| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 27, 2007 | | Posts: 175 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CalebAndCo: Quote:
Coming over from DVDSpot, which handled discs without UPCs differently, has exposed a problem:
Importing a DVD into Profiler with UPC 000000-000000 automatically links it with the cinematic masterpiece "Wet & Eighteen." The problem being that the back cover of that Jury Selection is, shall we say, rather explicit.
HAHAHAHAHA! Sorry, had to laugh. I was wondering how that very title ended up in my collection after a DVDSpot import. I couldn't figure it out, and yes, didn't want my kids stumbling across those images. I meekly deleted it without diving into the mystery. Thanks for clearing it up. DD. |
|
| Registered: October 6, 2008 |  Posts: 1,932 |
| |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 1,982 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote:
There's no UPC whatsoever on the back cover. I don't own it, I've my share of adult movies but I prefer the seventies and eighties production. But it looks like some adult dvd that I've in my library : any chance that this movie was bought at Excalibur Films? Some of their dvd are self press and don't come with an UPC or a real cover : Back cover exemple Safe for work no nudity on it, just didn't want to hurt anyone feeling  If it's the case those dvd are not suppose to be in the database. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 1,242 |
| | Posted: | | | | Either way, whether the DVD's have UPC/EAN 's or not the rules do specify that you as a user are not allowed to enter fake UPC/EAN 's but to use the Disc ID's in instances where UPC/EAN don't exist.
So therefore the owners of these faked UPC/EAN 's should be made to re-submit their DVD's as per the rules and the faked ones should be removed from the Database.
Steve |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting snarbo: Quote:
Either way, whether the DVD's have UPC/EAN 's or not the rules do specify that you as a user are not allowed to enter fake UPC/EAN 's but to use the Disc ID's in instances where UPC/EAN don't exist.
So therefore the owners of these faked UPC/EAN 's should be made to re-submit their DVD's as per the rules and the faked ones should be removed from the Database.
Steve Completely agreed. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,279 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote:
any chance that this movie was bought at Excalibur Films? Some of their dvd are self press and don't come with an UPC or a real cover :
If it's the case those dvd are not suppose to be in the database. I'm fairly certain the entry that added this title the second time did have a link off to Excalibur films in the submission notes. | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 | | | | Last edited: by Lithurge |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Nick: Why would a link to Excalibur have any relevance. It is a made up UPC # which is against the Rules. It should have been submitted using Disc ID. There is only one answer and it is not even gray, very black & white. Skip  | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Nick:
Why would a link to Excalibur have any relevance. It is a made up UPC # which is against the Rules. It should have been submitted using Disc ID. There is only one answer and it is not even gray, very black & white.
Skip which one is Nick? | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Nick:
Why would a link to Excalibur have any relevance. It is a made up UPC # which is against the Rules. It should have been submitted using Disc ID. There is only one answer and it is not even gray, very black & white.
Skip
which one is Nick?  , Lithurge. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,494 |
| | Posted: | | | | Skips knows everyone on a first name basis.. whether we do or not... I was going to say as well if you do a 12 digit upc 000000-000000 and get that 'wet and 18' title , just change the location other than USA and it will be cured and fixed.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,242 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote:
Skips knows everyone on a first name basis.. whether we do or not...
I was going to say as well if you do a 12 digit upc 000000-000000 and get that 'wet and 18' title , just change the location other than USA and it will be cured and fixed.. And that Terry, would still be against the Rules. If NO UPC/EAN then use the Disc ID to identify the DVD in question, as this is how we ended up with many Bootlegs in the IVS DB in the first place. I still say that the 2 000000-000000's that are in the DB now should be purged any the owner's of these titles should be made to re-submit them by a Legitimate means ie the Disc ID. Steve |
|
| Registered: May 27, 2007 |  Posts: 691 |
| | Posted: | | | | If you add another 0 to the upc there is an entry for 'the electric grandmother'. | | | | Unfortunately, I can't use DVDprofiler at the moment due to lack of a Windows computer. |
|
| Registered: October 6, 2008 | | Posts: 1,932 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EdwinK: Quote:
If you add another 0 to the upc there is an entry for 'the electric grandmother'. That I would buy! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,242 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EdwinK: Quote:
If you add another 0 to the upc there is an entry for 'the electric grandmother'. Then that's another illegal UPC/EAN that should be removed. Again use the Disc ID, that's what it's there for. Steve |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,279 |
| | Posted: | | | | I was making no point as to relevance, just answering a question that was asked.
Don't see any issue with that. | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|