Quoting Agrare:

Quote:
but you're changing the title to get to that conclusion. Its not Step up to the streets. Its Step Up 2 The Streets. It takes place on the streets its about street dancing (hence an episode descriptor). Its no different than Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan or Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. (edit as Unicus pointed out its a number because its a series. 2 = two, not to. those are two different words)

I'm not changing a thing. The title is presented as "step up 2 the streets" in every official source I can find. Simply saying that "'the streets' is in a smaller font therefore it is a subtitle" is missing the point. It's NOT the same as the examples you cite, for the reasons I have already given; it's presented as a phrase on the rear cover, it's spoken as that phrase by the cast and crew in the extras, and the BVHE site lists it without a colon. It's just not an episode descriptor.

Quote:
The back is irrelevant, unless you are now saying that the Colon between Episode I: The Phantom Menace (and the other episodes) should be removed because they are written without a colon on the back cover (which is still irrelevant because the rule doesn't say 'take the title from the front cover unless the back cover allows for a different interpretation). (Actually, not trying to bring up old wars, but per the front cover its Star Wars: I: The Phantom Menace but it says Episode I on the back)

Other places (do a google search) list it with the colon as well. But that is actually irrelevant to our purpose as well.

That's also a questionable comparison. Although there is no colon in that place on the rear covers for the prequel trilogy, each of them lists the title of the particular episode in full capitals where the "Episode N" part is normally capitalised. Besides, the back cover in those examples IS irrelevant, as the title given there doesn't match the front at all (also not trying to open that debate again, btw!

Who's "WE", Skip? Yesterday everyone is the "thought police" and today you stand as spokesperson?

Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
The title is presented as "step up 2 the streets" in every official source I can find.

I have found sources that show it is a subtitle.

Norrth:

How about you stay out of it. Nadja firredc the first shot not I. In his usual combative nature NOT unlike yours.

I am frankly very tired of being attacked by the likes of you, Nadka and others  and then if respond in any way I GET SLAMMED when it is you who should be the one to get pounded.

Skip

I do';t care what gender any user is, Thje comment which was made by the user and followed by you was insulting, combative and at the very least out and out nasty. If youy can spoeak to me with some respect I will give you respect, but if you wish to continue with YOUR kind of garbage, I will fight back everytime. Got it. So, it's up to you, north, how do you want to play this game?

Skip

Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
Although once again I will state that I am male. I know the nick misleads but I've never identified myself as female.

Well there was this school play... mmm sequins

My apologies 

Quoting northbloke:

Quote:
Quoting Nadja:

Quote:
Although once again I will state that I am male. I know the nick misleads but I've never identified myself as female.

Well there was this school play... mmm sequins

My apologies 

No harm done!

Ooh, they were such sparkly sequins...

LOL, Nadja. I hope you have seen this film and will get the reference, you like sparkly's.

It was a Don Bluth film.

Skip

Looking at those sites, I can certainly Nadja's point - it is referred to as Step Up 2 The Streets an awful lot. However, there still is the occasional reference to Step Up 2, which leaves me undecided.

I will say though that what we are looking for is not the name of the movie, but the name of the DVD, and it does seem clear to me that Step Up 2 is given much more prominence on the front cover than The Streets. This suggests that on the front cover at least, The Streets is seen as a subtitle, not part of the title.

But seeing how I don't own this title, nor am I ever likely too, I think it only fair to bow out as I won't be affected by the outcome and I genuinely believe both titles could been seen to be supported by the rules.