| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,321 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
You are lying again, you Stretched to Fit. I think "mistaken" might be a better choice of words than "lying". No need to pick a fight here. It's quite clear what he's asking for and why. | | | Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection. |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 |  Posts: 41 |
| | Posted: | | | | Lying??? Why would I???  Let him be, Mark. As a matter of fact: let him be be be be be. Everyone who adds the DVD to his/her collection right now, can see that the blurry covers are - indeed - in the databse at this moment. For who wants to check: try it, you can delete the DVD afterwards. It's # 8716777001974. Then again, why bother... |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 41 |
| | Posted: | | | | Don't understand why I'm being called a liar and why I'm being accused of 'scaling the original images up'. Because I didn't do anything like that. That's why I made this video. Maybe you guys get to see other database images??? But this is what I get to see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgDcbd8pOoQ&feature=youtu.be
As you can see: the video starts with the images I scanned. I click on the front cover image to show you a little bit more detail. Not the brightest of color, but certainly not as blurry as the database one. Then I click on the button to get to see the differences (don't know the English word for it, because for me the program is in Dutch). Left: my image. Right: the database image. When I click on the images, you get to see them bigger. Again, left: my image. Right: the database image, a very small image. Then I click to accept the database images. (Mine are not accepted yet, so these are the ones you get from the database). When they are downloaded, I click on the images again. You can clearly see that it's the more blurry ones again. | | | | Last edited: by RoWi1973 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting RoWi1973: Quote:
Don't understand why I'm being called a liar and why I'm being accused of 'scaling the original images up'.   | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 41 |
| |
| Registered: May 16, 2010 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 516 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would surely vote for the scan that is better readable, the Overview and other details. For me this is more important than the absolut correct colors. And on actual Backcover you really can't read anything. | | | *
3D TV Panasonic TX-P65VT30J + Blu-ray Player Panasonic DMP-BDT500
My Filmcollection online: www.filmkino.ch
* |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting RoWi1973: Quote:
Yes? And? And, after you scaled the original images up, you then lossy recompressed them. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,131 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
Quoting RoWi1973:
Quote:
Yes? And?
And, after you scaled the original images up, you then lossy recompressed them. new scans have been accepted and released. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes? And?
And, after you scaled the original images up, you then lossy recompressed them.
new scans have been accepted and released. Right decision. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|