Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
Two user now abusing their voting privilege. I would hope Ken would suspend both of you. You don't have the right, Lopek

Skip

Don't have what right? I own the DVD, I have the right to vote. 

You have the right to vote to you do NOT have the right to impose your will upon another user expecting them to set data up in a format of YOUR particular desire, data that is correct AS CREDITED.

You may request, you may not demand.

Once again this not about me, this about certain users ABUSING their voting privileges and attempting to impose their will on another user. I have made an offer as to what would have been a more appropriate method of doing this, Lopek. But as long as you and anyone else try and place demands upon me I will ignore you. You are not known for being particularly polite, in fact you usually rather boorish. So do what you want.the data IS Correct AS CREDITED and that cannot be argued.

Skip

Skip, explain something to me, please. How is someone asking you to change your submission any different than you asking someone to change their vote?

EDIT: Let's not say "any different", let's say "any worse".

Rick:

You are missing the point entirely. And I agree with what you are saying, BTW. The point is that we have two users who are, in my book, abusing their voting privilege in an attempt to place additional demads of time spent on another user so that THEY can get the data formatted as they want it to be. That way they don't have to go back later and modify it themselves. They don't have the right to make that demand, and that is what constitutes abuse of their voting. I have the right to say I will not go beyond this point and spend the extra time.

I have suggested a method whereby they might achieve their desired goal and as yet yhey have not chosen to consider it. So as far as I am concerned it is up to them.

Am I angry, you bet, Rick. I think I have every right to be. The only reason I mentioned the time at all is to illustrate that I spend enough time, more than enough to put up with someone demanding MORE.  If they want to stand their ground, then let THEM invest THEIR time making whatever change they feel is needed.

Skip

Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
Skip, explain something to me, please. How is someone asking you to change your submission any different than you asking someone to change their vote?

EDIT: Let's not say "any different", let's say "any worse".

Come on Skip, we know you like to ignore the difficult ones, but have at it, do. Or am I being demanding? Is your time better spent making a few thousand submissions?

The sad thing is, you're wasting all your time in this thread, Skip.

Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
Skip, explain something to me, please. How is someone asking you to change your submission any different than you asking someone to change their vote?

EDIT: Let's not say "any different", let's say "any worse".

Come on Skip, we know you like to ignore the difficult ones, but have at it, do. Or am I being demanding? Is your time better spent making a few thousand submissions?

I have explained this nadj. From my point of view they are abusing their vote in an attempt to force me to spend more time in researching the link, they did not make a request. I will deal with bad data and I will deal with requests, i will not deal with flat out demands, they don't have that right.

And again I have offered them a way out.

Skip

Quoting Lopek:

Quote:
That's fine Skip. But James advised you of the problem that you were causing common name linking in a polite way.

The issue for me is that instead of taking the info graciously and making the change/withdrawing your contribution, or discussing it with James privately, you decided to throw a public tantrum at James. 

Like I have said too many time recently, get over yourself old man.

James made no indication about breaking linking, he wanted ME to establish the linking. There is NO EVIDENCE of linking on this title, Andrew.

Skip