Just voted NO on the Species release change. Amazon is the source given for this change but if you look at DVD Empire it shows 4/4/91, that shows you how reliable those dates are. The movie was only made in 1995.

Dirk

Richie:

As noted you are in UK RTWO, why are you arguing over R1. If you tell me that R2 titles are released aon thursdays and i can check that quickly, then cool, what do I know from R2 tritles. Sorry I am interested in ACCURATE data not data which we know to be historically incorrect if it is other than Tuesday and NOT made up data from some questionable third party source.

Give me a press release and I'll buy; it anything else, not just NO but Hell NO!!!!!

@ Goblins. wow cool, Species released to DVD not 4 years before the movie but 6 years BEFORE DVD.

It is also NOT the responsibility of voters to try and help the user verify his data, your Vote Notes are NOT part of the permanent record  for a title, the ONLY permanent record are the notes of the Contributor.

Skip

You are absolutely correct Mark. If you look around on the web you find 3 or more release dates for most of the titles this user is changing. We should leave the release date alone unless we have a reliable source as Skip mentioned, press release or something direct from the distributor.

Dirk

Be on the look out... I have noticed him re-submitting some of these. He also submitted/Resubmitted a back cover art for a Goosebumps DVD from dvdempire that clearly shows Copyrighted Material on it.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
Richie:

As noted you are in UK RTWO, why are you arguing over R1.

Not trying to start a fight here, but what does it matter where Richie is?  How many times have you involved yourself in other regions?  How many times have you added DVDs, from other reagions, to your wish list just to vote on them?

I know that many of our friends around the world purchase R1 DVDs, so let's not start excluding peeople from discussions simply because of where they live.   

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
You missed the point again, sir.

Then, please, enlighten me.

Quote:
Perfectly normal for one who parses down to the word. You miss the bigger pctiure, by trying to focus on the brush strokes.

You still have no idea what a parser does, do you?  Let me help you...using your own example.

You are correct, as a parser I see the brush strokes.  However, being a parser does not mean I don't know that those brush strokes, when put together, form a larger picture.  As a parser, I can enjoy the subtlety of those strokes as well as the whole picture.  Appreciating one does not mean I am blind to the other.  A bad assumption on your part.

God, i can't believe i have to 'splain it to you, Loooocy.

Point #1 I was not the first to make the comment, I merely echoed it.
Point #2 There are areas as i explained that I do nothave sufficient information to be able to deal with it, such as potential release conventions in UK, if there are any.
Point #3 On those rare ocassions when I electronically cross the big pond, it is NOT rock science, I can see  quite easily that Cast or crew data is being mishandled or that an Overview on a back cover might be in say Finnish and someone is trying to Contribute ENGLISH. Put your rocks back in your pouch, you don't know or understand enough to use them.

Sheeeesh!!!!!

Skip  

Please PM me if I inadvertantly voted yes to any of these while half asleep.