|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
Star Trek Fan Collective, The Poll |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Quoting Corne:
Quote:
A Season Descriptor refers to the content itself. Fan Collective refers to a collection of DVDs.
P.s. it would solve a lot of multiple title counts in the CLT when the season descriptor of TV series has to be put in the edition field
A season descriptor describes the group of episodes in that box of DVDs in exactly the same way that Alternative Realities does.
If I were to do this in windoze, it would look like this:
Star Trek | |--------->Voyager | |---------->Season 1
and
Star Trek | |----------Fan Collective | |-----------------Alternative Realities That's on another level. The season indicator refers to the feature itself and is being used for the title of the feature. The name Fan Collective is being used for a range of DVD releases, just like Walt Disney Treasures, The Horror Collection etc. Discussions like these just confirms the difficulty of entering TV Series into the database by the current rules and program. For a movie this discussion wouldn't even be there. Luckily I don't get frustrated. Everyone has his/her right to agree/disagree. Just contribute according to how you interpret the rules and if someone disagrees solve this in pm and when that doesn't solve anything take it to the forums. In many cases there's a 50-50 stance so no solution | | | Cor |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Corne: Quote: No, because a season indicator refers to the content itself and has to be put into the title field. The edition field is for the name of a collection of DVDs. "Fan Collective" is in my opinion the name for a collection of DVDs (Captain's Log, Borg etc.) and "Captain's Log" is the name for the actual episodes in this DVD set. Actually, 'Fan Collective' is the name of this series of releases. 'Captain's Log' is the name of this particular set in the series. Since the Proof of Purchase tab and the official website, not to mention every on-line retailer I have looked at, back up that opinion, I just can't understand why people are insisting that it isn't the case. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,282 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: Actually, 'Fan Collective' is the name of this series of releases. 'Captain's Log' is the name of this particular set in the series. Since the Proof of Purchase tab and the official website, not to mention every on-line retailer I have looked at, back up that opinion, I just can't understand why people are insisting that it isn't the case. This is what I am trying to get across too. And failing. | | | Last edited: by GreyHulk |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: ... Especially when they have the Star Trek: Fan Collective Collection (5 DVD Set)? If 'Fan Collective' is the edition, would that make this set, Title: Star Trek: Collection, Edition: Fan Collective? I found this very interesting, because I can remember similar discussion where many users claimed thet the included movies get the "Collection part" as Edition. Sorry, couldn't resist.Edit: Also I was not much agreeing with this, I can now see the reson of doing this. Still, learning every day. Sometimes I think my head explodes. (Damn, thought we have an exploding head emoticon ) Edit 2: Btw, this has been done by the child profiles of the "Star Trek: Alternate Realities Collective"* with out marking as Edition. (097368925946) * As there's just "Collective" on the cover, would this be Star Trek: Collective: Alternate Realities? But for the "Q" parts it would be Star Trek: Fan Collective: Q? And you would still treat it as episode indicater, even if there's just one episode? | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Star Trek | |----------Fan Collective | |-----------------Alternative Realities I can see Star Trek Alternative Realites Fan Collective on the cover. As Fan Collective is not a part of Alternative Realities i guess it's an Edition. | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | In this example... Star Wars: The Clone Wars Region 1 Released: 11/11/2008 Anamorphic 2.40:1 ...I can see STAR THE CLONE WARS WARS on the cover. Funny thing, it isn't entered that way. I have to wonder why? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting KinoNiki: Quote: Quoting CharlieM:
Quote: I am really beginning to understand the frustration of some users on this board, when we have to argue about things like this.
Then why argue, just lock your titles and get over it. There will never be a consensus for situations like this, nor will there ever be a rule for every possible situation that comes up. I don't ask for a rule for every situation, and if we as profilers cannot come to a consensus about this small item, then we truly have no desire to come to a consensus. we have 21 people one way 30 people the other way and neither side acknowledging the other. (I am guilty). There has been evidence offered from 2 sources (one is the package itself) as to how this should be handled. We are now down to arguing about the word Collective. I have stated that Collective and Collection are 2 different things. One is a noun, the other is an adjective. We are trying to treat them as the same word when they are not. Collective adj - marked by similarity among or with the members of a group (as applied here) Collection noun - something collected; especially : an accumulation of objects gathered for study, comparison, or exhibition or as a hobby (syn - library) This is a series release of episodes that are gathered together because of their similarity in topic. |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | To clarify.
I want a standard that can be applied across most profiles that will allow me to at least start with a consistent base.
I have a moderate size collection, and for me to go and audit every profile (just to ensure accuracy) is a daunting task. With this in mind, I must rely on fellow profilers to enter data that I need. I must be able to trust this data for consistency (which I can't at this point).
So we do need to discuss here in this forum, but to come to consensus, items have to be acknowledged and not just summarily rejected.
If you see a consensus building here, then you are far more optimistic than I.
Charlie |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote: I have stated that Collective and Collection are 2 different things. One is a noun, the other is an adjective. Not necessarily. "Collective" can be a noun as well (as in the Borg speaking of "The Collective", to stay within Star Trek terms). |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: In this example...
Star Wars: The Clone Wars Region 1 Released: 11/11/2008 Anamorphic 2.40:1
...I can see
STAR THE CLONE WARS WARS on the cover. Funny thing, it isn't entered that way. I have to wonder why? Ok, perhaps the point I wanted to make, wasn't clear. I can also clearly see Seoson 1 is part of Voyager is part of Star Trek. But in the op question, I can also see the variant Alternative Realities is part of Star Trek, so Fan Collective would be "free". Not just forceful Alternate Realities is part of Fan Collective is part of Star Trek. Just want to show the other POV, but I think it's a hard try to do this if opinions are made of stone. Btw, a 3 to 2 is not a bad poll result here in the forum, so with the poll and the third party sources, I can see no reason not to submit it as Star Trek: Fan Collective: Alternate Realities. | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 824 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote: Ok, perhaps the point I wanted to make, wasn't clear. It still isn't clear, at least to me. | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote: Quoting VirusPil:
Quote: Ok, perhaps the point I wanted to make, wasn't clear.
It still isn't clear, at least to me. Ok, last try. ---- 1) You see "The Fan Collective" as episode descriper of "Star Trek". And you see "Captain's Log" as episode descriper of "The Fan Collective". -> Title would be: "Star Trek: The Fan Collective: Captain's Log" Part of the rule: Quote: Episode descriptors are part of the title; separate them with a colon and space; e.g. "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". For multiple descriptors, use a colon and space for each break. --- 2) You see "The Fan Collective" as a descriper for a special collection (in this case a collection of the most liked episodes of Star Trek with theme Caiptain's Log, for the other parts of this collection: theme "Q", ...). (And you see "Captain's Log" as episode descriper of "Star Trek") -> Title would be: "Star Trek: Captain's Log" with Edition: "The Fan Collective" Part of the rule (bolded by me): Quote: The Edition field is for distinguishing between DVDs, and for indicating special versions and collections (for example The Criterion Collection, Widescreen, Full-Screen Edition, Director's Cut). --- |
| | Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote: Quoting Grendell:
Quote: Quoting VirusPil:
Quote: Ok, perhaps the point I wanted to make, wasn't clear.
It still isn't clear, at least to me.
Ok, last try.
---- 1) You see "The Fan Collective" as episode descriper of "Star Trek". And you see "Captain's Log" as episode descriper of "The Fan Collective". -> Title would be: "Star Trek: The Fan Collective: Captain's Log" Part of the rule:
Quote: Episode descriptors are part of the title; separate them with a colon and space; e.g. "Star Trek III: The Search for Spock". For multiple descriptors, use a colon and space for each break. --- 2) You see "The Fan Collective" as a descriper for a special collection (in this case a collection of the most liked episodes of Star Trek with theme Caiptain's Log, for the other parts of this collection: theme "Q", ...). (And you see "Captain's Log" as episode descriper of "Star Trek") -> Title would be: "Star Trek: Captain's Log" with Edition: "The Fan Collective" Part of the rule (bolded by me):
Quote: The Edition field is for distinguishing between DVDs, and for indicating special versions and collections (for example The Criterion Collection, Widescreen, Full-Screen Edition, Director's Cut). --- This explanation seems pretty clear to me. Needless to say that I'm in for option 2. | | | Cor |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|