 |
|
|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3  Previous Next
|
|
DVD without a title? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 940 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote:
I still haven't seen this one entered correctly.  Isn't that 3.14159265359? | | | | Kevin |
| | Registered: March 26, 2007 | | Posts: 196 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting antolod: Quote:
Isn't that 3.14159265359? Not exactly. |
| | Registered: April 14, 2007 | | Posts: 433 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote:
I still haven't seen this one entered correctly. Pi isn't correct? pithemovie.com | | | | Chris |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 940 |
| | Posted: | | | | My calculator only gives me those digits. I'm not one of those nerds who have it memorized to 100s of decimal places.  | | | | Kevin |
| | Registered: May 25, 2007 | | Posts: 176 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Quoting wintermute115:
Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Ummmm what does it say on the back cover and/or the spine...BATMAN...maybe?
Yes, it does. But the rules clearly say to take the title from the front cover only. Which is why I was wondering what other people thought about this.
so you don't want to use any common sense then? Feel free to have a totally blank title in your collection - but the rest of us will probably have something like err. Batman.. I am in favour of the "Batman" option. And I even think that the spine might be abetter place to start looking for the title than the front cover (you're less likely to need to parse out possessives and the like, for one thing), but many heated arguments have been had over people claiming that common sense should be allowed to trump the rules. So I just wanted to know where the community stood on this one. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | "Common sense" just dictated that a graphical roman figure could not represent Episode, so there we are... | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| | Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Patsa:
I am amused. If you are looking to cause a problem, an exception can ALWAYS be found. This movie holds no interest for me, personally, so I don't own it, but I do see that there is no image of the back cover so we can see what the credit block might say. The Rules will NEVER be able to cover each and every base, there will always be some sort of an exception, some will be easier than others to sort out, but they can all be sorted out. Once an answer is found for this one, then somebody will discover another one, and so on. I thought your original post, while a bit odd, seemed geared in the direction of figuringit out, your second post makes me think differently.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | The copyrighted title is Pi found at the US Copyright Office. BTW
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: May 25, 2007 | | Posts: 176 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Patsa:
I am amused. If you are looking to cause a problem, an exception can ALWAYS be found. This movie holds no interest for me, personally, so I don't own it, but I do see that there is no image of the back cover so we can see what the credit block might say. The Rules will NEVER be able to cover each and every base, there will always be some sort of an exception, some will be easier than others to sort out, but they can all be sorted out. Once an answer is found for this one, then somebody will discover another one, and so on. I thought your original post, while a bit odd, seemed geared in the direction of figuringit out, your second post makes me think differently.
Skip The back cover of my copy looks like this:  The credit block is too small to make out, and I'm not at home to check the actual box, but the various quotes use the Pi symbol rather than the word "Pi", so I would not be surprised whichever way that goes. However, given that DVDPro can't handle non-Latin characters, there is really no question with this one. It's the mathematical symbol rather than the Greek letter, and so the only possible transliteration is "Pi". If it was the Greek letter, though, an argument could be made that it should be "P". |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Patsa:
I am amused. If you are looking to cause a problem, an exception can ALWAYS be found. This movie holds no interest for me, personally, so I don't own it, but I do see that there is no image of the back cover so we can see what the credit block might say. The Rules will NEVER be able to cover each and every base, there will always be some sort of an exception, some will be easier than others to sort out, but they can all be sorted out. Once an answer is found for this one, then somebody will discover another one, and so on. I thought your original post, while a bit odd, seemed geared in the direction of figuringit out, your second post makes me think differently.
Skip I agree the rules were never meant to cover every possible situation, yet some people insist on treating them as they would with ridiculous results. This one is no different. As for my copy of Pi, it has the symbol in the copyright on the back also. Which of course makes no difference if you take the rule literaly to mean that we must use the front cover and front cover only. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Patsa:
I did some research and found the back cover, which was why I then went to the Copyright Office site to find it, and as I noted the COPYRIGHTED title IS Pi.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|   | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Patsa:
I did some research and found the back cover, which was why I then went to the Copyright Office site to find it, and as I noted the COPYRIGHTED title IS Pi.
Skip While I'd also list this as "Pi", I do feel it's important to point out that for DVD Profiler purposes, it's completely irrelevant under what title a movie is registered at the US Copyright Office. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I understand that, tim. but the cover is totally inconclusive from our vieww point, so drop back five yards and PUNT.  I'll trust the US Copyright Office long before i will many of the other available sources. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'll just take the title from the opening credits. | | | | Hal |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Which says what, Hal?
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |