|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 36 37 38 39 40 Previous Next
|
Invelos = Terrible support |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote: Quoting Silence_of_Lambs:
Quote: From the last 7 pages we can at least tell one thing:
Moderation isn't working anymore (if it ever did).
Hell, for half of the statements made here another user was banned for several weeks. I suggest that every participant in this thread acts as if he/she/it as if he/she/it received a two weeks ban.
I'll start
Especially now it has nothing to do with Profiler. The tone is taking a very disagreeable turn. If it further proves the management of this forum and program. Is worse than allocating people lifeboats on the Titanic. Then by all means let this madness continue. | | | Last edited: by ShinyDiscGuy |
| | JonM | Registered 28 Dec 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 343 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirtualScot: Quote: Quoting JonM:
Quote: Quoting Silence_of_Lambs:
Quote: From the last 7 pages we can at least tell one thing:
Moderation isn't working anymore (if it ever did).
Hell, for half of the statements made here another user was banned for several weeks. I suggest that every participant in this thread acts as if he/she/it as if he/she/it received a two weeks ban.
I'll start
Especially now it has nothing to do with Profiler. The tone is taking a very disagreeable turn.
If it further proves the management of this forum and program. Is worse than allocating people lifeboats on the Titanic.
Then by all means let this madness continue. Well, that was why I posted originally at all, I suppose. I know Jimmy can more than handle this prick, but still Bob's desperate move from "I'm ignoring you because you never contribute" to "I'm ignoring you because you can't speak proper" is unfortunate. | | | Jon "When Mister Safety Catch Is Not On, Mister Crossbow Is Not Your Friend."
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote:
Well, that was why I posted originally at all, I suppose. I know Jimmy can more than handle this prick, but still Bob's desperate move from "I'm ignoring you because you never contribute" to "I'm ignoring you because you can't speak proper" is unfortunate. I think you may need to look up 'ignoring' in the dictionary, because I am doing anything but. You also seems to have trouble grasping the context of my responses. My point was, and has always been, that parasites who only reap the benefits of the program and refuse to reciprocate in kind have no legitimate standing and should either 'put-up or shut-up.' I have no problem with Jimmy expressing himself on the workings of the program. He is only being slammed in response to his off-topic attacks on myself and other contributors. And frankly, I doubt he can handle crossing the street without a boy scout to help him. Call me a reactionary if you will, but as long as he restrains himself from such he gets a pass. Unlike you, he contributes to the database. And it is 'properly' fyi. Adverbs: learn them, love them. | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: Quoting JonM:
Quote:
Well, that was why I posted originally at all, I suppose. I know Jimmy can more than handle this prick, but still Bob's desperate move from "I'm ignoring you because you never contribute" to "I'm ignoring you because you can't speak proper" is unfortunate. I think you may need to look up 'ignoring' in the dictionary, because I am doing anything but. You also seems to have trouble grasping the context of my responses. My point was, and has always been, that parasites who only reap the benefits of the program and refuse to reciprocate in kind have no legitimate standing and should either 'put-up or shut-up.' I have no problem with Jimmy expressing himself on the workings of the program. He is only being slammed in response to his off-topic attacks on myself and other contributors. Call me a reactionary if you will, but as long as he restrains himself from such he gets a pass. Unlike you, he contributes to the database. And it is 'properly' fyi. Adverbs: learn them, love them. If that was case no one would be aloud to have an opinion on anything. |
| | JonM | Registered 28 Dec 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 343 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: I think you may need to look up 'ignoring' in the dictionary, because I am doing anything but. My point was, and has always been, that parasites who only reap the benefits of the program and refuse to reciprocate in kind have no legitimate standing and should either 'put-up or shut-up.' I have no problem with Jimmy expressing himself on the workings of the program. He is only being slammed in response to his off-topic attacks on myself and other contributors as well his continued use of profanity. As long as he restrains himself from such he gets a pass. Unlike you, he contributes to the database. And it is 'properly' fyi. Adverbs: learn them, love them. Bloody hell, you're thick. "Ignoring" as in disregarding the opinions of those who don't meet your standards of contributions, etc. It was you who first dismissed Jimmy based on his English, therefore you ignored his point. Anyway I'll leave it to Jimmy to tell you why your last post is so very funny considering the whole nature of this thread. And I was being ironic when I used "proper" instead of "properly". As in, "you don't speak proper wot wiv you being forin 'n' all". | | | Jon "When Mister Safety Catch Is Not On, Mister Crossbow Is Not Your Friend."
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirtualScot: Quote:
If that was case no one would be aloud to have an opinion on anything. Clarify please. Are you referring to people who refuse to contribute or people who misuse language not being allowed. In the case of the former, it is more their opinion is meaningless in the later they simply run the danger of not always conveying their opinion effiectively or worse comprehensibly. | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirtualScot: Quote: If that was case no one would be aloud to have an opinion on anything. Or even allowed. --------------- |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote:
Bloody hell, you're thick. "Ignoring" as in disregarding the opinions of those who don't meet your standards of contributions, etc. It was you who first dismissed Jimmy based on his English, therefore you ignored his point. Anyway I'll leave it to Jimmy to tell you why your last post is so very funny considering the whole nature of this thread.
