Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,378 |
| Posted: | | | | I only want the company information as the roles assigned to the crew member explains what the company does eg: Joe Blow: Visual Effects under the heading Joe Blow Visual Effects Company. To me this describes exactly what I am looking for. Cheers Kelvin |
|
Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,998 |
| Posted: | | | | On the other hand this let's you know they did the effects specifically for the sharks in the film, without it what do you know? Quote: <<<Digital Shark Animation by Hammerhead Productions>>> Rebecca Marie...Visual Effects Supervisor Jamie Dixon...Visual Effects Supervisor Theresa Ellis...Digital Effects Supervisor There are arguments both ways which is why we need a decision | | | Last edited: by ninehours |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Now of course we can start repeating all earlier discussions, but I think at this point only a decision by Invelos will bring us any further. |
|
Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,998 |
| Posted: | | | | We still need a decision on this from Invelos Please |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ninehours: Quote: We still need a decision on this from Invelos Please Indeed. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | I just wanted to add that I'm not too keen on the idea of adding the extra stuff "only if it adds context", as who decides what adds context and what doesn't? I'd rather have a simple statement that says all go in or all come out. Personally I'd prefer all to go in. |
|
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: I just wanted to add that I'm not too keen on the idea of adding the extra stuff "only if it adds context", as who decides what adds context and what doesn't? I'd rather have a simple statement that says all go in or all come out. Personally I'd prefer all to go in. Same here, all in. Although I can't find 'Visual Effects by' very useful but all other extra stuff is. | | | Cor | | | Last edited: by Corne |
|
Registered: August 4, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,441 |
| Posted: | | | | I think that the better is the simpler (and it seems that the majority is asking for the same). No redundance like: Visual effects by XYZ John Doe as Visual Effects. | | | Updated List of Accepted Birth Years |
|
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kluge: Quote: I think that the better is the simpler (and it seems that the majority is asking for the same). No redundance like: Visual effects by XYZ John Doe as Visual Effects. If 'Visual Effects (by)' is disallowed then it's still simple... | | | Cor |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: I just wanted to add that I'm not too keen on the idea of adding the extra stuff "only if it adds context", as who decides what adds context and what doesn't? I'd rather have a simple statement that says all go in or all come out. Personally I'd prefer all to go in. Count me in on this as well. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,749 |
| Posted: | | | | What's the point of listing the companies at all if we don't know what they did? You would have to put the BRD or DVD in and skip to the end credits to find out any useful information. I like the extra info. | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote: What's the point of listing the companies at all if we don't know what they did? You would have to put the BRD or DVD in and skip to the end credits to find out any useful information. I like the extra info. Indeed, good point! | | | Cor |
|
Registered: August 4, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,441 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote: What's the point of listing the companies at all if we don't know what they did? You would have to put the BRD or DVD in and skip to the end credits to find out any useful information. I like the extra info. We know what the company did, under the divider is listed the credits for the crew (person --> job), we don't need to add two time the same credit. | | | Updated List of Accepted Birth Years |
|
Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,998 |
| Posted: | | | | Please Ken put a stop to this continual bickering and make a decision, do we use the extended details on not, right now i don't care which way it goes just PLEASE make a choice so we are all doing it the same |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm all in favor of including all the data.
We try and duplicate the cast/crew data as closely as possible, but here we are eliminating data for some reason that I can't really grasp.
From my viewpoint it surely isn't to try and duplicate the company credit and it's associated "role".
And what are we going to do about unique credits such as, oh I don't know, Terminator Effects by, Bridge Collapse Visual Effects by? Are those going to be banned or allowed on a case by case basis?
I don't see how this can really be any more work then say entering cast members such as: Townie #1 Townie #2 Townie #3 and so on. If we wanted to simplify these credits because it's redundant why not just enter a group header once for "Townies"? Why because it doesn't duplicate the actual credit? But as I said here with the company credit some want to simplify the credit just because the data is redundant in their minds just because of credits below them have the same type of credit. |
|
Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,998 |
| Posted: | | | | Apology's to everyone but I'm going to keep bumping this until we get a decision |
|