Quoting Jimmy S:

Quote:
Quoting Kulju:

Quote:

Personally I don't give a rat's ass, but did you took a look at the back cover. Only in a America tits are evil 

No, I don't own the dvd and don't plan to buy it...

Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
Because he reported that a title, with nudity on the cover, was the first thing he saw when he opened the "Add by Title" screen?

In that case if the guy is so easilly offended being on internet isn't a good idea as he risk an heart attack.

Quoting VenicuS:

Quote:

Sheesh, you try to be part of the community...

By waiting four and a half year to make a "Think Of The Children" post... Give me a break 
Do you think I will loose any sleep because I paint you as the "I'm offended everyone must be" type of guy you are...

Yes, I'm generally not one to post on forums, as such is my choice.  I think DVD Profiler is a great product, hence the reason I've paid my money for the full version, adding to the company's revenues, which I hope in turn contributes to improving on the product.  In using the product I've paid for, I saw something I thought might potentially be problematic, and perhaps it would be completely innocuous, and my concerns unfounded.  But I made the choice to try and being the issue to the attention of those I felt would need to know.  That said, I can only ask at this point, why are you attacking me?  Apparently your perceived knowledge of my being offended by adult entertainment (which is utterly non-existent I might add) is patently offensive to you, for reasons which I don't understand. 

I don't know you.  You don't know me.  How is it I've managed to offend you so badly?

Quoting Jimmy S:

Quote:
Quoting Kulju:

Quote:

Personally I don't give a rat's ass, but did you took a look at the back cover. Only in a America tits are evil 

No, I don't own the dvd and don't plan to buy it...

What on earth that has to do with this issue? 

Quoting Jimmy S:

Quote:
Nothing, you asked me if I've seen the back cover and I gave you an answer. Unless it was a generic question and you didn't expect an answer?

Quoting VenicuS:

Quote:

I don't know you.  You don't know me.  How is it I've managed to offend you so badly?

You didn't offend me at all. I just don't like the "Think Of The Children" mentallity and found your "I'm not offended" comment hypocritical that's all. Personally if something offend me I don't watch it and forget about it, I don't post about it in a forum. The product is use by adult and you must expect to see adult image from time to time...

I disagree again. Adults are not the only people that use this program. I have a 15 year old who adds titles in the wishlist and she's been doing it for 3 years.

Quoting Jimmy S:

Quote:
So what? I'm not the one responsible to monitor what your kid do, it's your job not mine. The society doesn't have to became a kiddies world because of the kids. If someone find nudity offensive for his/her kid this is fine with me, but it isn't my problem to deal with it.

Who asked you to deal with it? 

If you don't want to deal with it, that is your choice but why get so upset when someone else makes a different choice?  You say he didn't offend you, yet you were upset enough to attack and insult him.  Sounds like yuu were offended to me.

I just tried something and found another adult title that is visible even with parental controls on.

If one does a search for Drippers (with the Search Within Title box checked) an obvious porno title will show up. Even though it has no cover art in the profile, it can be easily seen by children or by those that may not want to see such titles.

So yes, ateo is correct, Either the OP's case was a glitch or more likely someone uploaded the profile and didn't mark it as an Adult title per the rules.

It has nothing at all about being a prude or a hypocrite, it's about either a glitch or someone didn't follow the rules.

Quoting DJ Doena:

Quote:
Quoting CubbyUps:

Quote:
If one does a search for Drippers (with the Search Within Title box checked) an obvious porno title will show up. Even though it has no cover art in the profile, it can be easily seen by children or by those that may not want to see such titles.

I can see a point for the original critzised profile (which is why I haven't chipped in so far).

But this? So you have to know the exact title of this movie, it hasn't even covers that could give the adult content away yet you still fear that people might accidentally stumble over this?

I only used the word Drippers because the first word in the title is Adult in nature and I didn't want to get into trouble posting that on here.

But perhaps a kid was going through the list and was at Cuckoo in the list and this title would show up later on down.

Another point is I wonder how many Adult titles are in the database that could be shown in the list even with the Parental Controls on. Already there are/were two, odds are there are many more and perhaps with pornographic covers much worse than what was in the OP.

Quoting DJ Doena:

Quote:
Quoting CubbyUps:

Quote:
But perhaps a kid was going through the list and was at Cuckoo in the list and this title would show up later on down.

Another point is I wonder how many Adult titles are in the database that could be shown in the list even with the Parental Controls on. Already there are/were two, odds are there are many more and perhaps with pornographic covers much worse than what was in the OP.

Yeah but such is life. you will never 100% make sure childs won't see porn when they turn on the computer or even the TV. Rule 34 is a fact of life.

You're right. Can't stop everything, we can only do our best. I'm glad the OP just didn't ignore it but brought it to everyones attention. My problem is with the response in the forum.