| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Practical, no
Easy to read, no
In fact, it's horrible. The are reason why books aren't 16:9. Long rows are very difficult to read.
Please change it back.
EDIT: I think I made my point... | | | | Last edited: by Kulju |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
xxxxxx TEST Jerk! BTW, I see it wide on page 2, but not on page 1. |
|
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,131 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
Quoting Kulju:
Quote:
xxxxxx TEST
Jerk!
BTW, I see it wide on page 2, but not on page 1. Seriously. The reason is because 2 replies, 1 on page 2 and 1 on page 3 are larger than everyone elses post. Maybe they are set at 200% |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | I checked that. On page 2, press CTRL-A (if on Windows) to highlight everything and look for a line that exceeds farther than it should. I couldn't see any. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yeah... I couldn't find anything too long on page 2 either. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,131 |
| | Posted: | | | | so post 4 on page 2 for you guys doesn't stretch past all of the others. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Nope... not at all for me. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Interesting twist.
Post #4 on page is from bbbbb. I quoted it and there was nothing off about it. I canceled the post and it took me back to page 2 - at normal width. I hit F5 to refresh the page and then it was wide again. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
xxxxx<snip>xxxx TEST You wouldn't mind editing your post to remove some of those x's, would ya? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
BTW, I see it wide on page 2, but not on page 1. Today I see the thread a little wide on page 1 and 2, and very wide on page 3. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
I think Ken is playing with us! The Forum Rules explicitly forbid to make claims of "inside information" related to Invelos, but honestly, I do not think that Ken is playing with us. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 1,982 |
| | Posted: | | | | This is so annoying to have to go all the way to the right to see if there is another page... Seriously, check the slider at the bottom of the image  |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | On the reply, you have to scroll right because of the post at the top of page 3 which has one line with a lot of X's without spaces, forcing the page wider.
This is not the case with page 2. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Page 1 is now wide for me, matching page 2. Page 1 was normal yesterday. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 1,982 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
This is not the case with page 2. The second page isn't as bad but ...  |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Filler to get us to
(continued on next page) | | | | Last edited: by Dr. Killpatient |
|