correct, then so would this. And any others that people will find. And you know people will submit them! |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CubbyUps: Quote: But perhaps the only way to correct this is to state in the rules "Take the title only from the front cover exactly as it is shown, regardless of capitalization. However if their is no title or the title is composed of symbols or a picture then take the title from elsewhere on the dvd case(ideally from the credit block) and if not available then from the film itself. Do you really want to capitalise the following titles as credited? a fish Called Wanda WINGS of DESIRE eASt is eASt LES iNVASiON BARBARES BREakING ThE WaVES monsoon WEDDING ERIK the VIKING a zed & TWO NOUGHTS A HarDd Day's NiGhT What about BOB? Lock SToCk & Two SmokinNg BarrEls mURiel's Wedding |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|