| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 4,596 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting surfeur51: Quote:
Quoting 8ballMax:
Quote:
What on Earth does this have anything what-so-ever to do with your original post where you bragged about your contribution vote record?
I already wrote many times that I only contributed new profiles. As I was reproached to always say the same thing, I thought it was not useful to write that once again. But as you said, who cares ?  When you are Contributing ONLY new titles you won't even get any Yes votes, so that's nothing to be trumpeting as an accomplishment. My concern would be, how big a mess is being made since there is no oversight. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 41 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Nadja: Quote:
It doesn't necessarily need to be a PM, it could just reappear on the pending votes screen. I had thought of this as an additional approach but wasn't sure exactly how it could be implemented. If I was being informed that an update had been made to a submission I had already voted on, I would want to be able to review my original vote and comments before amending them. That's why I suggested the PM approach. Quoting karstenp: Quote:
Simplest version: Alert all voters
Enhanced (1): Alert all voters, by default, but possible to overrule.
Enhanced (2): Alert all NO or all YES voters (by choice)
My original intent was to improve the voting process in support of the screeners so that the votes were reflective of the latest modifications to contri notes. But I can see your suggestions as a way to benefit the contributor in providing an easy means of communicating with NO voters to get them to reconsider. | | | Kevin
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there! | | | | Last edited: by MovieBug |
|