| Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote:
If you were to argue that the case inside the slip cover is the actual case for the child profiles, then where's the outer case for the season?
A slip cover is not a case. If it were, it were a slip case but by defintion a slip case must hold more than one inner case or else it's just a slip cover.
So even by Invelos forum's craftsmanship of bending the rules to one's own will I honestly don't see how a case with a slip cover for a season profile suddenly becomes case without a slip cover when it's literally the same case. Personally, I think that that contribution is wrong and should NOT have been approved by the screeners. I have thought about resubmitting the correct data but I can't be bothered. The majority voted for incorrect data - so be it. |
|
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,870 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
When a rule can be read more then one way all you can do is contribute and vote per your understanding of the rules. Unfortunately this can cause 2 camps contributing and voting their own way... meaning no consistency in the online database.
For what it is worth I always seen it to be slip case images on parent and child profiles.. Same here, my feeling on the intent of the rule is when you have a slip case or custom with multiple packages with discs in the case type. The rule should be more specific. It was one of those that the screeners needed to decide since there was ambiguity. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote:
If you were to argue that the case inside the slip cover is the actual case for the child profiles, then where's the outer case for the season?
A slip cover is not a case. If it were, it were a slip case but by defintion a slip case must hold more than one inner case or else it's just a slip cover.
So even by Invelos forum's craftsmanship of bending the rules to one's own will I honestly don't see how a case with a slip cover for a season profile suddenly becomes case without a slip cover when it's literally the same case. ^ This. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,870 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well there is always the option of someone re-contributing them (putting them back the way they were) and see what the screeners do again lol | | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Scooter1836: Quote:
Well there is always the option of someone re-contributing them (putting them back the way they were) and see what the screeners do again lol Given the inconsistency, I wouldn't be surprised if it were accepted. I won't do it as I deleted the child profiles (I was the one who initially created them for the fourth season). |
|