And I was being ironic when I used "proper" instead of "properly". As in, "you don't speak proper wot wiv you being forin 'n' all". I highly doubt that, but go ahead and try to soft-shoe you way out of it. I did not dismiss Jimmy, I dismissed his verbally incomprehesible attack on me. And he had no point, merely a factually untrue statement which I in fact addressed directly. |
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: Quoting VirtualScot:
Quote:
If that was case no one would be aloud to have an opinion on anything. Clarify please. Are you referring to people who contribute or people who misuse language not being allowed. In the case of the former, it is more their opinion is meaningless in the later it they simply run the danger of not always conveying their opinion effiectively or worse comprehensibly. Dismissing someone's opinion on the bases of there grammar it is not only cheap, but highly trivial . You refuse to argue the point in question cause you can't argue for a $hit. Your strategy is simple. Keep low blowing by digressing from the topic till eventually the other person gives up trying, and occasionally throw in some big words to pretend your intelligent and well informed (pretend to be a big man basically). |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Dude, I was not arguing with you, just asking for clarification on what you meant as it was unclear to me. The only relevant opinions, as in in regards to Invelos, I dismiss are those of non-contributing parasites. Such as: Quoting JonM: Quote: I never contributed much What exactly is the point you are trying to make? | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | @bob9000
I've been here just as long as you (if not longer), and to sink to your level I contribute to the online db a hell of a lot more than you do (try five times as much)....so, I can honestly say that your entire behaviour in this thread is dreadful.
In the past I have, in a moment of frustrated pique, resorted to the childish act of pointing out someone's low contribution levels. It achieved nothing other than to make me look like a total dick.
Calling people idiots, nitwits or some of the other, much stronger, names is unacceptable.
If you truly have been here as long as you say (and I truly don't remember you from Intervocative days), then you should know better. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: @bob9000
I've been here just as long as you (if not longer), and to sink to your level I contribute to the online db a hell of a lot more than you do (try five times as much)....so, I can honestly say that your entire behaviour in this thread is dreadful.
In the past I have, in a moment of frustrated pique, resorted to the childish act of pointing out someone's low contribution levels. It achieved nothing other than to make me look like a total dick.
Calling people idiots, nitwits or some of the other, much stronger, names is unacceptable.
If you truly have been here as long as you say (and I truly don't remember you from Intervocative days), then you should know better. Longer I think, if only by a few months to a year. And may i respectfully suggest you check your math, it is only a little over 3 times as much. I hear and respect your opinion, but do not in this instance share it. Other than my initial comment to the parasite, all of my subsequent comments have been restricted to those who attacked me. I will continue to defend myself from said attacks as viciously as I am able until they cease. How I am perceived is meaningless. FYI if you are truly curious you can check the old archived site to find me. I can even screencap my old member page which still has dozens of old pending contributions from the days before the transition when nothing was being processed. | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: Dude, I was not arguing with you, just asking for clarification on what you meant as it was unclear to me. The only relevant opinions, as in in regards to Invelos, i dismiss are those of non-contributing parasites. Such as:
Quoting JonM:
Quote: I never contributed much
What exactly is the point you are trying to make? Then i guess im a parasite as i don't contribute much. Because i think the system of contribution particularly in relation to cast and crew, is highly contentious given how vague the rules are in relation to governing it. You don't have to look far to find the results of that in this forum. And if you can't see that and just think everything is perfect, then your blind. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirtualScot: Quote: Quoting bob9000:
Quote: Dude, I was not arguing with you, just asking for clarification on what you meant as it was unclear to me. The only relevant opinions, as in in regards to Invelos, i dismiss are those of non-contributing parasites. Such as:
Quoting JonM:
Quote: I never contributed much
What exactly is the point you are trying to make?
Then i guess im a parasite as i don't contribute much. Because i think the system of contribution particularly in relation to cast and crew, is highly contentious given how vague the rules are in relation to governing it.
You don't have to look far to find the results of that in this forum. And if you can't see that and just think everything is perfect, then your blind. I never claimed that all was perfect, far from it, merely that abstainers should not complain, but rather contribute and THEN complain and then contribute some more. So you don't like the system as it stands. Work it from within. Be part of the solution instead of simply griping. For goodness sake, how hard is it to cast a few votes now and then? | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: Quoting VirtualScot:
Quote: Quoting bob9000:
Quote: Dude, I was not arguing with you, just asking for clarification on what you meant as it was unclear to me. The only relevant opinions, as in in regards to Invelos, i dismiss are those of non-contributing parasites. Such as:
Quoting JonM:
Quote: I never contributed much
What exactly is the point you are trying to make?
Then i guess im a parasite as i don't contribute much. Because i think the system of contribution particularly in relation to cast and crew, is highly contentious given how vague the rules are in relation to governing it.
You don't have to look far to find the results of that in this forum. And if you can't see that and just think everything is perfect, then your blind. I never claimed that all was perfect, far from it, merely that abstainers should not complain, but rather contribute and THEN complain and then contribute some more. So you don't like the system as it stands. Work it from within. Be part of the solution instead of simply griping. For goodness sake, how hard is it to cast a few votes now and then? Just listen to yourself. I mean for example i said i don't agree with the war Iraq, but by your logic i can't comment cause i never joined the army and fought in the war. |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bob9000: Quote: Moron, there is nothing at all wrong with what I wrote. As in English there are mutliple correct ways to express the same thought. Sorry, but what you wrote is not good French (As my English is not good English). You seem able to speak in a manner that French people can understand easily, but your sentences would never be used by French people. | | | Images from movies |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 36 37 38 39 40 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|