| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
I am sorry, but you are making a lot of assumptions...the biggest one being that people are actually making a conscious decision to vote against the rules. ... I don't see any difference. When somebody votes against rules, there are two possibilities: 1/ He knows the rules, and votes against because it is his preference 2/ He does not know the rules, and votes according to his preferences In both cases, I can assume that he does not agree with the concerned rule, which is not really a surprise when I see what rules ask us to do : invent non existing actors... , recopy, or worse, add spelling mistakes... , use the ugliest cover when a best one exists ... | | | | Images from movies | | | | Last edited: by surfeur51 |
|
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,851 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Quoting DoubleDownAgain:
Quote:
I'm surprised it got declined, as per the rules it should include the slip
At this point I'm convinced that the votes far outweigh the rules when it comes to influencing the screeners.
I'm not. Unless I misunderstood, the screeners went with the minority opinion here.  I regularly see things approved that are against the rules (e.g. the use of group dividers for song titles with one songwriter listed beneath) and have to assume that a preponderance of "yes" votes is to blame. This one isn't even a grey area, just a preference of some contributors/voters. --------------- |
|