|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
stunt and stunt double in cast section (In the shadows) |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | You all realise that the director in all his wisdom included the stunt man & stunt double in his cast list. Who are we to decide they don't belong there. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | The rules tell us only to include actors, and stuntmen do not act they are on fire or jump of a building, they do this for real. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,715 |
| Posted: | | | | As long as the "Stunts" is a role name instead of a profession - and as I interpret this thread, this is the case - I'd list them as cast.
Regards, AA | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| | Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | So i could put the stunts in with a divider "stunts" | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: I agree with RHo and Voltaire53, that is how I always understood the "agreement" as well. If it is, it's an utterly ridiculous "agreement". As I have pointed out before: although I'd personally rather leave them out altogether (like Martin, I don't consider them "cast" at all), I'd be happy to track them in DVD Profiler if that's what the majority wants. But it's complete and utter nonsense to decide whether to track a certain group of people based on whether there's a space between the end of the cast list and the stunt people. I've said it before and I'll say it again: either we track stunt people, or we don't. There's no use in doing half of the time: that renders the data completely useless. It's like deciding that we exclude all cast listed in ALL-CAPS... Bottom line: either we track 'em, or we don't. Not "sometimes", based on a completely random formatting decision made by the guy who put together the credits for any particular movie. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote: So i could put the stunts in with a divider "stunts" You could, but that's not what I meant. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Not "sometimes", based on a completely random formatting decision made by the guy who put together the credits for any particular movie. thats all we got, the credits to go on. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Not "sometimes", based on a completely random formatting decision made by the guy who put together the credits for any particular movie.
thats all we got, the credits to go on. Sure, but what does that have to do with anything? Apparently this is not about the data, but just about how to deal with on-screen formatting of that data on-screen. Again: I don't care what we do, as long as we're consistent. If I'm going to track stunt people, I want to track them for all of my films, not just the ones where there didn't happen to be space between the end of the cast list and the stunt people. That is ridiculous: it results in completely useless data. Think about it: if you enter a few stuntmen this way, and you click on one of their names, what do get? Does DVD Profiler produce a list of all movies in your collection this person worked on? No! Just try and define what you'll get there, and you'll understand that it's ridiculous to enter data in this manner. Again: either we track 'em, or we don't. But not just randomly based on formatting. IMHO, we're not meant to track them at all: I consider them crew, not cast. The closest thing to guidance that the rules have to offer on the subject is the fact that stunt people can indeed not be listed in the "crew" section, and that the "cast" section obviously isn't exactly meant for it as well: the "actor name - role name" format is a clear enough hint for me that it wasn't meant to deal with stunt people, let alone stunt coordinators. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | You are correct, we were not meant to track stunt people. The problem is, the rules tell us to, "take the actor information from the end credits only, with names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."
I tried to find a way to exclude stunt people, that are incorporated into the cast list, but I couldn't. I couldn't get around the word 'exactly'. Until the rules are amended, to allow for the exclusion of parts of the cast list, we are stuck with this compromise. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: You are correct, we were not meant to track stunt people. The problem is, the rules tell us to, "take the actor information from the end credits only, with names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."
I tried to find a way to exclude stunt people, that are incorporated into the cast list, but I couldn't. I couldn't get around the word 'exactly'. Until the rules are amended, to allow for the exclusion of parts of the cast list, we are stuck with this compromise. Ken? Are you reading this? It's time for you to chime in... |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,715 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote: "Stunts" isn't a role name, it's a group name. I don't know, if I got the problem with this especially film, but I'm afraid you didn't get my argument. What I meant: It seems to me that in this film the cast has to play stuntmen - which means acting and deserves being mentioned in the cast list - instead of stuntmen doubling the real cast - which is stunt work and is not mentioned in DVDP... Regards, AA | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|