Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Ken specifically addressed the issues that can arise regarding titles here: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=667247&messageID=2082773
"One-off rulings on individual titles are a waste of time - there is always a new twist available to cast a slightly different shade of gray, and users cannot be expected to scour the forums on a title-by-title basis. Similarly, refining and complicating the rules to satisfactorily contain each of these new variants is an exercise in futility.
Local databases can support an infinite variety of variants for title and other fields, and the local locks are available to make those changes permanent. With this in mind, hopefully the supporters on both sides of this and other similar debates can agree that the direction of a decision here is less important that the fact of a decision. Consistency for submission to the online is possible and what we should shoot for. Agreement on how it "should be" is neither possible nor (thankfully) necessary.
We'll be implementing a global edit for contribution evaluator use. This will allow us to make a decision on a particular range of titles and standardize them directly. In this particular case, the titles will be Men in Black, Men in Black II and Men in Black III. Details on the forthcoming implementation will be posted before we begin making any profile changes." |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | For the record: I was wrong to make an unqualified statement. I will however maintain that the exceptions Kathy rightfully mentioned to not apply to the case at hand. |
|